Sherrone Moore cheats on his pregnant wife and is fired due to a morals clause. Trump cheats on his pregnant wife and is elevated to the presidency by a Christian constituency. 🙄
December 12, 2025 at 1:03 PM
Sherrone Moore cheats on his pregnant wife and is fired due to a morals clause. Trump cheats on his pregnant wife and is elevated to the presidency by a Christian constituency. 🙄
Reposted by L Elizabeth
The Groyper Wars
September 13, 2025 at 1:15 AM
The Groyper Wars
Reposted by L Elizabeth
Among many notable points: Judge Breyer concludes that to declare this a “rebellion,” as the administration would have it, would raise serious First Amendment concerns.
![from sporadic or impromptu, violence.® Nor is there evidence that any of the violent protesters were attempting to overthrow the government as a whole; the evidence is overwhelming that protesters gathered to protest a single issue-the immigration raids.
See, e.g., Espiritu Decl. Ex. D ("Friday evening, protesters marched in downtown L.A. condemning Friday's immigration raids."). While Defendants have pointed to several instances of violence, they have not identified a violent, armed, organized, open and avowed uprising against the government as a whole. The definition of rebellion is unmet.
Moreover, the Court is troubled by the implication inherent in Defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion. The U.S. Reports are chock-full of language explaining the importance of individuals' right to speak out against the government even when doing so is uncomfortable, even when doing so is provocative, even when doing so causes inconvenience. See, e.g., Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15, 24-25 (1972) (*To many, the immediate consequence of this freedom may often appear to be only verbal tumult, discord, and even offensive utterance. ... That the air may at times seem filled with verbal cacophony is, in this sense not a sign of weakness but of strength."); Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 508 ("But, in our system, undifferentiated fear or apprehension of disturbance is not enough to overcome the right to freedom of expression. Any departure from absolute regimentation may cause trouble. ... Any word spoken ... that deviates from the views of another person may start an argument or cause a disturbance. But our Constitution says we must take this risk.");
Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 536, 550-51 (rejecting the argument that a conviction for breach of the peace "should be sustained because of fear expressed by some [onlookers] that 'violence was…](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:wufsdxzvzx36d7wppganbvpw/bafkreibyro755nsaaimkuruyiv72wq73r2lze267id262t4iv4aydicwuu@jpeg)
![exercise" (quoting Watson v. City of Memphis, 373 U.S. 526, 535 (1963))); Texas v.
Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 414 (1989) ("If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable."); Hurley v. Irish-Am. Gay, Lesbian & Bisexual Grp. of Boston, Inc., 515 U.S. 557, 574 (1995) ("[T]he point of all speech protection [] is to shield just those choices of content that in someone's eyes are misguided, or even hurtful.").
Applying these principles, courts have repeatedly reaffirmed that peaceful protest does not lose its protection merely because some isolated individuals act violently outside the protections of the First Amendment:
Moreover, although defendants make much of the fact that some
loes not lose all constitutional protection merely because som members of the group
may have participated in conduct o
advocated doctrine that itself is not protected."
Jones v. Parmley, 465 F.3d 46, 57 (2d Cir. 2006) (cleaned up) (quoting NAACP v.
Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886, 908 (1982)); see also Black Lives Matter Seattle-King Cnty. v. City of Seattle, 466 F. Supp. 3d 1206, 1213 (W.D. Wash. 2020) (finding that instances of protesters "launch[ing] objects at the police, ranging from rocks, bottles, fireworks, traffic cones, traffic flares, and more," warranted only "ensur[ing] an adequate police presence and "arrest[ing] those who engage in such conduct" rather than
"suppress[ing] legitimate First Amendment conduct as a prophylactic measure" (quoting Collins v. Jordan, 110 F.3d 1363, 1372 (9th Cir. 1996))); Index Newspapers LLC v. City of Portland, 480 F. Supp. 3d 1120, 1143 (D. Or. 2020) (*The fact that there are some violent offenders [] does not give the Federal Defendants carte blanche to attack journalists and legal observers and infringe their First Amendment rights."). In short, individuals' right to protest the government is …](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:wufsdxzvzx36d7wppganbvpw/bafkreifshx67oywmipgcy5cxths6aal6u5gaa3gb7q2epbmvbgvta5qnyy@jpeg)
![conduct and "rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States" is untenable and dangerous.
