But unlike system shock, we’re not keeping this tech in isolated computers that are disconnected from the internet. Which kinda sucks.
Hey though, I guess we could probably do more on offline computers without all the safety and security blocks to access machine code! Namely assembly, cause binary L

-r of the AI would be at fault, NOT the AI itself. Having said that though, I’m sure there’d be fail safes. Fail safes that I’m sure, can and will be walked around. Much like in the case of system shock.

Further alleged, is that Elon Musk believes, if HE is the one who creates said dictator and vowed loyalty to it, then he will be safe.
I counter this idea with an idea of my own; The AI could just, ?misinterpret? any act of free will beyond what it is coded to allow, as disobedience. And the creato-

Good for y’all! Odysee(the YouTube clone) has had a harder time reaching this goal I think. Definitely reckon a part of this is the fact that they don’t have y’all’s philosophy on UI and app design, as their current philosophy, does not bend in their favour.

So meta still has the power to misinform... Boy, if only they DIDN'T police their own content, then the government could've ACTUALLY done its checks and balances on meta!

- If I'm reading what you're saying correctly, that is.

-well, just take a look at the post I have attached, cause I lack certain grammar skills;

I take it slop content is what you're alluding to(if not, good guess?)? Especially since all slop content is, like hitting the text-limit, people stretching out & squeezing as much content out of a topic as possible with no real long term benefit to anyone after the first 1-3-? posts, other than $$$