Yes, except for balance in the news. I want this part back: "required the holders of broadcast licenses both to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that fairly reflected differing viewpoints."
Yes, except for balance in the news. I want this part back: "required the holders of broadcast licenses both to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that fairly reflected differing viewpoints."
None. It was an example showing that the FD had nothing to do with censorship before it was dropped by the FCC.
None. It was an example showing that the FD had nothing to do with censorship before it was dropped by the FCC.
HBO had nudity/profanity/softcore when it launched in 1972 long before the FCC removed the regulation.
Cable had more leeway regarding content because it was/is a subscription not free over the airwaves.
HBO had nudity/profanity/softcore when it launched in 1972 long before the FCC removed the regulation.
Cable had more leeway regarding content because it was/is a subscription not free over the airwaves.
Don't make things up.
Don't make things up.
SCOTUS said it's constitutional. I said reinstated & updated.
What part has you so tantrummy?
SCOTUS said it's constitutional. I said reinstated & updated.
What part has you so tantrummy?
... for billionaires
They point at how terrible the Rs are then gaslight us by chasing them to The Center™ and then doing it again&again&again♾️.
... for billionaires
They point at how terrible the Rs are then gaslight us by chasing them to The Center™ and then doing it again&again&again♾️.
*walks away dry heaving at the mental image*
*walks away dry heaving at the mental image*