Leonidas Nikolai Kaufmann
@lnkaufmann.bsky.social
Calma, Big Bucha.
October 10, 2024 at 12:56 AM
Calma, Big Bucha.
Não aconteceu nada.
October 9, 2024 at 3:23 PM
Não aconteceu nada.
Então não é rede social. Eu tenho conta no Discord desde o lançamento, a senhora quer me escolarizar sobre como esse programa de computador funciona?
October 9, 2024 at 12:01 PM
Então não é rede social. Eu tenho conta no Discord desde o lançamento, a senhora quer me escolarizar sobre como esse programa de computador funciona?
1. Redes sociais são sites como Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc. Você cria publicações, as pessoas dão "like", compartilham e comentam.
2. Discord é um sucessor ao TeamSpeak. A ideia é entrar em servidores para conversar com as pessoas num bate papo por texto ou por voz.
2. Discord é um sucessor ao TeamSpeak. A ideia é entrar em servidores para conversar com as pessoas num bate papo por texto ou por voz.
October 9, 2024 at 11:59 AM
1. Redes sociais são sites como Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc. Você cria publicações, as pessoas dão "like", compartilham e comentam.
2. Discord é um sucessor ao TeamSpeak. A ideia é entrar em servidores para conversar com as pessoas num bate papo por texto ou por voz.
2. Discord é um sucessor ao TeamSpeak. A ideia é entrar em servidores para conversar com as pessoas num bate papo por texto ou por voz.
Discord nem é rede social, colega. Você assiste Rede Bobo?
October 9, 2024 at 6:19 AM
Discord nem é rede social, colega. Você assiste Rede Bobo?
Sure, governor.
I gave emphasis to your usage of "if" because it implies you don't believe in God. And if you don't, there's no rhyme or reason behind your idea of writing theological assertions on God. I certainly don't believe all that much in God either, but I don't pretend I'm a theologian.
I gave emphasis to your usage of "if" because it implies you don't believe in God. And if you don't, there's no rhyme or reason behind your idea of writing theological assertions on God. I certainly don't believe all that much in God either, but I don't pretend I'm a theologian.
October 8, 2024 at 11:08 PM
Sure, governor.
I gave emphasis to your usage of "if" because it implies you don't believe in God. And if you don't, there's no rhyme or reason behind your idea of writing theological assertions on God. I certainly don't believe all that much in God either, but I don't pretend I'm a theologian.
I gave emphasis to your usage of "if" because it implies you don't believe in God. And if you don't, there's no rhyme or reason behind your idea of writing theological assertions on God. I certainly don't believe all that much in God either, but I don't pretend I'm a theologian.
Google the results of the 1932 Parliamentary election in Weimar Germany. Even fascists have a say in the democratic political platform you defend, not in mine. I wholly agree that it's okay to ban some political parties; they don't even have to go to such extremes to qualify for a ban.
October 8, 2024 at 10:02 PM
Google the results of the 1932 Parliamentary election in Weimar Germany. Even fascists have a say in the democratic political platform you defend, not in mine. I wholly agree that it's okay to ban some political parties; they don't even have to go to such extremes to qualify for a ban.
None. I'm not enough to the left to be socialist, so it's not really a burden for me to say it that about socialism.
But even when those same left-wing states become authoritarian, that's less of a problem than poor political leadership. Authoritarianism is okay if it means the State is effective.
But even when those same left-wing states become authoritarian, that's less of a problem than poor political leadership. Authoritarianism is okay if it means the State is effective.
October 8, 2024 at 10:00 PM
None. I'm not enough to the left to be socialist, so it's not really a burden for me to say it that about socialism.
But even when those same left-wing states become authoritarian, that's less of a problem than poor political leadership. Authoritarianism is okay if it means the State is effective.
But even when those same left-wing states become authoritarian, that's less of a problem than poor political leadership. Authoritarianism is okay if it means the State is effective.
I know I'm honest and frank about my politics. You're the one that isn't, it's always somebody else's fault when things go south in democratic system, like an "other", or a foreign factor.
Even the politicians in your dear democracy want power, politics are never about charity.
Even the politicians in your dear democracy want power, politics are never about charity.
October 8, 2024 at 9:56 PM
I know I'm honest and frank about my politics. You're the one that isn't, it's always somebody else's fault when things go south in democratic system, like an "other", or a foreign factor.
Even the politicians in your dear democracy want power, politics are never about charity.
Even the politicians in your dear democracy want power, politics are never about charity.
>you only know Ancient History
Do I? I've been to a history major before going to law school, governor. Democracy doesn't really need capitalism to downfall.
All political systems are subject to age, even the ones I might defend. You think that democracy only fails thanks to a third party.
Do I? I've been to a history major before going to law school, governor. Democracy doesn't really need capitalism to downfall.
All political systems are subject to age, even the ones I might defend. You think that democracy only fails thanks to a third party.
