Matt Rementer
liamtransdemon.bsky.social
Matt Rementer
@liamtransdemon.bsky.social
Just here for stuff
Worth dropping Charbonnet for a flyer on Brashard Smith?
October 2, 2025 at 1:30 AM
Erickson, is now the time to pickup Brashard Smith? Do I drop Charbs for him?
October 1, 2025 at 9:01 PM
I love that these arguments only ever exist for the Eagles QB and no one else.
July 7, 2025 at 11:18 PM
Its never coming out. None of that info will ever be released voluntarily.
July 7, 2025 at 11:11 PM
Its realism. You see anything slowing down? I see no signs for optimism.
May 25, 2025 at 1:12 PM
They will only continue. These people arent stopping and theres no one stopping them.
May 24, 2025 at 10:40 PM
They won't and they wouldn't win anyway. These guys got everything sowed up so they arent going to get any pushback.
May 24, 2025 at 10:39 PM
It doesn't matter. No one is going to do anything. Its over.
May 24, 2025 at 10:38 PM
True. Just more misguided reasons to punish a team for having a play that works very well.
May 21, 2025 at 6:20 PM
22 teams that dont wanna defend
May 21, 2025 at 6:17 PM
Good. Hope Goodell puts a nasty curse on Buffalo. Hope they have horrible pace of play and stop running the play you voted to ban. Cowards.
May 21, 2025 at 6:15 PM
Why does that mean that the play is the problem? No one else besides Frankie Luvu decided to jump over the line and consistently mistime the snap count.
May 21, 2025 at 6:14 PM
What a surprise, more anti-Philly bias coming out of SB Nation. Sorry the Eagles winning the Super Bowl hurt so much but get over it.
May 21, 2025 at 6:13 PM
Wouldn't surprise me. They hate the running game and have been trying to stamp out the "3 yards and a cloud of dust" mentality for quite a while now.
May 21, 2025 at 6:10 PM
Maybe they can use the year to try to defend against it instead of conceding that they are helpless
May 21, 2025 at 5:06 PM
Packers should be embarrassed that they wanted to ban a play instead of trying to defend it. Lombardi would be sick to his stomach
May 21, 2025 at 5:05 PM
Winning by two scores isn't hanging on Ian
May 21, 2025 at 5:04 PM
As it should be
May 21, 2025 at 5:03 PM
No, they didn't keep the rule. You are talking about different rules for different formations and plays. Dont conflate the two
May 21, 2025 at 3:52 PM
Awesome that the guys that wanna ban it are honest and just say its cause the Eagkes are too good. Cause that's the only real reason its a discussion
May 21, 2025 at 3:50 PM
Its not hard to look up why the rule was removed. The refs barely enforced it because they found it too difficult.
May 20, 2025 at 10:50 PM
Or it wasn't called correctly for 85 years and was then gotten rid of.
May 20, 2025 at 10:49 PM
Defense playing dangerously is on them but even still, its not nearly as dangerous as people like to claim.
May 20, 2025 at 10:48 PM
Right, but also realize that the rule was rescinded because of its enforcement or lack thereof.
May 20, 2025 at 10:47 PM
So pace of play is a concern now? That's a new one. But I guess they need a new one since there is nothing to support the player safety claim. This is pathetic.
May 20, 2025 at 10:45 PM