Once you set aside the particular thing being ignored and depersonalize it, it is much easier to notice that the dems are not bad at what they do; incompetence does not explain their behavior

You do not fuck up on

Trans stuff (just stuff... all of it)
Gaza
Voting for Trump picks
Bills

by accident

None of this is new info. Yarvin, et al are not somehow exposed here. Is she correct? Yes. But it's not some conspiracy. She is barely speaking in clearer terms than when on-air, and basically still IS on-air, and I will take such srsly when they are finally ready to fight. Actually fight.

I wish I could say that Reid is on to something, but the real truth is that someone else is more likely onto something and she is more likely doing what she has always done: Platform to liberals in the way liberals want to be platformed to.

If it's that important, why aren't you telling Newsom he should improve?

Can both mouths sing? It could very well sing bass and tenor simultaneously

This person never meets with students more than an avg of once a month and just said "the reason ppl work here, they say, the *compelling why,* is -- the students."

Yeah, that's definitely my reason, nothing to do with not starving to death and a dry job market otherwise

Or just racists and "crime" is code for "brown/queer/female/poor."

Also, if the left is so anti-man, why is it that the right is so mad at us for liking Pedro Pascal? Bc there it is, my entire Dunt-style article about How To Be A Man: "Pedro Pascal. The end."

As for the get-ahead incentive, that doesn't contradict what I said, in a functional sense.

More like co-opted and subverted by rightwing think tanks. It's an accurate, value-neutral term for certain outlets. Some even self describe as such.

@iandunt.bsky.social

hey btw, ^this^ is the kind of person who agreed with your piece.

That should be concerning. It doesn't, by itself, mean you were wrong ofc, but consider that you felt you had to block a lot of progressives, engaged no critique, and impressed rightwing incels.

Ronald Dworkin, calling the entire legal system vibes-based, since the mid 1900s, seeing 2025 hot takes: "am I a joke to you ppl?"

Ronald Dworkin, calling the entire legal system vibes-based, since the mid 1900s, seeing 2025 hot takes: "am I a joke to you ppl?"

And all this boils to communications because, without nihilistic (in literal sense) orders of magnitude improvement on the left at counterleadership, fascism controls a machine beyond their wildest dreams; they can nullify media, cause war, instigate inter-minority hate... with the push of a button.

And I don't mean this in a blue maga, liberal hyperbole "fuck trump" way. Liberalism salivates, and is designed and fully ready, for takeover. Trump dying or losing would not fix this. There are pockets and networks of hope in the US, especially among minorities, but the system can't be fixed.

It is not hyperbole imo to take a srs look at Hitler Germany and observe that Trump America is poised to do unimaginably more, not just collateral dmg, but the actual global hegemonic regime that Nazism idolized (note: Trump, the person, largely irrelevant; just the Capital he reps).

Capital deployed Trump, likely, as a test but it was so successful it was doing self harm but to them it is worth it now.

Telecommunications megamachines are to the point they dont need demes to feel control. They can entirely fake it, and lie faster than demes can organize.

Michelle Wolfe nailed the media, including liberal media, right to the wall.

They love Trump. He saved them.

I think that answer that it's combo of fear + favor is good, in regard to why headlines/media struggles to cover trump honestly, but it's also a third problem that many don't want to recognize. Not just CEOs, but even editors and journos like Trump. They sincerely do. It needs to be reckoned with.