October 8, 2024 at 9:51 PM
>you only know Ancient History
Do I? I've been to a history major before going to law school, governor. Democracy doesn't really need capitalism to downfall.
All political systems are subject to age, even the ones I might defend. You think that democracy only fails thanks to a third party.
Do I? I've been to a history major before going to law school, governor. Democracy doesn't really need capitalism to downfall.
All political systems are subject to age, even the ones I might defend. You think that democracy only fails thanks to a third party.
So you prefer capitalist social democracy, even over a socialist dictatorship where the workers detain their means of production?
October 8, 2024 at 9:26 PM
So you prefer capitalist social democracy, even over a socialist dictatorship where the workers detain their means of production?
Então você tem preferência pelos partidos que não sejam o PL. Preferência é igual bunda, todo mundo tem.
October 8, 2024 at 9:25 PM
Então você tem preferência pelos partidos que não sejam o PL. Preferência é igual bunda, todo mundo tem.
Was capitalism there to foil Athenian democracy?
October 8, 2024 at 8:56 PM
Was capitalism there to foil Athenian democracy?
1. So are the creators of democratic political theories. Men built this world.
2. I'm actually pro-republic, but in a non-democratic way.
2. I'm actually pro-republic, but in a non-democratic way.
October 8, 2024 at 8:54 PM
1. So are the creators of democratic political theories. Men built this world.
2. I'm actually pro-republic, but in a non-democratic way.
2. I'm actually pro-republic, but in a non-democratic way.
So it's about George Lucas's convenience, then. Case closed.
October 8, 2024 at 8:51 PM
So it's about George Lucas's convenience, then. Case closed.
I prefer the winners of that particular war. I like the Americans and Russians better than the Germans, thanks.
October 8, 2024 at 8:47 PM
I prefer the winners of that particular war. I like the Americans and Russians better than the Germans, thanks.
1. And democracy doesn't piss people off, amirite? Nobody has to ever vote in the "less worse" of two options in every democratic election!
2. Marxist materialism has nothing to do with goody-two-shoes rebels from Star Wars.
2. Marxist materialism has nothing to do with goody-two-shoes rebels from Star Wars.
October 8, 2024 at 8:45 PM
1. And democracy doesn't piss people off, amirite? Nobody has to ever vote in the "less worse" of two options in every democratic election!
2. Marxist materialism has nothing to do with goody-two-shoes rebels from Star Wars.
2. Marxist materialism has nothing to do with goody-two-shoes rebels from Star Wars.
1. I do. Somebody was better than the king at the usage of force.
2. You imply that the rebels were a charity "helping" France and you imply that democracy is the way to go. The representative democracy they created 230 years ago is decaying, and it can't last forever.
2. You imply that the rebels were a charity "helping" France and you imply that democracy is the way to go. The representative democracy they created 230 years ago is decaying, and it can't last forever.
October 8, 2024 at 5:49 PM
1. I do. Somebody was better than the king at the usage of force.
2. You imply that the rebels were a charity "helping" France and you imply that democracy is the way to go. The representative democracy they created 230 years ago is decaying, and it can't last forever.
2. You imply that the rebels were a charity "helping" France and you imply that democracy is the way to go. The representative democracy they created 230 years ago is decaying, and it can't last forever.
Of course it's "worse", that's how George Lucas conveniently frames realpolitik. I am allowed to question his political views, thank you.
October 8, 2024 at 4:21 PM
Of course it's "worse", that's how George Lucas conveniently frames realpolitik. I am allowed to question his political views, thank you.
Lenora, back in the days of the Ancien Régime, the king Louis XIV of France inscribed in his cannons: "The King's last argument", in Latin.
That's what politics are. People with the bigger cannon are ultimately the ones with power, not the ones with words to say. I don't make the rules.
That's what politics are. People with the bigger cannon are ultimately the ones with power, not the ones with words to say. I don't make the rules.
October 8, 2024 at 4:19 PM
Lenora, back in the days of the Ancien Régime, the king Louis XIV of France inscribed in his cannons: "The King's last argument", in Latin.
That's what politics are. People with the bigger cannon are ultimately the ones with power, not the ones with words to say. I don't make the rules.
That's what politics are. People with the bigger cannon are ultimately the ones with power, not the ones with words to say. I don't make the rules.
Rebels in real life fight because they want power, not because they are morally good.
In African nations, there are plenty of rebels who will use child soldiers to further their interest in the battlefield. You need to stop having this binary view of politics.
In African nations, there are plenty of rebels who will use child soldiers to further their interest in the battlefield. You need to stop having this binary view of politics.
October 8, 2024 at 4:08 PM
Rebels in real life fight because they want power, not because they are morally good.
In African nations, there are plenty of rebels who will use child soldiers to further their interest in the battlefield. You need to stop having this binary view of politics.
In African nations, there are plenty of rebels who will use child soldiers to further their interest in the battlefield. You need to stop having this binary view of politics.