Yes, and if you read my original reply you'll see it was obviously a tongue in cheek intentional conflation of EU weather with reinsurance for the US. Called a joke. Move on
May 8, 2025 at 7:43 PM
Yes, and if you read my original reply you'll see it was obviously a tongue in cheek intentional conflation of EU weather with reinsurance for the US. Called a joke. Move on
The fact is they are still extremely rare and very recent compared with US wildfires and storms, and truly tiny in terms of area impacted. There's no comparison, it's not even close. And the EU stuff is recent because of climate change, the US it's normal and getting worse because of climate change
May 8, 2025 at 7:34 PM
The fact is they are still extremely rare and very recent compared with US wildfires and storms, and truly tiny in terms of area impacted. There's no comparison, it's not even close. And the EU stuff is recent because of climate change, the US it's normal and getting worse because of climate change
Apparently Regan was the same about his cancer. After it was removed, he convinced himself that the cancer itself had the cancer, not him, therefore he'd never had cancer at all! Wow
May 8, 2025 at 7:24 PM
Apparently Regan was the same about his cancer. After it was removed, he convinced himself that the cancer itself had the cancer, not him, therefore he'd never had cancer at all! Wow
'he had asked his “people” to slow the testing down, please. At a White House press conference last week, he told reporters, “When you test, you create cases."'
May 8, 2025 at 7:13 PM
Sounds like familiar logic -
'he had asked his “people” to slow the testing down, please. At a White House press conference last week, he told reporters, “When you test, you create cases."'
And because it is effectively a consumption tax rather than income tax, it is regressive not progressive. The more you spend the more you pay, not the more you earn. Lower paid people spend virtually everything they earn and so their share of the tax burden is hundreds of times higher than the rich
April 28, 2025 at 9:41 PM
And because it is effectively a consumption tax rather than income tax, it is regressive not progressive. The more you spend the more you pay, not the more you earn. Lower paid people spend virtually everything they earn and so their share of the tax burden is hundreds of times higher than the rich