@laybros.bsky.social
IU ‘19 / ND ‘22
fmr. big fed / now private
Securities, Fin Reg, Hoosier Sports
fmr. big fed / now private
Securities, Fin Reg, Hoosier Sports
There was an interesting—if unresolved—application of this during the 2020 grand jury shutdown. Does an unconsented information (e.g. no GJ) properly institute proceedings sufficient to trigger the savings clause? Or because the information was a nullity does it not count? From the saga of Dr. Gatz
www.govinfo.gov
December 2, 2025 at 4:01 PM
There was an interesting—if unresolved—application of this during the 2020 grand jury shutdown. Does an unconsented information (e.g. no GJ) properly institute proceedings sufficient to trigger the savings clause? Or because the information was a nullity does it not count? From the saga of Dr. Gatz
FYI it appears this case was not on the oral argument calendar. As a matter of routine, non argument cases are not published and are (except in unusual cases) per curiam in the Eleventh Circuit.
(Unless practice has dramatically changed in the last couple years)
(Unless practice has dramatically changed in the last couple years)
November 18, 2025 at 5:14 PM
FYI it appears this case was not on the oral argument calendar. As a matter of routine, non argument cases are not published and are (except in unusual cases) per curiam in the Eleventh Circuit.
(Unless practice has dramatically changed in the last couple years)
(Unless practice has dramatically changed in the last couple years)
Reposted
Same group? Is that a pistol being pointed at the guy in blue?
October 12, 2025 at 6:18 PM
Same group? Is that a pistol being pointed at the guy in blue?
Reposted
Ultimately this the biggest thing giving the lie to the Supreme Ciut’s originality methodology
If your preferred interpretive method relies on identifying the original meaning of the text—and your application of that method produces Stuartism—it must be wrong! Almost definitionally
If your preferred interpretive method relies on identifying the original meaning of the text—and your application of that method produces Stuartism—it must be wrong! Almost definitionally
October 8, 2025 at 12:18 AM
Ultimately this the biggest thing giving the lie to the Supreme Ciut’s originality methodology
If your preferred interpretive method relies on identifying the original meaning of the text—and your application of that method produces Stuartism—it must be wrong! Almost definitionally
If your preferred interpretive method relies on identifying the original meaning of the text—and your application of that method produces Stuartism—it must be wrong! Almost definitionally
Ultimately this the biggest thing giving the lie to the Supreme Ciut’s originality methodology
If your preferred interpretive method relies on identifying the original meaning of the text—and your application of that method produces Stuartism—it must be wrong! Almost definitionally
If your preferred interpretive method relies on identifying the original meaning of the text—and your application of that method produces Stuartism—it must be wrong! Almost definitionally
October 8, 2025 at 12:18 AM
Ultimately this the biggest thing giving the lie to the Supreme Ciut’s originality methodology
If your preferred interpretive method relies on identifying the original meaning of the text—and your application of that method produces Stuartism—it must be wrong! Almost definitionally
If your preferred interpretive method relies on identifying the original meaning of the text—and your application of that method produces Stuartism—it must be wrong! Almost definitionally
The rule is here: www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp...
Rule 6. The Grand Jury
www.law.cornell.edu
September 26, 2025 at 1:12 AM
The rule is here: www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp...
A federal grand jury has between 16-23 jurors.
September 26, 2025 at 1:08 AM
A federal grand jury has between 16-23 jurors.