LightNews LightNews
ltru8.bsky.social
@ltru8.bsky.social
1K followers 620 following 70 posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted
thedangerousones.com
WE NEED YOU to help us GROW and AMPLIFY these important pro-democracy voices!

CHIP IN HERE 👉 secure.actblue.com/donate/tdo

 🎧 SUBSCRIBE to our audio podcast:
Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/t...

Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/2jIQ23X...
Support The Dangerous Ones Network!
We’re building an army of resisters, a family bound not by fear, but by courage and connection. Every voice we lift, every story we share, is a spark against the darkness.
secure.actblue.com
November 26, 2025 at 3:34 AM
Reposted
moberzan.bsky.social
Good evening & TY Phoenix
@phoenix509.bsky.social

@climbtotheclouds.bsky.social
@marielem.bsky.social
@juju71.bsky.social
@antmousie.bsky.social
@deedeedeeds.bsky.social
@jandee924.bsky.social
@jpwilliams.bsky.social
@churlayla.bsky.social
@nickmilakovic.bsky.social
@neverstopthefight.bsky.social
November 25, 2025 at 10:53 PM
Reposted
barnz65.bsky.social
If soldiers are approaching their representatives about the orders they are receiving. It’s a clear sign we have a serious problem.

Let us never forget.
The Trump administration has not dismantled the entire Judge Advocate General's Corps (JAG), but in February 2025, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth fired the top uniformed lawyers for the Army and Air Force and requested a nomination for the Navy JAG position, which was already vacant. This action was part of a wider purge of senior military and government officials and has been met with significant controversy and legal challenges. Details of the Actions • Firings and Replacements: The administration dismissed the Army JAG, Lt. Gen. Joseph B. Berger Ill, and Air Force JAG, Lt. Gen. Charles Plummer, arguing it was "time for fresh blood" and that the previous officers were not well-suited for their roles. The administration sought new, "merit-based" nominations for these positions. • Concerns over Independence: Critics, including former military lawyers and lawmakers, have expressed serious concerns that the firings are an attempt to replace independent legal counsel with political loyalists who might not challenge potentially unlawful orders. JAG officers are responsible for providing independent legal advice to military commanders and ensuring actions comply with the law of war and the Constitution. • Impact on the Rule of Law: The move is viewed by many as an attack on the rule of law within the military and could undermine commanders' access to frank, unbiased legal advice, potentially leading to catastrophic errors in judgment.
November 25, 2025 at 10:53 PM