Biden admins war on crypto was a hot button issue for a segment of voters that own crypto. It drove a fair amount of former dems to vote gop this time.
See polls paradigm conducted on this, but also eg this article www.cbsnews.com/news/who-wer...
Biden admins war on crypto was a hot button issue for a segment of voters that own crypto. It drove a fair amount of former dems to vote gop this time.
See polls paradigm conducted on this, but also eg this article www.cbsnews.com/news/who-wer...
But when a new technology comes around and old laws don’t cover this to the full extent, the usual path is to create new laws and regulations to provide clarity for all.
But when a new technology comes around and old laws don’t cover this to the full extent, the usual path is to create new laws and regulations to provide clarity for all.
Another problem is that current law ask things from crypto protocols that they can’t comply with. Like how can a smart contract create an annual report?
Another problem is that current law ask things from crypto protocols that they can’t comply with. Like how can a smart contract create an annual report?
More than happy to answer them if I can.
More than happy to answer them if I can.
New regulation is required to cover all this, current laws are not clear
New regulation is required to cover all this, current laws are not clear
Are these not real users using a product/service?
Maybe you need to look a bit further than you have done so far
Are these not real users using a product/service?
Maybe you need to look a bit further than you have done so far
They either don’t care to be factual or don’t have a clue. In both cases they’re in no position to meaningful push back on pro or anti-crypto talking points. Same for ai I guess
They either don’t care to be factual or don’t have a clue. In both cases they’re in no position to meaningful push back on pro or anti-crypto talking points. Same for ai I guess
That said, many companies have value because of non-tangible assets like network effects, user base, etc. Same goes for crypto.
And various crypto also provides yield, similar to dividends.
That said, many companies have value because of non-tangible assets like network effects, user base, etc. Same goes for crypto.
And various crypto also provides yield, similar to dividends.
How formerly critical banking CEO’s and journalists, eg in the FT, are begrudgingly coming around.
Being anti-crypto is really like being anti-internet in the 90’s. A losing position
How formerly critical banking CEO’s and journalists, eg in the FT, are begrudgingly coming around.
Being anti-crypto is really like being anti-internet in the 90’s. A losing position
When it brings things like this? finance.yahoo.com/news/buenos-...
When it brings things like this? finance.yahoo.com/news/buenos-...
Maybe try to do some research yourself to see why they changed their mind?
This way you
Maybe try to do some research yourself to see why they changed their mind?
This way you
One example: saying it pays no dividends. Technically that’s true, but various cryptocurrencies pay yield, which is very similar in that it gives you a return by passively holding it.
One example: saying it pays no dividends. Technically that’s true, but various cryptocurrencies pay yield, which is very similar in that it gives you a return by passively holding it.
Finally, the whole premise that it’s mainly used for illicit, criminal practices, as the OP stated, has been debunked many times by officials. Even the crypto hating Biden admin acknowledged this in reports and testimony before congress.
Anyone still saying this is just pandering
Finally, the whole premise that it’s mainly used for illicit, criminal practices, as the OP stated, has been debunked many times by officials. Even the crypto hating Biden admin acknowledged this in reports and testimony before congress.
Anyone still saying this is just pandering
And I wanted to show just one example outside the financial realm of crypto.
And I wanted to show just one example outside the financial realm of crypto.
Without it “a malicious issuer could backdate documents".
Saying it’s for convenience is like saying a notary timestamping a property deed is for convenience.
Without it “a malicious issuer could backdate documents".
Saying it’s for convenience is like saying a notary timestamping a property deed is for convenience.
This solution uses cryptocurrency for security. Zk-tech works without it, but it would make the digital-id less fraud proof?
And yes, it’s new. But do you think it’s valuable?
This solution uses cryptocurrency for security. Zk-tech works without it, but it would make the digital-id less fraud proof?
And yes, it’s new. But do you think it’s valuable?