liberaleftie.bsky.social
@liberaleftie.bsky.social
You can lead a horse to water....
November 11, 2025 at 3:23 PM
Trans rights activists attacked the venue.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
Trans activists vandalise FiLiA feminist conference in Brighton
The Bash Back action group said it vandalised a Brighton conference venue ahead of the event.
www.bbc.co.uk
November 11, 2025 at 3:04 PM
At least have some curiosity.
November 11, 2025 at 3:01 PM
Perhaps your prejudice has blindly you somewhat. I presented you with evidence (you will have to google FILIA and the Emma Humphrey Prize yourself).
November 11, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Nope. This is my experience.

Try to leave your bubble and talk to left wing feminists you label as bigots about it. You will find they aren't evil at all.
November 11, 2025 at 2:26 PM
I think your mate Nadia is showing the common misogynist abuse from TRAs
November 11, 2025 at 2:22 PM
Its not like that at all. All the major players are left wing feminists.

You are showing your misogyny again.
November 11, 2025 at 2:19 PM
I would of thought you wouldn't be so ignorant.

A good example of this is FILIA, Europe's biggest feminist conference. Hosted many GC feminist talks and awarded the Emma Humphries Prize to For Women Scotland.
November 11, 2025 at 2:01 PM
You accused me of bigotry and I responded. It was quite explicit.
November 11, 2025 at 1:50 PM
Given the prominence of left wing feminists in the trans debate your assertion that gender critical views are right wing is evidently wrong.
November 11, 2025 at 1:49 PM
Unprompted? You accused me of bigotry and I responded.

Why are you so keen to paint me as an evil bigot?

Is it it to justify your own misogyny?
November 11, 2025 at 1:12 PM
Not the accusation I was talking about. You accused me of finding evidence to support my opinion. Something you could not know.

Thinking women are human beings and have rights is not bigoted.
November 11, 2025 at 12:57 PM
I existed before this thread and have been thinking about this since 2016. I have looked at the evidence and come to an opinion.

You are just making unevidenced accusations.
November 11, 2025 at 12:28 PM
How on earth would you know that?
November 11, 2025 at 12:20 PM
LOL.

I am allowed to have thought about this before and to have formed an opinion based on evidence.
November 11, 2025 at 12:07 PM
okay
November 11, 2025 at 11:54 AM
I disagree. It is obviously relevant for understanding DSDs and why males with DSDs are not female.
November 11, 2025 at 11:53 AM
I am not claiming absolute truth. I am using the 'pathway' model because it provides the most accurate scientific description of the developmental sequence.

We need the concept of a typical pathway to logically identify and classify a DSD as a deviation or blockage at a specific point.
November 11, 2025 at 11:33 AM
You implied that the male competitors that finished with medals were actually female.

So I am just asserting the material reality that they are male for others to see. I'm obviously not going to change your opinion and I am not trying to.

Not sure why you are so obsessed with this thread.
November 11, 2025 at 11:28 AM
Saying they started the 'male pathway' simply describes the initial sequence of genetic steps that were set in motion by the SRY gene/XY configuration
November 11, 2025 at 11:18 AM
I agree that we shouldn't make moral judgments. I'm using the term 'pathway' purely in a descriptive, biological sense. Biology describes sequential steps: gene activation leads to organ formation, which leads to function.
November 11, 2025 at 11:18 AM
I'm here to voice my opinion so others can think about it.

Why are you doing it?
November 11, 2025 at 11:06 AM
They are on a pathway because of their genetic blueprint that initiated the developmental cascade to produce sperm.

The DSD is the blockage on the established path, not a failure to start it.
November 11, 2025 at 11:04 AM
I already did. I am here to voice my opinion.
November 11, 2025 at 11:00 AM