Prof. Lew (he/they)
@llewielew.bsky.social
What I can’t wrestle into words, I paint.
I’m not sure the math works on this one. How would have a shut down substantively increased Trumps executive power? Seems he’s already operating on full charge.
March 16, 2025 at 6:13 PM
I’m not sure the math works on this one. How would have a shut down substantively increased Trumps executive power? Seems he’s already operating on full charge.
We could count his scammy COVID treatments for a clean sweep.
March 16, 2025 at 3:22 AM
We could count his scammy COVID treatments for a clean sweep.
Trump’s ideological framework couldn’t be more different, but his collusions with power and his claims to grab hold of untouchable problems is similar.
Worth noting, many POC died at Jonestown. Like the way Trump is hurting blue collar supporters now? Seems that’s where we’re headed.
Worth noting, many POC died at Jonestown. Like the way Trump is hurting blue collar supporters now? Seems that’s where we’re headed.
March 16, 2025 at 1:55 AM
Trump’s ideological framework couldn’t be more different, but his collusions with power and his claims to grab hold of untouchable problems is similar.
Worth noting, many POC died at Jonestown. Like the way Trump is hurting blue collar supporters now? Seems that’s where we’re headed.
Worth noting, many POC died at Jonestown. Like the way Trump is hurting blue collar supporters now? Seems that’s where we’re headed.
Jones gained political power with elites because he could deliver huge blocks of votes at the polls. He mobilized the base.
He mobilized the base by explicitly addressing problems that do one else would, mainly racial inequity.
He mobilized the base by explicitly addressing problems that do one else would, mainly racial inequity.
March 16, 2025 at 1:51 AM
Jones gained political power with elites because he could deliver huge blocks of votes at the polls. He mobilized the base.
He mobilized the base by explicitly addressing problems that do one else would, mainly racial inequity.
He mobilized the base by explicitly addressing problems that do one else would, mainly racial inequity.
Honestly, I get more Stalin vibes. Internal purges were the trade mark of his last administration.
March 15, 2025 at 10:18 PM
Honestly, I get more Stalin vibes. Internal purges were the trade mark of his last administration.
What areas are those exactly?!
March 14, 2025 at 11:51 PM
What areas are those exactly?!
YES is defined as endorsement. We get enough word salad from the Red Hats. Seriously disappointed.
March 14, 2025 at 11:50 PM
YES is defined as endorsement. We get enough word salad from the Red Hats. Seriously disappointed.
I can’t think of a better time to practice disruption and absurdity in response to aggression than now.
March 12, 2025 at 1:24 PM
I can’t think of a better time to practice disruption and absurdity in response to aggression than now.
However, that’s not anywhere in the text. The text is all about disrupting the retribution narrative of the aggressor in a way that cannot be confused with capitulation.
March 12, 2025 at 1:22 PM
However, that’s not anywhere in the text. The text is all about disrupting the retribution narrative of the aggressor in a way that cannot be confused with capitulation.