@leifbrown.bsky.social
I do care, but you've missed the forest for the trees. Those dense urban cities? They don't just show a consistent shift.
In Texas, they show clear signs that the shift was artificial and algorithmic.
I notice you do a lot of name-calling. It doesn't hurt me, and it doesn't help you look better.
In Texas, they show clear signs that the shift was artificial and algorithmic.
I notice you do a lot of name-calling. It doesn't hurt me, and it doesn't help you look better.
July 13, 2025 at 11:51 PM
I do care, but you've missed the forest for the trees. Those dense urban cities? They don't just show a consistent shift.
In Texas, they show clear signs that the shift was artificial and algorithmic.
I notice you do a lot of name-calling. It doesn't hurt me, and it doesn't help you look better.
In Texas, they show clear signs that the shift was artificial and algorithmic.
I notice you do a lot of name-calling. It doesn't hurt me, and it doesn't help you look better.
Harris's gender didn't make voters cast ballots in a straight line.
That required fraud.
That required fraud.
July 3, 2025 at 3:57 PM
Harris's gender didn't make voters cast ballots in a straight line.
That required fraud.
That required fraud.
And here's Travis:
July 1, 2025 at 9:11 AM
And here's Travis:
The Klimek chart for Houston looks obscene:
(Apologies for the axis labels. I was using free software for heat maps.)
(Apologies for the axis labels. I was using free software for heat maps.)
July 1, 2025 at 9:09 AM
The Klimek chart for Houston looks obscene:
(Apologies for the axis labels. I was using free software for heat maps.)
(Apologies for the axis labels. I was using free software for heat maps.)
I was investigating the structure of downballot dropoff rates, for instance checking that for President & Senate
(Trump - Cruz) roughly equaled (Allred - Harris)
This revealed Craddick didn't move like other Republicans.
Here's the same data charted with linear scaling, if that helps:
(Trump - Cruz) roughly equaled (Allred - Harris)
This revealed Craddick didn't move like other Republicans.
Here's the same data charted with linear scaling, if that helps:
July 1, 2025 at 8:30 AM
I was investigating the structure of downballot dropoff rates, for instance checking that for President & Senate
(Trump - Cruz) roughly equaled (Allred - Harris)
This revealed Craddick didn't move like other Republicans.
Here's the same data charted with linear scaling, if that helps:
(Trump - Cruz) roughly equaled (Allred - Harris)
This revealed Craddick didn't move like other Republicans.
Here's the same data charted with linear scaling, if that helps:
When you get around to the Texas 2024 data, look for this.
I'm having a hard time believing it occurred naturally or coincidentally.
I'm having a hard time believing it occurred naturally or coincidentally.
July 1, 2025 at 12:19 AM
When you get around to the Texas 2024 data, look for this.
I'm having a hard time believing it occurred naturally or coincidentally.
I'm having a hard time believing it occurred naturally or coincidentally.
This is a heat map of the percent of the vote that Trump got (up-down), compared to voter turnout (left-right), in Houston, Texas, November 5, 2024.
Usually, you would expect a big circular blob.
If it points up-and-right, that indicates ballot stuffing (adding votes for one candidate).
Usually, you would expect a big circular blob.
If it points up-and-right, that indicates ballot stuffing (adding votes for one candidate).
June 28, 2025 at 9:34 AM
This is a heat map of the percent of the vote that Trump got (up-down), compared to voter turnout (left-right), in Houston, Texas, November 5, 2024.
Usually, you would expect a big circular blob.
If it points up-and-right, that indicates ballot stuffing (adding votes for one candidate).
Usually, you would expect a big circular blob.
If it points up-and-right, that indicates ballot stuffing (adding votes for one candidate).
This is evidence of ballot stuffing.
June 28, 2025 at 9:18 AM
This is evidence of ballot stuffing.
Illiteracy doesn't make people vote in straight lines.
June 27, 2025 at 3:20 AM
Illiteracy doesn't make people vote in straight lines.
Collective amnesia and racism do not cause voters to vote in straight lines across precincts.
This is what it looks like when someone alters the data.
This is what it looks like when someone alters the data.
June 26, 2025 at 10:12 PM
Collective amnesia and racism do not cause voters to vote in straight lines across precincts.
This is what it looks like when someone alters the data.
This is what it looks like when someone alters the data.
The Electoral College and gerrymandering are both clearly abuses of the democratic ideal, but neither of those made the citizens of Texas cities coordinate across party lines with the precision the data show.
The election results were altered externally.
The election results were altered externally.
June 26, 2025 at 10:07 PM
The Electoral College and gerrymandering are both clearly abuses of the democratic ideal, but neither of those made the citizens of Texas cities coordinate across party lines with the precision the data show.
The election results were altered externally.
The election results were altered externally.
Gerrymandering doesn't make voter turnout a straight line.
June 26, 2025 at 9:41 PM
Gerrymandering doesn't make voter turnout a straight line.
Oh, then you're gonna *love* this.
They left fingerprints:
They left fingerprints:
June 26, 2025 at 2:43 PM
Oh, then you're gonna *love* this.
They left fingerprints:
They left fingerprints:
Texas is a blue state held hostage by the worst gerrymandering in the country, and documented voter suppression.
