- programming: github.com/TheLortex
- pictures: instagram.com/elpluvina
- weblog: lortex.org
Formerly known as twitter.com/TheLortex
Nullable types are nice but they don't replace an option type, as you need to define your own if you want to encode Option<Option<T>> (i.e. you cannot write "T??").
Result: only the success value is typed, not the error
Thanks for the article, I'll take a look
Nullable types are nice but they don't replace an option type, as you need to define your own if you want to encode Option<Option<T>> (i.e. you cannot write "T??").
Result: only the success value is typed, not the error
Thanks for the article, I'll take a look
Some weirdnesses though, like the absence of Option or typed Result types. And no checked exceptions ? 😶🌫️
Some weirdnesses though, like the absence of Option or typed Result types. And no checked exceptions ? 😶🌫️