Nick Webb
@limiteddof.bsky.social
Photographer, engineer, amateur chemist…
www.limiteddepthoffield.wordpress.com
'Life is what happens to you while you’re busy making other plans.' - John Lennon, 'Beautiful Boy'
📍Byleryky, Essex, England
www.limiteddepthoffield.wordpress.com
'Life is what happens to you while you’re busy making other plans.' - John Lennon, 'Beautiful Boy'
📍Byleryky, Essex, England
Yeah, to randomly call for some members of government to be taken to The Hague…very meaningful.
August 26, 2025 at 3:28 PM
Yeah, to randomly call for some members of government to be taken to The Hague…very meaningful.
Her meaningless post does this…,
August 26, 2025 at 3:03 PM
Her meaningless post does this…,
Read her post
It doesn’t call out the Tories does it?
As I say her post is meaningless and undermines her position. She could have made a far more impactful statement but chose not to
It doesn’t call out the Tories does it?
As I say her post is meaningless and undermines her position. She could have made a far more impactful statement but chose not to
August 26, 2025 at 2:18 PM
Read her post
It doesn’t call out the Tories does it?
As I say her post is meaningless and undermines her position. She could have made a far more impactful statement but chose not to
It doesn’t call out the Tories does it?
As I say her post is meaningless and undermines her position. She could have made a far more impactful statement but chose not to
Nor were the Nazis are Nuremberg - what’s your point because it does look like Zarah is supporting the Tories….
August 26, 2025 at 1:28 PM
Nor were the Nazis are Nuremberg - what’s your point because it does look like Zarah is supporting the Tories….
You can’t run public finances on a neo-liberal economy
Sorting that out will go a long way to sorting out the public finances sadly they don’t want to tax billionaires or limit CEO pay tax x times lowest pay worker
My taxes shouldn’t be used to subsidise a companies dividend payments via tax credits
Sorting that out will go a long way to sorting out the public finances sadly they don’t want to tax billionaires or limit CEO pay tax x times lowest pay worker
My taxes shouldn’t be used to subsidise a companies dividend payments via tax credits
August 26, 2025 at 1:23 PM
You can’t run public finances on a neo-liberal economy
Sorting that out will go a long way to sorting out the public finances sadly they don’t want to tax billionaires or limit CEO pay tax x times lowest pay worker
My taxes shouldn’t be used to subsidise a companies dividend payments via tax credits
Sorting that out will go a long way to sorting out the public finances sadly they don’t want to tax billionaires or limit CEO pay tax x times lowest pay worker
My taxes shouldn’t be used to subsidise a companies dividend payments via tax credits
I don’t think there are any easy solutions and real change takes time. But not wanting to implement a wealth tax is a massive failure of the government
August 26, 2025 at 1:13 PM
I don’t think there are any easy solutions and real change takes time. But not wanting to implement a wealth tax is a massive failure of the government
But why isn’t Zarah calling for the Tories to be prosecuted?
And my whole point is that Zarah’s post is without context and is therefore meaningless - you’ve taken more than one meaning from it.
And my whole point is that Zarah’s post is without context and is therefore meaningless - you’ve taken more than one meaning from it.
August 26, 2025 at 1:11 PM
But why isn’t Zarah calling for the Tories to be prosecuted?
And my whole point is that Zarah’s post is without context and is therefore meaningless - you’ve taken more than one meaning from it.
And my whole point is that Zarah’s post is without context and is therefore meaningless - you’ve taken more than one meaning from it.
I thought we’d established that Zarah’s post was about Saudi Arabia and Yemen.
That the Tories aren’t to be prosecuted.
By the was Rishi Sunak was PM at the end of the Tory government….
That the Tories aren’t to be prosecuted.
By the was Rishi Sunak was PM at the end of the Tory government….
August 26, 2025 at 12:37 PM
I thought we’d established that Zarah’s post was about Saudi Arabia and Yemen.
That the Tories aren’t to be prosecuted.
By the was Rishi Sunak was PM at the end of the Tory government….
That the Tories aren’t to be prosecuted.
By the was Rishi Sunak was PM at the end of the Tory government….
