@labraxchaser.bsky.social
He did do something wrong. He boxed against women knowing full well that he's male.
June 4, 2025 at 2:04 PM
He did do something wrong. He boxed against women knowing full well that he's male.
He, and everyone around him, has known he is male for years. They've created this mess themselves.
June 4, 2025 at 2:02 PM
He, and everyone around him, has known he is male for years. They've created this mess themselves.
You can repeat that lie as many times as you like. The fact is that Imane is male. He is a man with a DSD that isn't his fault. But that doesn't mean that he gets to take opportunities and accolades reserved for women.
June 4, 2025 at 2:00 PM
You can repeat that lie as many times as you like. The fact is that Imane is male. He is a man with a DSD that isn't his fault. But that doesn't mean that he gets to take opportunities and accolades reserved for women.
He was mistaken for female at birth and in his culture correction for that error when it was realised didn't happen. Must be hard to deal with, but that doesn't mean he gets to take opportunities and accolades reserved for women as consolation.
June 4, 2025 at 1:57 PM
He was mistaken for female at birth and in his culture correction for that error when it was realised didn't happen. Must be hard to deal with, but that doesn't mean he gets to take opportunities and accolades reserved for women as consolation.
He was mistaken for female at birth and in his culture correction for that error when it was realised didn't happen. Must be hard to deal with, but that doesn't mean he gets to take opportunities and accolades reserved for women as consolation.
June 4, 2025 at 1:42 PM
He was mistaken for female at birth and in his culture correction for that error when it was realised didn't happen. Must be hard to deal with, but that doesn't mean he gets to take opportunities and accolades reserved for women as consolation.
After your comments on Imane Khelif maybe fantasy is more your genre.
June 2, 2025 at 1:53 PM
After your comments on Imane Khelif maybe fantasy is more your genre.
Wow, you're ahead of TRAs on the curve. The Kubler-Ross curve that is. TRAs are stuck at Denial, but you've already moved on to Bargaining. Clearly you know that the grift is over.
May 3, 2025 at 12:21 PM
Wow, you're ahead of TRAs on the curve. The Kubler-Ross curve that is. TRAs are stuck at Denial, but you've already moved on to Bargaining. Clearly you know that the grift is over.
Final Score: 1 - 0 (own goal)
May 1, 2025 at 5:44 PM
Final Score: 1 - 0 (own goal)
It's been law for years. It was your BS incorrect advice that confused everyone and everything. This mess is on you.
May 1, 2025 at 5:37 PM
It's been law for years. It was your BS incorrect advice that confused everyone and everything. This mess is on you.
The challenge isn't against the outcome. It's using Article 6 to challenge the Supreme Court's decision not to hear evidence from her.
The assumption that her input would have changed the outcome is the definition of hubris
Will lose, and wouldn't even affect the ruling if she won
The assumption that her input would have changed the outcome is the definition of hubris
Will lose, and wouldn't even affect the ruling if she won
April 30, 2025 at 6:41 AM
The challenge isn't against the outcome. It's using Article 6 to challenge the Supreme Court's decision not to hear evidence from her.
The assumption that her input would have changed the outcome is the definition of hubris
Will lose, and wouldn't even affect the ruling if she won
The assumption that her input would have changed the outcome is the definition of hubris
Will lose, and wouldn't even affect the ruling if she won
No they aren't banned. They just can't claim to be single sex if they're not.
April 26, 2025 at 10:02 AM
No they aren't banned. They just can't claim to be single sex if they're not.
Deliberate non-compliance will end up with organisations being taken to court. And those organisations will lose. And they will be forced to take action to improve compliance.
April 26, 2025 at 10:00 AM
Deliberate non-compliance will end up with organisations being taken to court. And those organisations will lose. And they will be forced to take action to improve compliance.
"In workplaces, it is compulsory to provide sufficient single-sex toilets, as well as sufficient single-sex changing and washing facilities where these facilities are needed."