In a short paragraph, Defendants suggest that even if there was no rebellion that
would justify federalizing the National Guard, there was still a "danger of a rebellion," which would satisfy § 12406. Opp. at 16. This argument cannot withstand scrutiny. For starters, President Trump and Secretary Hegseth did not rely on a "danger of a rebellion"
when issuing the memorandum and orders that federalized the National Guard under s
12406. See June 7 Memo; June 7 Order; June 9 Order? It is concerning, to say the least, to imagine that the federal executive could unilaterally exercise military force in a domestic context and then be allowed to backfill justifications for doing so, especially considering how wary courts are of after-the-fact justifications even where the stakes are lower. Cf. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n of U.S. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 50 (1983) ("[CJourts may not accept appellate counsel's post hoc rationalizations for agency action."). But in any event, Defendants do not even explain how the Court should determine whether there is a "danger of a rebellion." "Rebellion" remains the operative word, and so any difference between a "rebellion" and a "danger of a rebellion" must be a difference of degree, not one of kind, with respect to the conduct of the alleged rebellion.
With that in mind, Defendants have still not established a factual basis-again, even assuming their factual assertions to be correct-from which this Court can conclude that there is a danger of an organized, violent, armed uprising with the goal of overthrowing the lawful government of the United States.
Accordingly, Defendants do not satisfy the "rebellion" condition.
c.
Execution of the Laws
The third condition justifying the federalization of the National Guard, and the second advanced by Defendants, is that "the President [was] unable with the regular fo…](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:wufsdxzvzx36d7wppganbvpw/bafkreid4wpeeg5kirabt4oyaelqbsxq327w2oag63lnitwoha3tehgzwwm@jpeg)
June 13, 2025 at 1:34 AM
Among many notable points: Judge Breyer concludes that to declare this a “rebellion,” as the administration would have it, would raise serious First Amendment concerns.
I’m proud of my senator, Alex Padilla. California is a diverse and complex state and is big in every way. It must be a challenge to lead. We have 40x the population of South Dakota yet we have the same number of senators trying to help Californians. We appreciate you, Senator.
June 12, 2025 at 8:57 PM
I’m proud of my senator, Alex Padilla. California is a diverse and complex state and is big in every way. It must be a challenge to lead. We have 40x the population of South Dakota yet we have the same number of senators trying to help Californians. We appreciate you, Senator.
We have now reached the part of our journey where Taco Trump changes his policy regarding immigrants, so social media is flooded with videos of “remorseful republicans.” This gives Taco Trump cover.
June 12, 2025 at 4:06 PM
We have now reached the part of our journey where Taco Trump changes his policy regarding immigrants, so social media is flooded with videos of “remorseful republicans.” This gives Taco Trump cover.
Jimmy Kimmel perfectly covers the Trumped up conflict in LA. Don’t talk about Epstein! Talk about this instead. Stay safe, Angelenos and bless you for protecting your own.
youtu.be/baR4logaaOQ?...
youtu.be/baR4logaaOQ?...
Jimmy Kimmel Tells the Truth About What’s REALLY Happening in LA
YouTube video by Jimmy Kimmel Live
youtu.be
June 11, 2025 at 3:36 PM
Jimmy Kimmel perfectly covers the Trumped up conflict in LA. Don’t talk about Epstein! Talk about this instead. Stay safe, Angelenos and bless you for protecting your own.
youtu.be/baR4logaaOQ?...
youtu.be/baR4logaaOQ?...
