Mmmm, the furs are strong in those ones. 🐶🐶🐶

I wonder: what if dark matter (2) is equivalent to, or the solution for, quantum gravity (1) and what if that makes dark energy (3) superfluous? What if there was no beginning (4)? Could that lead to a toe (5)?

Could an alternative be acceptable to Mississipi to automatically disable all adult options in settings based on location?

Duality becomes logical when one realizes or assumes that these dual (or more) descriptions describe measurement results of a system and not the system itself.

I think the answer to a question about the confidence that any fundamental theory is correct and real should be to ask what "correct" means and what "real" means. And then I think that no matter the confidence level for "correct", the confidence level for "real" will most of the time approach zero.

Yet one more example that we should be looking for terrestial intelligent life instead of extraterrestrial. Humanity will learn either way, but it looks like it is going to be the hard way.

Aha. Good thing they clarified that because that is indeed counterintuitive. At least it explains why it does nothing for you.

Space is modelled as not being empty and according to QFT particles are modelled as manifestations of fields. Saying "space is empty" or "particles are manifestations" is mistaking the map for the territory imo.

A solution that works for me is to only look at the "Following" feed and never look at the "Discover" feed.

I would sacrifice my life in a heartbeat if that would end all conflicts and suffering but I also think what is the point? So, the only opition for me is to avoid any "loud" people and hope that some time in the future intelligent life will emerge on Earth.

If only it was a clear and certain case of right and wrong. In almost all debates and conflicts I think all sides have valid and understandable points. Besides, how can I be certain my view is correct or better and worth the risk to myself, my family and friends?

The wave function is a model to make predictions. Nothing more. Like all models, it is in the words of Einstein "empty regards reality".

It is the same everywhere. But I think the problem is more that modern media exploits and exposes existing dumbness at a larger scale?

Bravo, but i think a science communicator should not say things like Einstein is wrong. With some understanding of science it is clear that you mean to say that Einsteins theory does not apply in certain conditions. Then I suggest you say it like that if you are serious about communicating science?

Not me I hope :-). I guess he means lEon uMsk?