☭☭NO WAR BUT CLASS WAR☭☭
@lainiwakurathought.bsky.social
bolshevist, genderfluid, anti-fascist, jesus of suburbia, "genuinely malicious": number one yakov sverdlov stan 1908
"Be strong in the belief that life is wonderful. Be positive and believe that the Revolution will always win." - V. Sablin
"Be strong in the belief that life is wonderful. Be positive and believe that the Revolution will always win." - V. Sablin
>liberals elect bernie and AOC in 2028
>nothing changes
>slightly more racist liberals elect the corpse of howard hughes in 2032
>nothing changes
liberalism at its finest
>nothing changes
>slightly more racist liberals elect the corpse of howard hughes in 2032
>nothing changes
liberalism at its finest
April 13, 2025 at 3:05 AM
>liberals elect bernie and AOC in 2028
>nothing changes
>slightly more racist liberals elect the corpse of howard hughes in 2032
>nothing changes
liberalism at its finest
>nothing changes
>slightly more racist liberals elect the corpse of howard hughes in 2032
>nothing changes
liberalism at its finest
kamala's campaign ran on continuing biden's presidency and going a little rightward on immigration while trump's campaign ran on "i will personally stab biden in the chest" and the majority of american voters wanted to stab biden in the chest.
if you want to blame anybody, blame the democrats
if you want to blame anybody, blame the democrats
April 13, 2025 at 3:04 AM
kamala's campaign ran on continuing biden's presidency and going a little rightward on immigration while trump's campaign ran on "i will personally stab biden in the chest" and the majority of american voters wanted to stab biden in the chest.
if you want to blame anybody, blame the democrats
if you want to blame anybody, blame the democrats
because kamala ran a dogshit campaign and trump offered solutions. stupid solutions that make absolutely no sense to people who care about them, but it sounded like he offered a way out from biden's presidency, which is what the people who voted for him wanted: biden sucked and they didn't want more
April 13, 2025 at 3:03 AM
because kamala ran a dogshit campaign and trump offered solutions. stupid solutions that make absolutely no sense to people who care about them, but it sounded like he offered a way out from biden's presidency, which is what the people who voted for him wanted: biden sucked and they didn't want more
when we see corporates in general
April 13, 2025 at 3:01 AM
when we see corporates in general
your question is fucking stupid and it would be answered by looking at my username lmao
let me rephrase then. the democratic party completely failed to provide any policies that showed a meaningful break from the very unpopular biden. kamala lost when she said nothing would change
let me rephrase then. the democratic party completely failed to provide any policies that showed a meaningful break from the very unpopular biden. kamala lost when she said nothing would change
March 8, 2025 at 1:25 AM
your question is fucking stupid and it would be answered by looking at my username lmao
let me rephrase then. the democratic party completely failed to provide any policies that showed a meaningful break from the very unpopular biden. kamala lost when she said nothing would change
let me rephrase then. the democratic party completely failed to provide any policies that showed a meaningful break from the very unpopular biden. kamala lost when she said nothing would change
much like the USSR in the 40s, it has taken socialist aesthetics and used them to cover up a bureaucratic, imperialist engine! the proletariat in china is fundamentally divorced from the political process. it is a liberal bureaucratic dictatorship much like japan. total xi jinping death!
March 7, 2025 at 7:26 PM
much like the USSR in the 40s, it has taken socialist aesthetics and used them to cover up a bureaucratic, imperialist engine! the proletariat in china is fundamentally divorced from the political process. it is a liberal bureaucratic dictatorship much like japan. total xi jinping death!
the proletariat in china is forced to work for pennies in appalling conditions: the largest economic contributors to china's economy are multi-billion dollar corporations. it is a capitalist comprador state, in the same vein as russia or the united states
March 7, 2025 at 7:25 PM
the proletariat in china is forced to work for pennies in appalling conditions: the largest economic contributors to china's economy are multi-billion dollar corporations. it is a capitalist comprador state, in the same vein as russia or the united states
the products of the proletariat's labor was returned? that's fuckin hilarious dude. the CPC is actively allying with multi-billionaires, upholds the fascist DPRK, and has an active comprador class siphoning minerals and economic output from african countries.
March 7, 2025 at 7:24 PM
the products of the proletariat's labor was returned? that's fuckin hilarious dude. the CPC is actively allying with multi-billionaires, upholds the fascist DPRK, and has an active comprador class siphoning minerals and economic output from african countries.
