@longowls.bsky.social
Another successful stalemate
October 22, 2025 at 2:53 AM
Another successful stalemate
[Gasp] But I thought they were the ones who “really” cared about kids with autism…
October 15, 2025 at 9:40 PM
[Gasp] But I thought they were the ones who “really” cared about kids with autism…
This isn’t about that.
Ahlqvist is very strong. But i believe neither Gustavson or Havdahl specifically tested that hypothesis. Others?
IMO that’s not enough to say we’ve “proven” no causal connection.
“Best evidence indicates no causal connection” works, but it’s not exactly headline worthy.
Ahlqvist is very strong. But i believe neither Gustavson or Havdahl specifically tested that hypothesis. Others?
IMO that’s not enough to say we’ve “proven” no causal connection.
“Best evidence indicates no causal connection” works, but it’s not exactly headline worthy.
September 24, 2025 at 5:23 AM
This isn’t about that.
Ahlqvist is very strong. But i believe neither Gustavson or Havdahl specifically tested that hypothesis. Others?
IMO that’s not enough to say we’ve “proven” no causal connection.
“Best evidence indicates no causal connection” works, but it’s not exactly headline worthy.
Ahlqvist is very strong. But i believe neither Gustavson or Havdahl specifically tested that hypothesis. Others?
IMO that’s not enough to say we’ve “proven” no causal connection.
“Best evidence indicates no causal connection” works, but it’s not exactly headline worthy.
I think “unproven” is accurate. I don’t think any of those authors would say that they’ve “proven” there is no causal connection. Their studies did not find a causal connection. That’s not the same thing.
September 23, 2025 at 5:43 PM
I think “unproven” is accurate. I don’t think any of those authors would say that they’ve “proven” there is no causal connection. Their studies did not find a causal connection. That’s not the same thing.
This feels right. I believe they intended this.
September 5, 2025 at 5:06 AM
This feels right. I believe they intended this.
You made it happen!
September 3, 2025 at 10:03 PM
You made it happen!
It’s *adorable* that you think that’s possible for him or his followers.
August 28, 2025 at 1:24 AM
It’s *adorable* that you think that’s possible for him or his followers.
Was Socrates actually illiterate? Seems unlikely. This site suggests he was taught to read & write.
iep.utm.edu/socrates/
100% agree with your point, tho
iep.utm.edu/socrates/
100% agree with your point, tho
Socrates | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
iep.utm.edu
August 26, 2025 at 4:41 PM
Was Socrates actually illiterate? Seems unlikely. This site suggests he was taught to read & write.
iep.utm.edu/socrates/
100% agree with your point, tho
iep.utm.edu/socrates/
100% agree with your point, tho
Remember earlier this year when we said the pres could remove members of independent bodies but told you not to worry about the Fed because of its “unique history”? Wellllll…
August 26, 2025 at 12:50 PM
Remember earlier this year when we said the pres could remove members of independent bodies but told you not to worry about the Fed because of its “unique history”? Wellllll…
Came here to say that…
August 20, 2025 at 10:26 PM
Came here to say that…
Still think about the 60 yo dude who walked past me in mile 18 in cargo shorts and a seemingly bone dry polo in my first marathon.
August 6, 2025 at 6:50 PM
Still think about the 60 yo dude who walked past me in mile 18 in cargo shorts and a seemingly bone dry polo in my first marathon.
Wow. You’d be willing to stake your ENTIRE professional reputation on it?
But what about ALL your Academy Awards and ALL your Super Bowl rings?
Would you risk them, too?
But what about ALL your Academy Awards and ALL your Super Bowl rings?
Would you risk them, too?
July 23, 2025 at 8:39 PM
Wow. You’d be willing to stake your ENTIRE professional reputation on it?
But what about ALL your Academy Awards and ALL your Super Bowl rings?
Would you risk them, too?
But what about ALL your Academy Awards and ALL your Super Bowl rings?
Would you risk them, too?
…or phased out altogether. After all, “it’s a Ponzi scheme.”
July 16, 2025 at 9:42 PM
…or phased out altogether. After all, “it’s a Ponzi scheme.”
“The person supported by more than half the voters wins.”
“Oh, and you can vote your conscience.”
“Oh, and you can vote your conscience.”
June 27, 2025 at 4:41 AM
“The person supported by more than half the voters wins.”
“Oh, and you can vote your conscience.”
“Oh, and you can vote your conscience.”
Agree with 1st sentence. Completely disagree with the notion that the internet “didn’t really affect this phenomenon.”
May 26, 2025 at 4:08 PM
Agree with 1st sentence. Completely disagree with the notion that the internet “didn’t really affect this phenomenon.”
Nah. It’s a factor, but so is the existence of this space - and car culture did not cause the internet.
May 26, 2025 at 2:21 PM
Nah. It’s a factor, but so is the existence of this space - and car culture did not cause the internet.
It's a much greater indictment of our retreat from irl community but also car culture, I suppose.
May 25, 2025 at 6:42 PM
It's a much greater indictment of our retreat from irl community but also car culture, I suppose.
Policy CAN cut through, and the IRA probably would've cut through eventually. But the IRA needed time for the effects to show.
What they NEEDED to win immediately was MINIMUM WAGE. The misinfo machine wasn't going to win that battle. With another 4 years to mature, IRA might've survived.
What they NEEDED to win immediately was MINIMUM WAGE. The misinfo machine wasn't going to win that battle. With another 4 years to mature, IRA might've survived.
May 23, 2025 at 6:40 PM
Policy CAN cut through, and the IRA probably would've cut through eventually. But the IRA needed time for the effects to show.
What they NEEDED to win immediately was MINIMUM WAGE. The misinfo machine wasn't going to win that battle. With another 4 years to mature, IRA might've survived.
What they NEEDED to win immediately was MINIMUM WAGE. The misinfo machine wasn't going to win that battle. With another 4 years to mature, IRA might've survived.
Dickens to Fitzgerald
May 8, 2025 at 6:02 PM
Dickens to Fitzgerald
Everyone should just hold their internet win of the day submissions for tomorrow
May 7, 2025 at 4:37 PM
Everyone should just hold their internet win of the day submissions for tomorrow
April 24, 2025 at 1:11 PM
He’s 3rd on every list I’ve seen. Even if he was 1st, what’s likely to generate more future sales, having the same team win over & over - when fans already have jerseys & everyone else is sick of them - or having a new champ every year and you get those sweet bandwagon sales?
January 29, 2025 at 9:10 PM
He’s 3rd on every list I’ve seen. Even if he was 1st, what’s likely to generate more future sales, having the same team win over & over - when fans already have jerseys & everyone else is sick of them - or having a new champ every year and you get those sweet bandwagon sales?
Great work. Literally no one can think that system makes sense when the defendant is acquitted. They clearly just think it won’t happen to anyone they care about.
TBC, I think it’s bad even if guilty.
TBC, I think it’s bad even if guilty.
January 16, 2025 at 9:05 PM
Great work. Literally no one can think that system makes sense when the defendant is acquitted. They clearly just think it won’t happen to anyone they care about.
TBC, I think it’s bad even if guilty.
TBC, I think it’s bad even if guilty.