Lawbster.bakes
@lawbster-bakes.bsky.social
Please don’t follow if we don’t actually know one another. Views expressed, shared, or otherwise made known are my own and do not reflect any past or present employer.
Well that’s not true, the entire bevy of recent appointees clearly should be fired for gross incompetence and threatening national security.
February 18, 2025 at 5:02 AM
Well that’s not true, the entire bevy of recent appointees clearly should be fired for gross incompetence and threatening national security.
Even the saudis can only buy so many bulk orders of those ugly hats
February 14, 2025 at 11:14 PM
Even the saudis can only buy so many bulk orders of those ugly hats
With a name like that she’ll never carry that district.
February 14, 2025 at 1:42 AM
With a name like that she’ll never carry that district.
Fires half the FBI, rehired an incel racist.
February 7, 2025 at 9:20 PM
Fires half the FBI, rehired an incel racist.
Well there’s probably something in Revelations about the antichrist seizing the land of (biblical) Israel, so right on track for the apocalypse.
February 5, 2025 at 12:51 AM
Well there’s probably something in Revelations about the antichrist seizing the land of (biblical) Israel, so right on track for the apocalypse.
You’re talking about a “citizen’s arrest,” which are almost never upheld
February 4, 2025 at 12:02 AM
You’re talking about a “citizen’s arrest,” which are almost never upheld
Well, he doesn’t have that authority actually. Senators and representatives aren’t magistrates.
February 3, 2025 at 8:55 PM
Well, he doesn’t have that authority actually. Senators and representatives aren’t magistrates.
This EO also extends the ban to include people aged 18 by defining “child” as “anyone under 19 years of age,” which is contrary to law.
January 29, 2025 at 3:18 AM
This EO also extends the ban to include people aged 18 by defining “child” as “anyone under 19 years of age,” which is contrary to law.
Thanks Manchin & Sinema
January 28, 2025 at 10:14 PM
Thanks Manchin & Sinema
Petro *did* win that. Trump backed down like the coward he is and the media is instead covering it like Trump won.
January 28, 2025 at 2:09 PM
Petro *did* win that. Trump backed down like the coward he is and the media is instead covering it like Trump won.
You won’t get him to answer any serious questions seriously, so instead maybe ask him how he felt when all the king’s horses and all the king’s men couldn’t put his cousin back together again.
January 28, 2025 at 2:03 AM
You won’t get him to answer any serious questions seriously, so instead maybe ask him how he felt when all the king’s horses and all the king’s men couldn’t put his cousin back together again.
When the fall is all that’s left
January 28, 2025 at 12:51 AM
When the fall is all that’s left
“Mexicans, long sympathetic to migrants” is an interesting editorial.
January 26, 2025 at 5:39 PM
“Mexicans, long sympathetic to migrants” is an interesting editorial.
My understanding was that their claim is that they’re descended from vestiges of at least three different tribal groups that banded together in the 1700s due to dwindling numbers.
Either way, I wouldn’t be whatsoever shocked if they wind up building a casino and name it after Trump.
Either way, I wouldn’t be whatsoever shocked if they wind up building a casino and name it after Trump.
January 25, 2025 at 7:45 PM
My understanding was that their claim is that they’re descended from vestiges of at least three different tribal groups that banded together in the 1700s due to dwindling numbers.
Either way, I wouldn’t be whatsoever shocked if they wind up building a casino and name it after Trump.
Either way, I wouldn’t be whatsoever shocked if they wind up building a casino and name it after Trump.
That’s probably true of a not-insignificant number of east coast tribes though
January 25, 2025 at 7:00 PM
That’s probably true of a not-insignificant number of east coast tribes though
FWIW, this was also the case in DeVos’s confirmation back in 2017 - but that not being sued over set precedent.
January 25, 2025 at 4:19 AM
FWIW, this was also the case in DeVos’s confirmation back in 2017 - but that not being sued over set precedent.
It’s legally questionable whether the VP can actually cast a vote in a nomination process. On *legislation* they’re constitutionally required to, but nominations aren’t legislation.
January 25, 2025 at 4:11 AM
It’s legally questionable whether the VP can actually cast a vote in a nomination process. On *legislation* they’re constitutionally required to, but nominations aren’t legislation.
It would make Mexican asylum cases more viable.
January 24, 2025 at 8:59 PM
It would make Mexican asylum cases more viable.
You could say that about half the republican conference
January 24, 2025 at 12:51 AM
You could say that about half the republican conference
It isn’t, technically. Immigration proceedings are not criminal trials - they’re civil administrative proceedings. You don’t have a right to counsel in that setting. The pretty conservative immigration bill Trump spiked last year would have changed that.
January 24, 2025 at 12:50 AM
It isn’t, technically. Immigration proceedings are not criminal trials - they’re civil administrative proceedings. You don’t have a right to counsel in that setting. The pretty conservative immigration bill Trump spiked last year would have changed that.