The Senator who wanted troops used against Domestic protesters doesn’t seem like a go to guy on the legal uses of deadly force

It’s a virtuous cycle. Don’t do anything to offend the wealthy donors so they keep providing the donations that go towards making these consultants rich.

I think the price of this endorsement was the pledge to retain the police commissioner.

I don’t think that “brown liquid “ is glory.

To be fair these people don’t consider reform congregations Jewish reformjudaism.org/blog/next-ye...

Dan, don’t be such a round earther.

You know what was different? the thousands of dollars that COVID relief and the expanded CTC were putting into the pockets of millions of low and moderate income families went away. High prices hit a lot harder when your disposable income falls by 5-7%.

NYT: A majority of Americans support segregation so it’s wrong for Rosa Parks to resist it.

But @nytimesoped.bsky.social told me that Democrats were the ones out of step on crime?

Leaky Pete?

My corner before

My corner

The 70’s a noted time of racial harmony.

Why do these analyses never consider the possibility that choices the Democrats made cost them votes? For example If voters from immigrant communities switched to Trump, could it be that embracing the Republican immigration agenda neutralized Trumps weakness with Latinos and Asians?

If he broke the law? Has he been charged with anything? You don’t detain and imprison someone and then decide if they broke the law but you know for Chuck due process isn’t for Palestinians.

I take your point but the bottom line is the strategy wasn’t successful, given a choice , swing voters didn’t respond to Clinton’s centrism and his 43% was appreciably worse than Dukakis 45.6%

First let’s dispense with the myth that the Clinton/Carville strategy was some kind of genius. Clinton got 43% of the popular vote far less than Harris and one of the worst showings by the winner in U.S. history. His centrism didn’t gain him the so-called middle, he simply benefited from Perot

Should’ve added a P.S. Though I doubt our students would be interested in working for a U.S. Attorney so obviously ignorant of the law and the Constitution.