yikes. I was going to laugh but... I can't.

thank you for writing this. Wow!

meant to say, Dr Joan and Dr John Smith

but why isn't her first name included, too. Dr and Dr John Smith should be Dr Joan and John Smith. Sometimes the "correct" way is the old, outdated way...

I liked the chapter which talks about how juries, lawyers, judges evaluate victim/survivors' credibility and the factors they use to decide how believable a survivor's story is, like whether the victim/survivor knew the prep or not. It speaks to the systemic nature of rape culture.

the first chapter was thick, hard to decipher the language. Yes, too academic, and I almost quit. But the following chapters have been more engaging. As they review all these high profile cases, like Cosby and Weinstein and show how the media portrays them. It's insightful...

companies don't have spines. They have shareholders.

by shutting down protest, they shut down free speech.

It's a dumb bill and won't do anything to stop hate crimes. Criminalizing the use of certain symbols like the swastika is a gift to law enforcement to harass and shut down anyone they disagree with. www.cbc.ca/news/politic...

but will he eat green eggs and ham?

it wasn't me. Was it you, Jack? No, no, wasn't me either. I think it might have been the cat.

with thanks to Rob Breakenridge: calgaryherald.com/opinion/colu...