They want to destroy any and all public goods - anything that benefits humanity broadly has got to go.

Plus, they've been working hard for years to usher in a post-truth era. It's much easier to push your own evil agenda when you can make up your own set of 'facts'

Thank you for reporting on this! Are they collecting donations from individuals? (How do we support?)

The way I'm reading it, the 5-day lag in fig.S4 is more a reflection of study design than accuracy of PCR testing. We can't know the earliest date these subjects would've tested + bc that data wasn't collected by ONS.

Thanks for your reply! I appreciate all the time you put in. I'm still confused - I don't think the ONS survey was designed to answer the Q: "how soon after symptom onset does PCR give a + result". Subjects were only swabbed weekly. They might've had a + sooner, but that data wasn't collected...

Wishing your household member a speedy recovery and hoping for no forward transmission!

Would you be able to explain this graph in relation to supplementary figure 4? From fig 4, it looks like PCR has high sensitivity at day 0 of symptom onset (false negatives should be uncommon), and decreases as days pass. How does that reconcile with fig 5?

Forgive my ignorance, but I didn't realize that the negative imprinting effect of the flu vaccine was a confirmed phenomenon. I thought it was still an unproven theory... Could someone point me to the data?

Any specific dirt on nursing labour leaders? (ONA/CUPE/SEIU etc)

From what I've seen, there's a growing recognition among nurses that RNAO (our professional assoc, not union) is a sham. Most nurses join just for the liability insurance, but many are switching providers