I just watched The Kingmaker documentary by Lauren Greenfield interviewing Imelda Marcos.
Trump is a young Imelda Marcos. (She’s 95)
“Perception is real and the truth is not.”
They believed the treasury was their money.
At age 92 she watched her son be inaugurated president.
Wow! Great film.
Trump is a young Imelda Marcos. (She’s 95)
“Perception is real and the truth is not.”
They believed the treasury was their money.
At age 92 she watched her son be inaugurated president.
Wow! Great film.
May 25, 2025 at 3:00 PM
I just watched The Kingmaker documentary by Lauren Greenfield interviewing Imelda Marcos.
Trump is a young Imelda Marcos. (She’s 95)
“Perception is real and the truth is not.”
They believed the treasury was their money.
At age 92 she watched her son be inaugurated president.
Wow! Great film.
Trump is a young Imelda Marcos. (She’s 95)
“Perception is real and the truth is not.”
They believed the treasury was their money.
At age 92 she watched her son be inaugurated president.
Wow! Great film.
Over 215,000 public comments were submitted at regulations.gov regarding gutting the endangered species act via redefining the word “harm.”
A big thank you to all Americans who submitted a comment!
A big thank you to all Americans who submitted a comment!
May 20, 2025 at 4:18 PM
Over 215,000 public comments were submitted at regulations.gov regarding gutting the endangered species act via redefining the word “harm.”
A big thank you to all Americans who submitted a comment!
A big thank you to all Americans who submitted a comment!
www.federalregister.gov/documents/20...
Today is the last full day to file a public comment opposing the weakening of the US Endangered Species Act.
Please take a few minutes to comment!
(It technically ends tomorrow, but what if the cutoff is 12:01 am or something weird like that?)
Today is the last full day to file a public comment opposing the weakening of the US Endangered Species Act.
Please take a few minutes to comment!
(It technically ends tomorrow, but what if the cutoff is 12:01 am or something weird like that?)
May 18, 2025 at 9:53 PM
www.federalregister.gov/documents/20...
Today is the last full day to file a public comment opposing the weakening of the US Endangered Species Act.
Please take a few minutes to comment!
(It technically ends tomorrow, but what if the cutoff is 12:01 am or something weird like that?)
Today is the last full day to file a public comment opposing the weakening of the US Endangered Species Act.
Please take a few minutes to comment!
(It technically ends tomorrow, but what if the cutoff is 12:01 am or something weird like that?)
If Trump’s “beautiful baby girls - that’s eleven years old” wants to collect American Girl dolls, he’s right that they won’t have many.
They’re $160. Double for tariffs: $320 each.
Federal minimum wage is $7.25.
After withholding, that’s about 50 hours of labor for one doll.
They’re $160. Double for tariffs: $320 each.
Federal minimum wage is $7.25.
After withholding, that’s about 50 hours of labor for one doll.
May 5, 2025 at 6:15 PM
If Trump’s “beautiful baby girls - that’s eleven years old” wants to collect American Girl dolls, he’s right that they won’t have many.
They’re $160. Double for tariffs: $320 each.
Federal minimum wage is $7.25.
After withholding, that’s about 50 hours of labor for one doll.
They’re $160. Double for tariffs: $320 each.
Federal minimum wage is $7.25.
After withholding, that’s about 50 hours of labor for one doll.
"I don't think that a beautiful baby girl needs – that's 11 years old – needs to have 30 dolls” said Trump.
As usual, he’ll get a pass on talking about beautiful baby eleven year olds.
As usual, he’ll get a pass on talking about beautiful baby eleven year olds.
May 5, 2025 at 5:24 PM
"I don't think that a beautiful baby girl needs – that's 11 years old – needs to have 30 dolls” said Trump.
As usual, he’ll get a pass on talking about beautiful baby eleven year olds.
As usual, he’ll get a pass on talking about beautiful baby eleven year olds.
