@lordpidey.bsky.social
SweetBaby Inc is a corporation.
Corporations don't count as people to me.
So no, I don't treat you as I would treat a person.
Corporations don't count as people to me.
So no, I don't treat you as I would treat a person.
September 27, 2025 at 12:04 AM
SweetBaby Inc is a corporation.
Corporations don't count as people to me.
So no, I don't treat you as I would treat a person.
Corporations don't count as people to me.
So no, I don't treat you as I would treat a person.
Also add in:
Birth control pills for males were known about in the 1970s, called WIN-18446.
Still not legal for them, 50 years later.
It was authorized for women 20 years after development.
Birth control pills for males were known about in the 1970s, called WIN-18446.
Still not legal for them, 50 years later.
It was authorized for women 20 years after development.
September 3, 2025 at 5:51 AM
Also add in:
Birth control pills for males were known about in the 1970s, called WIN-18446.
Still not legal for them, 50 years later.
It was authorized for women 20 years after development.
Birth control pills for males were known about in the 1970s, called WIN-18446.
Still not legal for them, 50 years later.
It was authorized for women 20 years after development.
At least you HAVE the option.
There's like four types of male birth control pills. None are prescribeable. The first was discovered in the 1970s, called WIN-18446.
Yet it's not legal to prescribe. Even if patient and doctor agree it's appropriate, government rips away that right from men.
There's like four types of male birth control pills. None are prescribeable. The first was discovered in the 1970s, called WIN-18446.
Yet it's not legal to prescribe. Even if patient and doctor agree it's appropriate, government rips away that right from men.
September 3, 2025 at 5:49 AM
At least you HAVE the option.
There's like four types of male birth control pills. None are prescribeable. The first was discovered in the 1970s, called WIN-18446.
Yet it's not legal to prescribe. Even if patient and doctor agree it's appropriate, government rips away that right from men.
There's like four types of male birth control pills. None are prescribeable. The first was discovered in the 1970s, called WIN-18446.
Yet it's not legal to prescribe. Even if patient and doctor agree it's appropriate, government rips away that right from men.
When female birth control access is restricted, it's rightfully called out as an atrocity.
Yet, when men have THEIR options denied... you call them a wimp?
They're not wimps, they're literally having the government take their rights away.
HIGHLIGHT THAT, NOT CALL THEM A WIMP.
Yet, when men have THEIR options denied... you call them a wimp?
They're not wimps, they're literally having the government take their rights away.
HIGHLIGHT THAT, NOT CALL THEM A WIMP.
September 3, 2025 at 5:45 AM
When female birth control access is restricted, it's rightfully called out as an atrocity.
Yet, when men have THEIR options denied... you call them a wimp?
They're not wimps, they're literally having the government take their rights away.
HIGHLIGHT THAT, NOT CALL THEM A WIMP.
Yet, when men have THEIR options denied... you call them a wimp?
They're not wimps, they're literally having the government take their rights away.
HIGHLIGHT THAT, NOT CALL THEM A WIMP.
They already did so for men.
A male birth control pill named WIN-18446 was discovered in the 1970s. Yet even if you talk to your doctor and agree it's appropriate for you, you can be arrested if you purchase it.
A male birth control pill named WIN-18446 was discovered in the 1970s. Yet even if you talk to your doctor and agree it's appropriate for you, you can be arrested if you purchase it.
September 3, 2025 at 5:43 AM
They already did so for men.
A male birth control pill named WIN-18446 was discovered in the 1970s. Yet even if you talk to your doctor and agree it's appropriate for you, you can be arrested if you purchase it.
A male birth control pill named WIN-18446 was discovered in the 1970s. Yet even if you talk to your doctor and agree it's appropriate for you, you can be arrested if you purchase it.
Kind of like how the birth control compound WIN-18446 has a similar list of side effects, yet isn't allowed?
BTW: That's a male birth control pill discovered in the 1970s.
BTW: That's a male birth control pill discovered in the 1970s.
