Elizabeth Gregory
@lizgregory.bsky.social
🇨🇦 MD/PhD candidate in the NINET lab at UBC | Vanier Scholar | Interested in non-invasive brain stimulation. Big fan of dogs and science. She/hers.
So cool!! Great work Hallee 😮🤩
November 12, 2025 at 8:13 PM
So cool!! Great work Hallee 😮🤩
Reposted by Elizabeth Gregory
Over 40% of brain-behavior effects were likely overestimated due to motion. There was no correlation between a trait’s a priori correlation with motion and its motion overestimation score. Calculating the motion impact score was necessary to discover the problematic brain-behavior effects!
September 30, 2025 at 7:42 PM
Over 40% of brain-behavior effects were likely overestimated due to motion. There was no correlation between a trait’s a priori correlation with motion and its motion overestimation score. Calculating the motion impact score was necessary to discover the problematic brain-behavior effects!
Reposted by Elizabeth Gregory
6/ Indeed, to achieve high prediction performance, 10-min scans are cost inefficient. In most scenarios, the optimal scan time is ≥20 min. On average, 30-min scans are the most cost effective, yielding 22% savings over 10 min scans. Overshooting is cheaper than undershooting ...
July 17, 2025 at 1:36 AM
6/ Indeed, to achieve high prediction performance, 10-min scans are cost inefficient. In most scenarios, the optimal scan time is ≥20 min. On average, 30-min scans are the most cost effective, yielding 22% savings over 10 min scans. Overshooting is cheaper than undershooting ...