Linda Kent
@lindakentny.bsky.social
Complainist. Artist. Linguist.
Never Sit Down.
Never Shut Up.
Can't complain? I can help you with that!
Teacher all over US, Seoul, Busan, Beijing...Spanish other language. Avocation: teeth-gnashing
Never Sit Down.
Never Shut Up.
Can't complain? I can help you with that!
Teacher all over US, Seoul, Busan, Beijing...Spanish other language. Avocation: teeth-gnashing
You've not "clearly" seen more than me, or you'd show me it. "I'm telling you" isn't evidence, or I could say "I'm telling you the current WH inhab't is a pedophile" without any prior hearing. You opine that witnesses lied, yet won't give an opinion on why he pardoned the rioters. Do you want mine?
October 31, 2025 at 11:38 PM
You've not "clearly" seen more than me, or you'd show me it. "I'm telling you" isn't evidence, or I could say "I'm telling you the current WH inhab't is a pedophile" without any prior hearing. You opine that witnesses lied, yet won't give an opinion on why he pardoned the rioters. Do you want mine?
We can discuss something else -- term limits, for example -- but I've said many times now that I felt the hearings we both saw provided ample evidence, and I acknowledge that you felt it false; then you claim to have info I should know that would refute the hearing, but not shown me it.
Later?
Later?
October 31, 2025 at 10:29 PM
We can discuss something else -- term limits, for example -- but I've said many times now that I felt the hearings we both saw provided ample evidence, and I acknowledge that you felt it false; then you claim to have info I should know that would refute the hearing, but not shown me it.
Later?
Later?
PS to my prev reply: Saying people lied or the FBI did this or that, or other claims are not evidence. They are opinion.
Congress - both parties - compiled & organized evidence, testimony, documents & presented it to us. They didn't just parade in and make accusations & rebuttals without evidence
Congress - both parties - compiled & organized evidence, testimony, documents & presented it to us. They didn't just parade in and make accusations & rebuttals without evidence
October 31, 2025 at 10:20 PM
PS to my prev reply: Saying people lied or the FBI did this or that, or other claims are not evidence. They are opinion.
Congress - both parties - compiled & organized evidence, testimony, documents & presented it to us. They didn't just parade in and make accusations & rebuttals without evidence
Congress - both parties - compiled & organized evidence, testimony, documents & presented it to us. They didn't just parade in and make accusations & rebuttals without evidence
You're want the videos of evidence we BOTH ALREADY WATCHED?
You've no evidence re people lying, no video of FBI telling people to attack the Capitol. "if you believe he did you should be able to produce the evidence".
You didn't answer simple Q.: Why do you think current inhab't pardoned rioters?
You've no evidence re people lying, no video of FBI telling people to attack the Capitol. "if you believe he did you should be able to produce the evidence".
You didn't answer simple Q.: Why do you think current inhab't pardoned rioters?
October 31, 2025 at 10:12 PM
You're want the videos of evidence we BOTH ALREADY WATCHED?
You've no evidence re people lying, no video of FBI telling people to attack the Capitol. "if you believe he did you should be able to produce the evidence".
You didn't answer simple Q.: Why do you think current inhab't pardoned rioters?
You've no evidence re people lying, no video of FBI telling people to attack the Capitol. "if you believe he did you should be able to produce the evidence".
You didn't answer simple Q.: Why do you think current inhab't pardoned rioters?
You imply there's information I don't know. You ask others to provide evidence while making claims of relevant information but not sharing it?
I was convinced by the evidence we both saw in full. You say it was lies. OK
When we accuse others - of "bald-faced lies", ex.- the burden of proof is on us
I was convinced by the evidence we both saw in full. You say it was lies. OK
When we accuse others - of "bald-faced lies", ex.- the burden of proof is on us
October 31, 2025 at 9:43 PM
You imply there's information I don't know. You ask others to provide evidence while making claims of relevant information but not sharing it?
I was convinced by the evidence we both saw in full. You say it was lies. OK
When we accuse others - of "bald-faced lies", ex.- the burden of proof is on us
I was convinced by the evidence we both saw in full. You say it was lies. OK
When we accuse others - of "bald-faced lies", ex.- the burden of proof is on us
This again? We both watched the full impeachment hearings and drew different conclusions.
You opined it was all lies.
I think it is your turn to identify just what you deem were lies and why.
Provide testimony/evidence you saw & can easily access yourself so we can agree that we disagree again?
You opined it was all lies.
I think it is your turn to identify just what you deem were lies and why.
Provide testimony/evidence you saw & can easily access yourself so we can agree that we disagree again?
October 31, 2025 at 9:10 PM
This again? We both watched the full impeachment hearings and drew different conclusions.
You opined it was all lies.
I think it is your turn to identify just what you deem were lies and why.
Provide testimony/evidence you saw & can easily access yourself so we can agree that we disagree again?