September 3, 2025 at 5:42 AM
Kind of like how the birth control compound WIN-18446 has a similar list of side effects, yet isn't allowed?
BTW: That's a male birth control pill discovered in the 1970s.
BTW: That's a male birth control pill discovered in the 1970s.
This is about a grand jury, so no. It's not selected by both sides.
September 2, 2025 at 11:09 PM
This is about a grand jury, so no. It's not selected by both sides.
I agree with you in general, but I would like you to note:
Male birth control has existed since the 1970s. The name of the drug is WIN 18446. Yet it's not legal to prescribe in ANY state in the US. Even if the doctor and patient agree it's appropriate, the government says NO.
Male birth control has existed since the 1970s. The name of the drug is WIN 18446. Yet it's not legal to prescribe in ANY state in the US. Even if the doctor and patient agree it's appropriate, the government says NO.
May 12, 2025 at 8:28 PM
I agree with you in general, but I would like you to note:
Male birth control has existed since the 1970s. The name of the drug is WIN 18446. Yet it's not legal to prescribe in ANY state in the US. Even if the doctor and patient agree it's appropriate, the government says NO.
Male birth control has existed since the 1970s. The name of the drug is WIN 18446. Yet it's not legal to prescribe in ANY state in the US. Even if the doctor and patient agree it's appropriate, the government says NO.
Does your book mention WIN-18446 at all?
If not, I think it would be a huge topic to bring up, considering that if it were approved by the FDA, that so many more Americans would have access to birth control. Yet even if a patient and doctor agree it's appropriate, the government forbids it.
If not, I think it would be a huge topic to bring up, considering that if it were approved by the FDA, that so many more Americans would have access to birth control. Yet even if a patient and doctor agree it's appropriate, the government forbids it.
May 12, 2025 at 8:23 PM
Does your book mention WIN-18446 at all?
If not, I think it would be a huge topic to bring up, considering that if it were approved by the FDA, that so many more Americans would have access to birth control. Yet even if a patient and doctor agree it's appropriate, the government forbids it.
If not, I think it would be a huge topic to bring up, considering that if it were approved by the FDA, that so many more Americans would have access to birth control. Yet even if a patient and doctor agree it's appropriate, the government forbids it.
Yes, I agree it's a human right.
And that's why I'm pushing to make people more aware of WIN-18446, a male birth control pill discovered in the 1970s.
Yet it is not authorized for prescription, despite that when taken properly, it similar severity of side effects compared to female birth control.
And that's why I'm pushing to make people more aware of WIN-18446, a male birth control pill discovered in the 1970s.
Yet it is not authorized for prescription, despite that when taken properly, it similar severity of side effects compared to female birth control.
May 12, 2025 at 8:19 PM
Yes, I agree it's a human right.
And that's why I'm pushing to make people more aware of WIN-18446, a male birth control pill discovered in the 1970s.
Yet it is not authorized for prescription, despite that when taken properly, it similar severity of side effects compared to female birth control.
And that's why I'm pushing to make people more aware of WIN-18446, a male birth control pill discovered in the 1970s.
Yet it is not authorized for prescription, despite that when taken properly, it similar severity of side effects compared to female birth control.
Yes, I fully agree that birth control is important for equality and gender rights.
And so, I ask you as a member of congress, pressure the FDA to allow WIN-18446 to be prescribed, so that even more people will have access to oral birth control.
And so, I ask you as a member of congress, pressure the FDA to allow WIN-18446 to be prescribed, so that even more people will have access to oral birth control.
May 12, 2025 at 8:16 PM
Yes, I fully agree that birth control is important for equality and gender rights.
And so, I ask you as a member of congress, pressure the FDA to allow WIN-18446 to be prescribed, so that even more people will have access to oral birth control.
And so, I ask you as a member of congress, pressure the FDA to allow WIN-18446 to be prescribed, so that even more people will have access to oral birth control.
Interesting. If that 57% is for the US specifically, then we can compare that to the percentage of Americans that are white.