then why didn't they liberate the proletariat
March 7, 2025 at 6:41 PM
then why didn't they liberate the proletariat
then maybe the CPC should've developed and fostered the revolutionary chinese proletariat instead of sending in the army to crush it and firmly allying itself with the peasantry and the developing bourgeoisie
March 7, 2025 at 6:30 PM
then maybe the CPC should've developed and fostered the revolutionary chinese proletariat instead of sending in the army to crush it and firmly allying itself with the peasantry and the developing bourgeoisie
modern khrushchevites aren't ready to admit it but hua guofeng and deng xiaoping were the most logical successors to mao zedong
March 7, 2025 at 6:14 PM
modern khrushchevites aren't ready to admit it but hua guofeng and deng xiaoping were the most logical successors to mao zedong
the chinese revolution may have had a proletariat sector of its makeup but the proletariat was firmly betrayed by the CPC in 1967 when mao sicked the PLA on the shanghai commune; and even before that china was not a proletarian dictatorship, it was a broader khrushchevian class collaborationist one
March 7, 2025 at 6:09 PM
the chinese revolution may have had a proletariat sector of its makeup but the proletariat was firmly betrayed by the CPC in 1967 when mao sicked the PLA on the shanghai commune; and even before that china was not a proletarian dictatorship, it was a broader khrushchevian class collaborationist one
it's really no different from the USSR in the late 40s. it can claim to be led by a communist party all it wants, but the fact of the matter is the chinese revolution at its core was based off of the peasantry and petite bourgeoisie than the proletariat: as proven in 1967!
March 7, 2025 at 6:08 PM
it's really no different from the USSR in the late 40s. it can claim to be led by a communist party all it wants, but the fact of the matter is the chinese revolution at its core was based off of the peasantry and petite bourgeoisie than the proletariat: as proven in 1967!
i'm genuinely completely unsure how you somehow got that conclusion
"the democratic party should make it seem like they have ideas" > "SO YOU LIKE TRUMP"
average liberal mental gymnastics!
"the democratic party should make it seem like they have ideas" > "SO YOU LIKE TRUMP"
average liberal mental gymnastics!
March 7, 2025 at 6:07 PM
i'm genuinely completely unsure how you somehow got that conclusion
"the democratic party should make it seem like they have ideas" > "SO YOU LIKE TRUMP"
average liberal mental gymnastics!
"the democratic party should make it seem like they have ideas" > "SO YOU LIKE TRUMP"
average liberal mental gymnastics!
one policy the democratic party needs to do is treating black and brown people like actual humans instead of vote farms. they are not going to do this of course and instead argue for "working with" trump while painting over BLM murals and being police apologists
March 7, 2025 at 2:52 PM
one policy the democratic party needs to do is treating black and brown people like actual humans instead of vote farms. they are not going to do this of course and instead argue for "working with" trump while painting over BLM murals and being police apologists
i mean the chinese economy is a capitalist economy so idk what you really expect them to do? china's been a bourgeois-capitalist state since the 60s and a comprador capitalist empire since the early aughts. if the american economy goes down the shitter (which it is) the china will be hurt too
March 7, 2025 at 2:50 PM
i mean the chinese economy is a capitalist economy so idk what you really expect them to do? china's been a bourgeois-capitalist state since the 60s and a comprador capitalist empire since the early aughts. if the american economy goes down the shitter (which it is) the china will be hurt too
every single strategy that might've won them the election (like pointing out how weird the republican party was) was stopped immediately for some reason. they ran a campaign of vibes instead of policy when policy was what the american people wanted, and they got shit on for it
March 7, 2025 at 2:47 PM
every single strategy that might've won them the election (like pointing out how weird the republican party was) was stopped immediately for some reason. they ran a campaign of vibes instead of policy when policy was what the american people wanted, and they got shit on for it
attached themselves to joe biden. didn't run an open primary. shifted rightward when they needed to shift leftward. didn't present any concrete solutions (not saying that trump's are good solutions, he just DID present them). ran perhaps the worst presidential candidate since romney in '12.
March 7, 2025 at 2:45 PM
attached themselves to joe biden. didn't run an open primary. shifted rightward when they needed to shift leftward. didn't present any concrete solutions (not saying that trump's are good solutions, he just DID present them). ran perhaps the worst presidential candidate since romney in '12.
and the democratic party has a responsibility to not run a dogshit candidate and one of the worst political campaigns in human history to convince voters to not vote for trump
they did not do this: because the democratic party is run by fucking morons and fascist-praising liberals
they did not do this: because the democratic party is run by fucking morons and fascist-praising liberals
March 7, 2025 at 5:13 AM
and the democratic party has a responsibility to not run a dogshit candidate and one of the worst political campaigns in human history to convince voters to not vote for trump
they did not do this: because the democratic party is run by fucking morons and fascist-praising liberals
they did not do this: because the democratic party is run by fucking morons and fascist-praising liberals
a new strategy is needed and that new strategy is not "kill all trans people"
March 7, 2025 at 5:10 AM
a new strategy is needed and that new strategy is not "kill all trans people"
shit i fucking hate china and i'm considering it at this point
March 7, 2025 at 3:17 AM
shit i fucking hate china and i'm considering it at this point
if the republican party wins in 2028 that is entirely the democratic party's own fault, just like how it was the democratic party's own fault they lost in 2024
March 7, 2025 at 3:13 AM
if the republican party wins in 2028 that is entirely the democratic party's own fault, just like how it was the democratic party's own fault they lost in 2024
you are a spineless coward and complicit in a genocide of american citizens. trans rights are human rights, you subhuman piece of shit. i can't wait for the day you're humiliated out of office.
March 7, 2025 at 3:12 AM
you are a spineless coward and complicit in a genocide of american citizens. trans rights are human rights, you subhuman piece of shit. i can't wait for the day you're humiliated out of office.