@lawyche.bsky.social
What a wonderful, enlightening conversation! Dr. DeGruy is 🔥!
March 12, 2025 at 10:00 PM
What a wonderful, enlightening conversation! Dr. DeGruy is 🔥!
Great interview! I really didn't know much about Spill, but I will definitely check it out now!
March 12, 2025 at 9:38 PM
Great interview! I really didn't know much about Spill, but I will definitely check it out now!
Are you from Boston? 😆
March 5, 2025 at 3:50 PM
Are you from Boston? 😆
Loving the tracksuit! 😁#truthteller #weneedjoy
February 25, 2025 at 12:25 AM
Loving the tracksuit! 😁#truthteller #weneedjoy
Thank you @libradunn1.bsky.social for all of the things you do! Stay safe!
February 10, 2025 at 5:34 PM
Thank you @libradunn1.bsky.social for all of the things you do! Stay safe!
Yeah, @claycane.bsky.social this Mo guy sounds hysterical... 🙄Can't cosign with his point of view. But yeah, peace.
February 6, 2025 at 7:57 PM
Yeah, @claycane.bsky.social this Mo guy sounds hysterical... 🙄Can't cosign with his point of view. But yeah, peace.
(5/5) How about the Dems and allies create a coordinated approach to broadcasting your strong opposition across multiple channels (not just through fundraising emails or appearances on MSM) to activate the negative public opinion already out here and maybe even pick up some new supporters?
February 3, 2025 at 2:20 AM
(5/5) How about the Dems and allies create a coordinated approach to broadcasting your strong opposition across multiple channels (not just through fundraising emails or appearances on MSM) to activate the negative public opinion already out here and maybe even pick up some new supporters?
(4/5) ... its opposition helped fuel the legal challenges that led to the Supreme Court striking it down.
This case remains a major example of checks and balances in action.
This case remains a major example of checks and balances in action.
February 3, 2025 at 2:20 AM
(4/5) ... its opposition helped fuel the legal challenges that led to the Supreme Court striking it down.
This case remains a major example of checks and balances in action.
This case remains a major example of checks and balances in action.
(3/5)The steel companies sued and the Supreme Court ended up ruling that the president’s order was unconstitutional because he lacked congressional authorization.
The Court’s ruling forced Truman to return control of the mills.
Even though Congress didn’t pass a law to overturn the EO...
The Court’s ruling forced Truman to return control of the mills.
Even though Congress didn’t pass a law to overturn the EO...
February 3, 2025 at 2:20 AM
(3/5)The steel companies sued and the Supreme Court ended up ruling that the president’s order was unconstitutional because he lacked congressional authorization.
The Court’s ruling forced Truman to return control of the mills.
Even though Congress didn’t pass a law to overturn the EO...
The Court’s ruling forced Truman to return control of the mills.
Even though Congress didn’t pass a law to overturn the EO...
(2/5) Many lawmakers, including members of Truman’s own party, saw it as an overreach of executive power.
Congress did not pass specific legislation to override it, but members voiced strong opposition, weakening public support.
Congress did not pass specific legislation to override it, but members voiced strong opposition, weakening public support.
February 3, 2025 at 2:20 AM
(2/5) Many lawmakers, including members of Truman’s own party, saw it as an overreach of executive power.
Congress did not pass specific legislation to override it, but members voiced strong opposition, weakening public support.
Congress did not pass specific legislation to override it, but members voiced strong opposition, weakening public support.
(1/5) Hi Senator Warren. I asked an AI "what can congress do about a president issuing illegal executive orders?" Here is one answer:
In April, 1952: Pres. Truman bypassed Congress to issue an EO seizing control of steel mills to prevent a strike he thought would harm the Korean war effort.
In April, 1952: Pres. Truman bypassed Congress to issue an EO seizing control of steel mills to prevent a strike he thought would harm the Korean war effort.
February 3, 2025 at 2:20 AM
(1/5) Hi Senator Warren. I asked an AI "what can congress do about a president issuing illegal executive orders?" Here is one answer:
In April, 1952: Pres. Truman bypassed Congress to issue an EO seizing control of steel mills to prevent a strike he thought would harm the Korean war effort.
In April, 1952: Pres. Truman bypassed Congress to issue an EO seizing control of steel mills to prevent a strike he thought would harm the Korean war effort.
Not enough ❤️❤️❤️s for this!
February 1, 2025 at 3:27 PM
Not enough ❤️❤️❤️s for this!
Thank you, Brenda! I was going to say the same thing. I am very surprised that @tribelaw.bsky.social worded his response that way.
January 31, 2025 at 4:56 PM
Thank you, Brenda! I was going to say the same thing. I am very surprised that @tribelaw.bsky.social worded his response that way.
So fashionable... 😁
January 30, 2025 at 7:24 PM
So fashionable... 😁
THANK YOU for sharing this @luriedanielfavors.bsky.social! The guide has practical actions we all can take to push back on Project 2025. I felt so much better after reading it, and I found my local group! I literally exhaled! 😅
January 29, 2025 at 10:03 PM
THANK YOU for sharing this @luriedanielfavors.bsky.social! The guide has practical actions we all can take to push back on Project 2025. I felt so much better after reading it, and I found my local group! I literally exhaled! 😅