The word "sufficient" here is important.
The word "sufficient" here is important.
April 26, 2025 at 9:57 AM
"In workplaces, it is compulsory to provide sufficient single-sex toilets, as well as sufficient single-sex changing and washing facilities where these facilities are needed."
The word "sufficient" here is important.
The word "sufficient" here is important.
The legislation they were reviewing was worded in terms of sex, not gender.
Sex exists to enable sexual reproduction and is about gametes, and the anatomy that produces them. Efforts to make this more complicated have failed.
Sex exists to enable sexual reproduction and is about gametes, and the anatomy that produces them. Efforts to make this more complicated have failed.
April 17, 2025 at 2:24 PM
The legislation they were reviewing was worded in terms of sex, not gender.
Sex exists to enable sexual reproduction and is about gametes, and the anatomy that produces them. Efforts to make this more complicated have failed.
Sex exists to enable sexual reproduction and is about gametes, and the anatomy that produces them. Efforts to make this more complicated have failed.
Sexes, not genders. The trans lobby did their very best to separate those two characteristics that used to be synonyms. So which is it? Are they synonymous or not?
April 17, 2025 at 2:05 PM
Sexes, not genders. The trans lobby did their very best to separate those two characteristics that used to be synonyms. So which is it? Are they synonymous or not?
What the hell are you on about? The person you are describing is male; biologically and legally. In fact you're describing me. I lost one testicle to cancer and the chemo left me sterile.
April 17, 2025 at 12:55 PM
What the hell are you on about? The person you are describing is male; biologically and legally. In fact you're describing me. I lost one testicle to cancer and the chemo left me sterile.
The project to redefine the world in terms of the nebulous feelings of gender (that only some people have), instead of the observable, measurable, and physical reality of sex, is dead in the UK. The only surprise is that it took so long.
April 17, 2025 at 10:09 AM
The project to redefine the world in terms of the nebulous feelings of gender (that only some people have), instead of the observable, measurable, and physical reality of sex, is dead in the UK. The only surprise is that it took so long.
The project to redefine the world in terms of the nebulous feelings of gender (that only some people have), instead of the observable, measurable, and physical reality of sex, is dead in the UK. The only surprise is that it took so long.
April 17, 2025 at 10:09 AM
The project to redefine the world in terms of the nebulous feelings of gender (that only some people have), instead of the observable, measurable, and physical reality of sex, is dead in the UK. The only surprise is that it took so long.
They weren't arguing over "gender". They were arguing about sex.
April 17, 2025 at 9:01 AM
They weren't arguing over "gender". They were arguing about sex.
It was a two-sided court case between FWS and the Scottish government. The Scottish government was the voice of trans. Ludicrous to say that the Scottish government and all of their resources couldn't muster the best argument possible.
April 17, 2025 at 9:00 AM
It was a two-sided court case between FWS and the Scottish government. The Scottish government was the voice of trans. Ludicrous to say that the Scottish government and all of their resources couldn't muster the best argument possible.
So now hundreds of companies and public bodies will have to correct their policies which were written based on your organisation's BS. How embarrassing for them and you.
April 16, 2025 at 4:36 PM
So now hundreds of companies and public bodies will have to correct their policies which were written based on your organisation's BS. How embarrassing for them and you.
6 billion is chump change for most governments of the world. Why hasn't it been done yet if that's all it takes?
February 22, 2025 at 11:28 PM
6 billion is chump change for most governments of the world. Why hasn't it been done yet if that's all it takes?
Kids? That's a grown ass man.
February 22, 2025 at 11:15 PM
Kids? That's a grown ass man.
If you're proud of a man stood atop a womens' podium you're a pathetic misogynistic pos.
February 22, 2025 at 9:18 PM
If you're proud of a man stood atop a womens' podium you're a pathetic misogynistic pos.
It's a simple yes/no question. Are you proud of it?
February 22, 2025 at 8:49 PM
It's a simple yes/no question. Are you proud of it?