You opined it was all lies.
I think it is your turn to identify just what you deem were lies and why.
Provide testimony/evidence you saw & can easily access yourself so we can agree that we disagree again?
I've long thought boycott of those companies who contribute to/own congress members to demand they telll donees to back x or lose donations would be more effective than us attempting to sway congressmembers dependent not on us but on big contributors & thus work more on their behalf than on ours
October 30, 2025 at 7:46 AM
I've long thought boycott of those companies who contribute to/own congress members to demand they telll donees to back x or lose donations would be more effective than us attempting to sway congressmembers dependent not on us but on big contributors & thus work more on their behalf than on ours
Yep Hitting them in the pocket best for fast attention.. And make corporation know big drop in customers/users/usage is due to a deliberate, concerted move by like-minded people objecting to/demanding something. The boycott of the corps who fired Kimmel cost them lots money and they quickly caved.
October 30, 2025 at 7:34 AM
Yep Hitting them in the pocket best for fast attention.. And make corporation know big drop in customers/users/usage is due to a deliberate, concerted move by like-minded people objecting to/demanding something. The boycott of the corps who fired Kimmel cost them lots money and they quickly caved.
1,000 protesters can yell and mock ICE agents and it's within their rights. Agents armed now (?) so if, fearing for their lives, they just shot them dead, they'd get fast pre-emptive pardon from current inhab't. He pardoned rioters, fraudsters, & eased prison conditions for a child trafficker, eh?
October 29, 2025 at 9:03 PM
1,000 protesters can yell and mock ICE agents and it's within their rights. Agents armed now (?) so if, fearing for their lives, they just shot them dead, they'd get fast pre-emptive pardon from current inhab't. He pardoned rioters, fraudsters, & eased prison conditions for a child trafficker, eh?
I await your reply for any response - vs. reaction - to any question I asked. Since we both watched the full impeachment and disagree on how to interpret what was presented, is there any point in us sifting through old videos now to support our interpretations in a "But what about...??!!" fashion?
October 29, 2025 at 8:49 PM
I await your reply for any response - vs. reaction - to any question I asked. Since we both watched the full impeachment and disagree on how to interpret what was presented, is there any point in us sifting through old videos now to support our interpretations in a "But what about...??!!" fashion?
Then, as I said, we'll just have to agree to disagree on how to interpret what we saw, read, and heard.
Agreeing to disagree is a fine American tradition.
I teach it to adult students learning to communicate in English at uni/professional level
I have to go to work, but we can resume this later?
Agreeing to disagree is a fine American tradition.
I teach it to adult students learning to communicate in English at uni/professional level
I have to go to work, but we can resume this later?
October 29, 2025 at 8:40 PM
Then, as I said, we'll just have to agree to disagree on how to interpret what we saw, read, and heard.
Agreeing to disagree is a fine American tradition.
I teach it to adult students learning to communicate in English at uni/professional level
I have to go to work, but we can resume this later?
Agreeing to disagree is a fine American tradition.
I teach it to adult students learning to communicate in English at uni/professional level
I have to go to work, but we can resume this later?
I know Republicans who believe that Democrats, while not necessarily communist/socialist/anarchist/atheist/terrorists/criminals/traitors/ "terrible people" etc, are responsibe for all the ills of our nation, but agree that he is rapidly deteriorating mentally.
Yesterday, one said he was a narcissist
Yesterday, one said he was a narcissist
October 29, 2025 at 8:29 PM
I know Republicans who believe that Democrats, while not necessarily communist/socialist/anarchist/atheist/terrorists/criminals/traitors/ "terrible people" etc, are responsibe for all the ills of our nation, but agree that he is rapidly deteriorating mentally.
Yesterday, one said he was a narcissist
Yesterday, one said he was a narcissist
And what new proof arising daily shows Biden was never the president? Just some daily example from the past seven days will do.
All I get is "autopen", which current inhab't has used, as he uses a teleprompter - and chairs to sit in, as he lately said he doesn't like to stand for long (why, I dunno)
All I get is "autopen", which current inhab't has used, as he uses a teleprompter - and chairs to sit in, as he lately said he doesn't like to stand for long (why, I dunno)
October 29, 2025 at 8:06 PM
And what new proof arising daily shows Biden was never the president? Just some daily example from the past seven days will do.
All I get is "autopen", which current inhab't has used, as he uses a teleprompter - and chairs to sit in, as he lately said he doesn't like to stand for long (why, I dunno)
All I get is "autopen", which current inhab't has used, as he uses a teleprompter - and chairs to sit in, as he lately said he doesn't like to stand for long (why, I dunno)
WHAT?? You did not watch the full impeachment, see the videos, the documents or hear the testimony?
If not,you should do so. Deliberate ignorance can land a person in trouble. Negligent ignorance can bring trouble too.
If you did watch it all, we'll just have to disagree on our interpretations.
