The accessible version of the paper is here: 81e63e3e-0cc6-43dc-aa7c-35f441eca471.filesusr.com/ugd/f72a2f_e...
Original link here: www.ingentaconnect.com/content/cuny...

A table summarizing the pathways can be found here 6/6

Understanding these historical pathways to authoritarian capitalism provides insight on contemporary democratic backsliding and right-wing populism in the U.S. and Europe. 5/6

Conversely, when authoritarianism preceded capitalism, late industrializing states with weak business and working classes pursued developmental agendas by exercising autonomy over capital and repressing labor. 4/6

We argue that the timing of capitalism's establishment relative to authoritarianism matters. When capitalism preceded authoritarianism, autocracy arose from fear of communist redistribution or backlash against neoliberalism, with governments appealing to business and labor interests. 3/6

What accounts for the emergence of authoritarian capitalism in industrialized democracies, post-communist countries, and emerging market economies? We identify three pathways to authoritarian capitalism: anti-redistribution, post-communist backlash to neoliberalism, and late industrialization. 2/6

I have some previous works on local electronics industry in China but not on the semiconductor industry specifically. And i have an article on tech war and China but not on the local level…

Students at UMass Amherst, UMass Boston, Harvard, Univ. of Michigan, UCLA, Arizona State, Cornell, Univ. of Oregon, Univ. of Texas, North Carolina State, Univ. of Colorado, Univ. of Minnesota, Minnesota State and more have all had visas revoked with NO DUE PROCESS (links below)

In sum, although China strongly criticized such a policy, its influence on China is not likely to be significant compared to its influence on the U.S. 6/6

Fourth, whether this policy can enhance U.S. firms' incentives to invest in their own country remains to be seen (maybe it will), although personally, I am quite doubtful due to the unsettled political environment under the current administration. 5/6

Third, the U.S firms' investment in China would be affected by such policies, forcing them to choose between opportunities to expand markets in China and following the government's priorities. 4/6

Second, China's reliance on inward FDI (including U.S. investment) has significantly declined. The typical argument that China uses FDI to access critical technology also becomes less relevant, as China has made major progress on indigenous innovation. 3/6

First, since 2017, we have seen a sharp fall in China's outward investment in the U.S. with institutions like CFIUS playing active roles in scrutinizing investment coming to the U.S. This round emphasized critical technology and infrastructure. But I do not expect to see any surprising changes. 2/6