Census data shows that ~75% of people in the US are white. So... Per-capita, there's less perpetrators of sexual assault.
Census data shows that ~75% of people in the US are white. So... Per-capita, there's less perpetrators of sexual assault.
May 11, 2025 at 3:29 AM
Interesting. If that 57% is for the US specifically, then we can compare that to the percentage of Americans that are white.
Census data shows that ~75% of people in the US are white. So... Per-capita, there's less perpetrators of sexual assault.
Census data shows that ~75% of people in the US are white. So... Per-capita, there's less perpetrators of sexual assault.
Excellent question.
Sometimes, problems are most visible from the bottom of the totem pole.
Sometimes, problems are most visible from the bottom of the totem pole.
April 30, 2025 at 8:02 PM
Excellent question.
Sometimes, problems are most visible from the bottom of the totem pole.
Sometimes, problems are most visible from the bottom of the totem pole.
Talking about... how using that specific word as a derogatory term reinforces the concept of toxic masculinity?
It's a nuanced take, which is why it took three posts.
It's not pro incel, it's pro 'pick a different word for this, it's counterproductive'
It's a nuanced take, which is why it took three posts.
It's not pro incel, it's pro 'pick a different word for this, it's counterproductive'
March 14, 2025 at 1:28 AM
Talking about... how using that specific word as a derogatory term reinforces the concept of toxic masculinity?
It's a nuanced take, which is why it took three posts.
It's not pro incel, it's pro 'pick a different word for this, it's counterproductive'
It's a nuanced take, which is why it took three posts.
It's not pro incel, it's pro 'pick a different word for this, it's counterproductive'
By voting to allow the CR's cloture, you are giving Trump the power to shut down Social Security.
You're not helping the Seniors. You're stabbing America in the back.
You're not helping the Seniors. You're stabbing America in the back.
March 14, 2025 at 1:27 AM
By voting to allow the CR's cloture, you are giving Trump the power to shut down Social Security.
You're not helping the Seniors. You're stabbing America in the back.
You're not helping the Seniors. You're stabbing America in the back.
oR iT mIgHt bE bEcAuSe TaLkInG lIkE tHiS iS hArD tO rEaD, and they simply don't want alternating case messages showing up in their timeline.
March 13, 2025 at 1:29 PM
oR iT mIgHt bE bEcAuSe TaLkInG lIkE tHiS iS hArD tO rEaD, and they simply don't want alternating case messages showing up in their timeline.
This contradiction of views will often lead people to disregard the person stating them as a hypocrite.
March 7, 2025 at 2:13 PM
This contradiction of views will often lead people to disregard the person stating them as a hypocrite.
Generally, those I've heard to be most vocally against incels are ALSO those who keep talking about how we need to deconstruct toxic masculinity, and that toxic masculinity is based around the 'lie that sexual activity is a measure of worth of a man'.
March 7, 2025 at 2:13 PM
Generally, those I've heard to be most vocally against incels are ALSO those who keep talking about how we need to deconstruct toxic masculinity, and that toxic masculinity is based around the 'lie that sexual activity is a measure of worth of a man'.
Yeah, the Mana series just has such bright and vivid worlds. It's a nice change of pace from the dark and gloomy fantasy worlds.
February 19, 2025 at 3:10 PM
Yeah, the Mana series just has such bright and vivid worlds. It's a nice change of pace from the dark and gloomy fantasy worlds.
What happens if a federated client disobeys the reply restriction?
February 18, 2025 at 7:53 PM
What happens if a federated client disobeys the reply restriction?
While also using the word "Incel", a word that's parts mean "person unable to find a sexual partner" to mean "awful man".
Doing that only further cements in men that their value is measured in number of sexual partners.
Doing that only further cements in men that their value is measured in number of sexual partners.
February 16, 2025 at 1:32 AM
While also using the word "Incel", a word that's parts mean "person unable to find a sexual partner" to mean "awful man".
Doing that only further cements in men that their value is measured in number of sexual partners.
Doing that only further cements in men that their value is measured in number of sexual partners.