Lee Boone
@leeboone.com
Nerdy stuff. Web developer. Heterodox left.
is this a real thing or are you gail-lighting Bluesky?
December 7, 2024 at 6:16 PM
is this a real thing or are you gail-lighting Bluesky?
honestly, I’d rather deal with vitriol from the right than all the leftist infighting and purity testing. (maybe that’s what you’re talking about)
November 19, 2024 at 4:21 PM
honestly, I’d rather deal with vitriol from the right than all the leftist infighting and purity testing. (maybe that’s what you’re talking about)
it doesn’t count because he’s rich. duh. 😒
October 26, 2024 at 3:46 PM
it doesn’t count because he’s rich. duh. 😒
I don’t know that it guarantees that, but is certainly encourages and incentivizes it.
May 21, 2024 at 11:59 PM
I don’t know that it guarantees that, but is certainly encourages and incentivizes it.
The surveys aren’t out yet, are they? I’m champing at the bit to fill out my survey 🤪
April 25, 2024 at 10:25 AM
The surveys aren’t out yet, are they? I’m champing at the bit to fill out my survey 🤪
Just wanted to get a head start on the whole not giving a fuck.
March 19, 2024 at 3:38 PM
Just wanted to get a head start on the whole not giving a fuck.
Oh no. We might get dragged by strangers. *gasp* Whatever will we do?
March 19, 2024 at 3:34 PM
Oh no. We might get dragged by strangers. *gasp* Whatever will we do?
What part of 'refuse' don't you understand🤪
March 2, 2024 at 10:37 PM
What part of 'refuse' don't you understand🤪
I refuse to believe chasteberry is a thing.
February 29, 2024 at 12:37 AM
I refuse to believe chasteberry is a thing.
I don’t know how you knew I needed to see this right now, but thank you nonetheless.
February 19, 2024 at 8:04 PM
I don’t know how you knew I needed to see this right now, but thank you nonetheless.
so you block somebody just for mentioning the name of a popular podcast? that seems a little unhinged.
February 19, 2024 at 7:54 PM
so you block somebody just for mentioning the name of a popular podcast? that seems a little unhinged.
that’s definitely true over the course of the original run.
the ‘gag’ is my reading of X-Men #3 pp. 4-5 and I believe you about it having as more to do with Stan wanting to fill the space than real character development. thanks.
the ‘gag’ is my reading of X-Men #3 pp. 4-5 and I believe you about it having as more to do with Stan wanting to fill the space than real character development. thanks.
February 17, 2024 at 1:00 PM
that’s definitely true over the course of the original run.
the ‘gag’ is my reading of X-Men #3 pp. 4-5 and I believe you about it having as more to do with Stan wanting to fill the space than real character development. thanks.
the ‘gag’ is my reading of X-Men #3 pp. 4-5 and I believe you about it having as more to do with Stan wanting to fill the space than real character development. thanks.
Iceman is established as sixteen and a couple years younger than the others. The O-5 have been de-aged a bit in more recent stories set in this era
February 17, 2024 at 12:40 PM
Iceman is established as sixteen and a couple years younger than the others. The O-5 have been de-aged a bit in more recent stories set in this era
Stan is clearly working an ‘everyone is in love with Jean’ gag that was immediately dropped an everyone was content to forget about for ~30 years before it was picked back up and canonized as ‘creeping’ in the 90s
February 17, 2024 at 12:22 PM
Stan is clearly working an ‘everyone is in love with Jean’ gag that was immediately dropped an everyone was content to forget about for ~30 years before it was picked back up and canonized as ‘creeping’ in the 90s
that makes sense actually. I’ll pass it along. cheers 🥂
February 10, 2024 at 4:11 AM
that makes sense actually. I’ll pass it along. cheers 🥂
how, hypothetically, does one get to be a dear pervy friend?
asking for a friend, of course.
asking for a friend, of course.
February 10, 2024 at 4:06 AM
how, hypothetically, does one get to be a dear pervy friend?
asking for a friend, of course.
asking for a friend, of course.