But no prosecution for the Tories who are also complicit….
No not gazza - stupid autocorrect I mean Gaza
No not gazza - stupid autocorrect I mean Gaza
August 26, 2025 at 12:29 PM
But no prosecution for the Tories who are also complicit….
No not gazza - stupid autocorrect I mean Gaza
No not gazza - stupid autocorrect I mean Gaza
But not Gazza
And not any Tories…you can really see who she and you support can’t you?
And not any Tories…you can really see who she and you support can’t you?
August 26, 2025 at 12:19 PM
But not Gazza
And not any Tories…you can really see who she and you support can’t you?
And not any Tories…you can really see who she and you support can’t you?
So that is what Zarah is posting about? Good to have sorted that one out.
Shame she didn’t call out the Tory PMs and Foreign Secretaries who were in place before Starmer and Lammy
Shame she didn’t call out the Tory PMs and Foreign Secretaries who were in place before Starmer and Lammy
August 26, 2025 at 11:57 AM
So that is what Zarah is posting about? Good to have sorted that one out.
Shame she didn’t call out the Tory PMs and Foreign Secretaries who were in place before Starmer and Lammy
Shame she didn’t call out the Tory PMs and Foreign Secretaries who were in place before Starmer and Lammy
No more complicit than Starmer’s support for Saudi Arabia
But we’re not calling for Starmer being sent to The Hague for that. At least that’s not what the post was about or was it? We don’t know there’s no context to the post this discussion is about.
But we’re not calling for Starmer being sent to The Hague for that. At least that’s not what the post was about or was it? We don’t know there’s no context to the post this discussion is about.
August 26, 2025 at 11:44 AM
No more complicit than Starmer’s support for Saudi Arabia
But we’re not calling for Starmer being sent to The Hague for that. At least that’s not what the post was about or was it? We don’t know there’s no context to the post this discussion is about.
But we’re not calling for Starmer being sent to The Hague for that. At least that’s not what the post was about or was it? We don’t know there’s no context to the post this discussion is about.
Why? Blair apologised for the British State’s complicity in the Irish Potato Famine….
August 26, 2025 at 8:51 AM
Why? Blair apologised for the British State’s complicity in the Irish Potato Famine….
So we’re taking about the numerous massacres of the civilian population in India before independence and nothing else?
August 26, 2025 at 7:59 AM
So we’re taking about the numerous massacres of the civilian population in India before independence and nothing else?
But she’s not calling for Starmer or Lammy being taken to The Hague for them.
So her out of context random statement is meaningless
So her out of context random statement is meaningless
August 26, 2025 at 7:58 AM
But she’s not calling for Starmer or Lammy being taken to The Hague for them.
So her out of context random statement is meaningless
So her out of context random statement is meaningless
Support of the Saudi Regime and its continued war in Yemen
But if they aren’t guilty of war crimes for that they’re not guilty of war crimes in Israel
But if they aren’t guilty of war crimes for that they’re not guilty of war crimes in Israel
August 26, 2025 at 7:45 AM
Support of the Saudi Regime and its continued war in Yemen
But if they aren’t guilty of war crimes for that they’re not guilty of war crimes in Israel
But if they aren’t guilty of war crimes for that they’re not guilty of war crimes in Israel
They’re still posting to the UK😁😁😁
August 26, 2025 at 7:42 AM
They’re still posting to the UK😁😁😁
So why not the weapons manufacturers? The ministers who authorise weapon exports? The civil servants involved?
It’s a random statement with no context, context can be inferred (and people will infer the wrong context) but why is she not providing context?
It’s a random statement with no context, context can be inferred (and people will infer the wrong context) but why is she not providing context?
August 26, 2025 at 7:40 AM
So why not the weapons manufacturers? The ministers who authorise weapon exports? The civil servants involved?
It’s a random statement with no context, context can be inferred (and people will infer the wrong context) but why is she not providing context?
It’s a random statement with no context, context can be inferred (and people will infer the wrong context) but why is she not providing context?
Because it is not part of any thread or has a follow up explaining why…..
August 25, 2025 at 9:05 PM
Because it is not part of any thread or has a follow up explaining why…..