Leenie909 (Lady Quayfu) 🎧💙🧠🦉
LightNews LightNews
banner
leenie909.bsky.social
Leenie909 (Lady Quayfu) 🎧💙🧠🦉
@leenie909.bsky.social
2.1K followers 1.3K following 1.7K posts
She/her. NYC->NoVA. Wife, mom, GenXer. Jewish Universalist. Lifelong liberal activist. Music nerd. #musicsky #AT40. Pediatric neuropsychologist. #Neurodiversity & #MentalHealth advocate.

*This BlueSky account surrounds hate and forces it to surrender.*
Posts Replies Media Videos
leenie909.bsky.social
One of my favorite songs ever. Thx for posting!
June 28, 2025 at 2:00 PM
leenie909.bsky.social
OMG inorite? Such a laugh riot!!! #FuckAllTheWayOff
May 29, 2025 at 2:30 PM
leenie909.bsky.social
Literally in my top five of the funniest things I’ve ever seen in a movie.

Madeline Kahn: May her name be for a blessing.
April 17, 2025 at 1:42 PM
Reposted by Leenie909 (Lady Quayfu) 🎧💙🧠🦉
joshuajfriedman.com
"The Defendants' act of sending Abrego Garcia to El Salvador was wholly illegal from the moment it happened, and Defendants have been on notice of the same. ... [The] suggestion that they need time to meaningfully review a four-page Order that reaffirms this basic principle blinks at reality."
First, the Defendants' act of sending Abrego Garcia to El Salvador was wholly illegal from the moment it happened, and Defendants have been on notice of the same. Indeed, as the Supreme Court credits, "the United States acknowledges that Abrego Garcia was subject to a withholding order forbidding his removal to El Salvador, and that the removal to El Salvador was therefore illegal." Noem v. Abrego Garcia, 604 U.S. _ (2025), Slip Op. at 1. Second, the Defendants' suggestion that they need time to meaningfully review a four-page Order that reaffirms this basic principle blinks at reality. Third, the Defendants misconstrue the Supreme Court's Order stating that the original deadline at ECF No. 21 is "no longer effective," as somehow suggesting that the Court's amended Order requiring prompt attention to this matter is "inconsistent" with the Supreme Court's directive. Nothing could be further from the truth. As the Supreme Court plainly stated, "the Government should be prepared to share what it can concerning the steps it has taken and the prospect of further steps," Slip Op. at 2- all against the backdrop of this Court's needing to "ensure that the Government lives up to its obligations to follow the law." Id. at 4 (Sotomayor, J., concurring).
April 11, 2025 at 2:48 PM
leenie909.bsky.social
I was about to respond, “Hey! Me too!” Then I realized “oh, that’s my husband!”
April 11, 2025 at 12:40 PM
leenie909.bsky.social
Have fun with that. 🙄
April 11, 2025 at 12:33 PM