Lilian Weber
@lilweb.bsky.social
Professor for Cognitive Modeling at the Institute for Cognitive Science in Osnabrück, Germany. Previously at Oxford & ETH Zurich.
Reposted by Lilian Weber
These, and other, studies show that you can decode task-related signals from many brain areas.
But wouldn't we need causal manipulations to conclude that the brain "uses" them?
For example, maybe we can decode equally well from two areas. But, only one impacts behaviour when inactivated.
But wouldn't we need causal manipulations to conclude that the brain "uses" them?
For example, maybe we can decode equally well from two areas. But, only one impacts behaviour when inactivated.
September 4, 2025 at 3:11 PM
These, and other, studies show that you can decode task-related signals from many brain areas.
But wouldn't we need causal manipulations to conclude that the brain "uses" them?
For example, maybe we can decode equally well from two areas. But, only one impacts behaviour when inactivated.
But wouldn't we need causal manipulations to conclude that the brain "uses" them?
For example, maybe we can decode equally well from two areas. But, only one impacts behaviour when inactivated.