Trump: “Well, maybe the children will have two dolls instead of 30 dolls, you know? And maybe the two dolls will cost a couple of bucks more than they would normally.”
Barbie newborn pups playset: $15.99
With 125% tariff: $35.98
Federal minimum wage: $7.25. Net: about $6.
Hours of labor: about 6.
Barbie newborn pups playset: $15.99
With 125% tariff: $35.98
Federal minimum wage: $7.25. Net: about $6.
Hours of labor: about 6.
May 2, 2025 at 1:07 PM
Trump: “Well, maybe the children will have two dolls instead of 30 dolls, you know? And maybe the two dolls will cost a couple of bucks more than they would normally.”
Barbie newborn pups playset: $15.99
With 125% tariff: $35.98
Federal minimum wage: $7.25. Net: about $6.
Hours of labor: about 6.
Barbie newborn pups playset: $15.99
With 125% tariff: $35.98
Federal minimum wage: $7.25. Net: about $6.
Hours of labor: about 6.
Nepo man-baby RFK Jr has never encountered an adult with “full blown autism” [sic] in his bubble life. Therefore they don’t exist. What a dumbass.
April 23, 2025 at 7:51 PM
Nepo man-baby RFK Jr has never encountered an adult with “full blown autism” [sic] in his bubble life. Therefore they don’t exist. What a dumbass.
Missing in the SF Bay Area: Amy Huang.
Check Reddit.com/r/bayarea for more info.
Check Reddit.com/r/bayarea for more info.
April 4, 2025 at 2:36 PM
Missing in the SF Bay Area: Amy Huang.
Check Reddit.com/r/bayarea for more info.
Check Reddit.com/r/bayarea for more info.
People work hard to get hired by the federal government and to follow all the many rules to keep & succeed at their jobs. Then some weirdo can crash around with no rules or restraints and fire people - making a mockery of any standards or policies in our govt. A sad spectacle.
February 15, 2025 at 5:17 AM
People work hard to get hired by the federal government and to follow all the many rules to keep & succeed at their jobs. Then some weirdo can crash around with no rules or restraints and fire people - making a mockery of any standards or policies in our govt. A sad spectacle.
Reposted by L Elizabeth
One of our supporters shared this with us—people are getting creative tonight!
February 14, 2025 at 4:25 AM
One of our supporters shared this with us—people are getting creative tonight!
Congratulations to the Super Bowl champs Philadelphia Eagles! The game was amazing!!
February 10, 2025 at 5:01 AM
Congratulations to the Super Bowl champs Philadelphia Eagles! The game was amazing!!
Government agencies subscribing to Politico Pro = Corruption.
Republicans and foreign governments booking events at Trump properties = Cool.
Catch and Kill = Who cares?
This will never make sense.
Republicans and foreign governments booking events at Trump properties = Cool.
Catch and Kill = Who cares?
This will never make sense.
February 7, 2025 at 4:31 PM
Government agencies subscribing to Politico Pro = Corruption.
Republicans and foreign governments booking events at Trump properties = Cool.
Catch and Kill = Who cares?
This will never make sense.
Republicans and foreign governments booking events at Trump properties = Cool.
Catch and Kill = Who cares?
This will never make sense.
So is Nestor the brother of Woman 1 (aka the girlfriend who sourced many of the other young women) in the Gaetz report?
December 25, 2024 at 10:31 PM
So is Nestor the brother of Woman 1 (aka the girlfriend who sourced many of the other young women) in the Gaetz report?
Just saw this on my calendar. Trump’s inauguration on MLK day? Sad™️
December 7, 2024 at 5:51 PM
Just saw this on my calendar. Trump’s inauguration on MLK day? Sad™️
Just deactivated and deleted Twitter. Time to figure out how to make the most out of Bluesky. Whew!
December 11, 2023 at 1:22 PM
Just deactivated and deleted Twitter. Time to figure out how to make the most out of Bluesky. Whew!