See attached chart from Houston, 2024. Up and right is what ballot stuffing looks like.
See attached chart from Houston, 2024. Up and right is what ballot stuffing looks like.
June 26, 2025 at 2:07 PM
Texas is a blue state held hostage by the worst gerrymandering in the country, and documented voter suppression.
See attached chart from Houston, 2024. Up and right is what ballot stuffing looks like.
See attached chart from Houston, 2024. Up and right is what ballot stuffing looks like.
In case we didn't know which side of history Google chose:
When the LA solidarity protests kicked off, I got a lot of recommended content about "Latino Gangbangers Committing Crimes in Our Neighborhoods".
Mamdani wins the NYC Mayoral Democrat primary, and now YouTube recommends me this:
When the LA solidarity protests kicked off, I got a lot of recommended content about "Latino Gangbangers Committing Crimes in Our Neighborhoods".
Mamdani wins the NYC Mayoral Democrat primary, and now YouTube recommends me this:
June 25, 2025 at 11:51 PM
In case we didn't know which side of history Google chose:
When the LA solidarity protests kicked off, I got a lot of recommended content about "Latino Gangbangers Committing Crimes in Our Neighborhoods".
Mamdani wins the NYC Mayoral Democrat primary, and now YouTube recommends me this:
When the LA solidarity protests kicked off, I got a lot of recommended content about "Latino Gangbangers Committing Crimes in Our Neighborhoods".
Mamdani wins the NYC Mayoral Democrat primary, and now YouTube recommends me this:
Misogyny doesn't make people vote in straight lines.
June 24, 2025 at 8:29 PM
Misogyny doesn't make people vote in straight lines.
Her support of genocide didn't make people vote in straight lines.
June 24, 2025 at 8:25 PM
Her support of genocide didn't make people vote in straight lines.
"Ballot Stuffing" means adding votes for your candidate. But when someone does that, they also make it look like more people turned out to vote.
If you make the right chart, it points up and right.
Here's Trump in Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, Austin (who published easy, clean data):
If you make the right chart, it points up and right.
Here's Trump in Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, Austin (who published easy, clean data):
June 24, 2025 at 5:29 PM
"Ballot Stuffing" means adding votes for your candidate. But when someone does that, they also make it look like more people turned out to vote.
If you make the right chart, it points up and right.
Here's Trump in Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, Austin (who published easy, clean data):
If you make the right chart, it points up and right.
Here's Trump in Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, Austin (who published easy, clean data):
Racism and misogyny don't make people coordinate their votes across precincts, to draw straight lines.
June 24, 2025 at 1:18 PM
Racism and misogyny don't make people coordinate their votes across precincts, to draw straight lines.
Her failure to campaign in "flyover country" didn't cause Texas voters to coordinate their votes across party lines, in every major city in Texas.
This is an artifact of outside intervention:
This is an artifact of outside intervention:
June 24, 2025 at 1:10 PM
Her failure to campaign in "flyover country" didn't cause Texas voters to coordinate their votes across party lines, in every major city in Texas.
This is an artifact of outside intervention:
This is an artifact of outside intervention:
People watching Fox "News" didn't make voters coordinate their votes across party lines in every city in Texas.
That requires outside interference.
That requires outside interference.
June 24, 2025 at 12:47 PM
People watching Fox "News" didn't make voters coordinate their votes across party lines in every city in Texas.
That requires outside interference.
That requires outside interference.
I wouldn't rule that out, either.
But that doesn't explain the tabulator behavior in Clark County, NV.
And it doesn't explain why this happened in Texas. If I were *looking* for possible evidence of election fraud, these would count:
But that doesn't explain the tabulator behavior in Clark County, NV.
And it doesn't explain why this happened in Texas. If I were *looking* for possible evidence of election fraud, these would count:
June 22, 2025 at 9:10 PM
I wouldn't rule that out, either.
But that doesn't explain the tabulator behavior in Clark County, NV.
And it doesn't explain why this happened in Texas. If I were *looking* for possible evidence of election fraud, these would count:
But that doesn't explain the tabulator behavior in Clark County, NV.
And it doesn't explain why this happened in Texas. If I were *looking* for possible evidence of election fraud, these would count:
I'm an election count skeptic. I don't think this could have happened without close and public coordination across party lines, or else someone interfered with the count:
June 22, 2025 at 8:40 PM
I'm an election count skeptic. I don't think this could have happened without close and public coordination across party lines, or else someone interfered with the count:
Failure to attract independents didn't make people coordinate their votes across parties in Texas.
The excuses about independents, Gaza, racism and genocide are rationalizations.
This is what it looks like when an algorithm rewrites peoples' votes across counties.
The excuses about independents, Gaza, racism and genocide are rationalizations.
This is what it looks like when an algorithm rewrites peoples' votes across counties.
June 22, 2025 at 4:28 PM
Failure to attract independents didn't make people coordinate their votes across parties in Texas.
The excuses about independents, Gaza, racism and genocide are rationalizations.
This is what it looks like when an algorithm rewrites peoples' votes across counties.
The excuses about independents, Gaza, racism and genocide are rationalizations.
This is what it looks like when an algorithm rewrites peoples' votes across counties.