If not,you should do so. Deliberate ignorance can land a person in trouble. Negligent ignorance can bring trouble too.
If you did watch it all, we'll just have to disagree on our interpretations.
October 29, 2025 at 7:57 PM
WHAT?? You did not watch the full impeachment, see the videos, the documents or hear the testimony?
If not,you should do so. Deliberate ignorance can land a person in trouble. Negligent ignorance can bring trouble too.
If you did watch it all, we'll just have to disagree on our interpretations.
If not,you should do so. Deliberate ignorance can land a person in trouble. Negligent ignorance can bring trouble too.
If you did watch it all, we'll just have to disagree on our interpretations.
Evading my question by asking another?
I'll answer yours. Will you answer mine?
Because of likely "vindictive prosecution" by revengeful current inhab't whose attempts at prosecuting certain people for embarrassing him now being considered in the courts on just that charge
OK, your turn to respond.
I'll answer yours. Will you answer mine?
Because of likely "vindictive prosecution" by revengeful current inhab't whose attempts at prosecuting certain people for embarrassing him now being considered in the courts on just that charge
OK, your turn to respond.
October 29, 2025 at 7:48 PM
Evading my question by asking another?
I'll answer yours. Will you answer mine?
Because of likely "vindictive prosecution" by revengeful current inhab't whose attempts at prosecuting certain people for embarrassing him now being considered in the courts on just that charge
OK, your turn to respond.
I'll answer yours. Will you answer mine?
Because of likely "vindictive prosecution" by revengeful current inhab't whose attempts at prosecuting certain people for embarrassing him now being considered in the courts on just that charge
OK, your turn to respond.
Also, do you truly believe current White House inhabitant is not mentally deteriorating and getting worse with each passing day?
Does he run things or are there powers behind the throne?
World leaders of Eur. China, Russia see he's got shrinking mental ability
Curious: Do you believe all he says?
Does he run things or are there powers behind the throne?
World leaders of Eur. China, Russia see he's got shrinking mental ability
Curious: Do you believe all he says?
October 29, 2025 at 7:35 PM
Also, do you truly believe current White House inhabitant is not mentally deteriorating and getting worse with each passing day?
Does he run things or are there powers behind the throne?
World leaders of Eur. China, Russia see he's got shrinking mental ability
Curious: Do you believe all he says?
Does he run things or are there powers behind the throne?
World leaders of Eur. China, Russia see he's got shrinking mental ability
Curious: Do you believe all he says?
PS to prev. post. Seriously, why DO you think he pardoned en masse without review?
October 29, 2025 at 7:23 PM
PS to prev. post. Seriously, why DO you think he pardoned en masse without review?
You believe Biden never prez. I believe, after many hours of videos, testimony & documentation, 1 ex. is inciting mob to attack a federal building, police, federal employees, & elected officials to stop the people's choice for president per election.
Or why do you think he pardoned without review?
Or why do you think he pardoned without review?
October 29, 2025 at 7:22 PM
You believe Biden never prez. I believe, after many hours of videos, testimony & documentation, 1 ex. is inciting mob to attack a federal building, police, federal employees, & elected officials to stop the people's choice for president per election.
Or why do you think he pardoned without review?
Or why do you think he pardoned without review?
True. But it is now a recognized saying to designate the attitude of very richest arrogant greedy selfish powerful people...and I think "cake" wasn't sweet cake but some cheapo by-product of breadmaking. Maybe, "Let them eat crusts" would have been better.
October 29, 2025 at 7:05 PM
True. But it is now a recognized saying to designate the attitude of very richest arrogant greedy selfish powerful people...and I think "cake" wasn't sweet cake but some cheapo by-product of breadmaking. Maybe, "Let them eat crusts" would have been better.
Arificial inelligence is authenically supid
October 29, 2025 at 8:44 AM
Arificial inelligence is authenically supid
Huh? And here we thought he just had to say, "I've already won my third term election --now accepting dontions for my 3rd inaugural ball in my goldpainted, faux-marble ballroom at my very own White House"
Because a dictator's words are instantly the law, just as dictated ( see "His word was law")
Because a dictator's words are instantly the law, just as dictated ( see "His word was law")
October 29, 2025 at 8:37 AM
Huh? And here we thought he just had to say, "I've already won my third term election --now accepting dontions for my 3rd inaugural ball in my goldpainted, faux-marble ballroom at my very own White House"
Because a dictator's words are instantly the law, just as dictated ( see "His word was law")
Because a dictator's words are instantly the law, just as dictated ( see "His word was law")
#5 surely most important. And maybe a post-game raffle. Prizes: baskets, muffin tins, and that timeless infinite-configuration compostable favorite toy, the cardboard box...
October 29, 2025 at 8:27 AM
#5 surely most important. And maybe a post-game raffle. Prizes: baskets, muffin tins, and that timeless infinite-configuration compostable favorite toy, the cardboard box...