LawHer
@kwebb08.bsky.social
I was raised this way. With purpose.
Also… all that work by tech writers at least in part, to avoid hiring actors… the cookie scene, sure cute, you could add that into the final edit, but how many tech writers worked on the prompts, just to avoid hiring human actors… unionized, represented human actors.
December 9, 2025 at 9:37 PM
Also… all that work by tech writers at least in part, to avoid hiring actors… the cookie scene, sure cute, you could add that into the final edit, but how many tech writers worked on the prompts, just to avoid hiring human actors… unionized, represented human actors.
I heard it as everyone he appoints (garble) “time is expired and then they are in default” like his favorite former personal attorney Habba
December 8, 2025 at 8:53 PM
I heard it as everyone he appoints (garble) “time is expired and then they are in default” like his favorite former personal attorney Habba
Um… nuh-uh
a man wearing a maroon sweater and a white shirt makes a funny face
Alt: a man wearing a maroon sweater and a white shirt makes a funny face
media.tenor.com
December 8, 2025 at 8:45 PM
Um… nuh-uh
Last paragraph: www.nvic.org/about/staff-...
Vicky Pebsworth Biography - NVIC Director of Research & Patient Safety
Complete Biography of Vicky Pebsworth, OP, PhD, RN - NVIC board member and volunteer Director of Research and Patient Safety.
www.nvic.org
December 4, 2025 at 6:24 PM
Last paragraph: www.nvic.org/about/staff-...
He didn’t even include student loans…
November 24, 2025 at 12:10 PM
He didn’t even include student loans…
The “Description of toxicity” in the article was singularly focused on toxic exposure to the end users, and zero consideration was given for costs of toxic exposure to laborers, plant workers, farmers, those who handle and are most exposed to Roundups toxicity. Total silence for that cost.
September 29, 2025 at 1:45 AM
The “Description of toxicity” in the article was singularly focused on toxic exposure to the end users, and zero consideration was given for costs of toxic exposure to laborers, plant workers, farmers, those who handle and are most exposed to Roundups toxicity. Total silence for that cost.
Round up is extremely toxic to those packaging, spraying, and coming into to direct contact with it. I am not anti-GMO, I love punnett squares, and have read Jennifer Doundna’s book and have whole sale bought into the hope of CRISPR tech. Maybe your piece is tongue in cheek, but seems pretty serious
September 29, 2025 at 1:36 AM
Round up is extremely toxic to those packaging, spraying, and coming into to direct contact with it. I am not anti-GMO, I love punnett squares, and have read Jennifer Doundna’s book and have whole sale bought into the hope of CRISPR tech. Maybe your piece is tongue in cheek, but seems pretty serious
So, I do not dispute the scientific evidence of the benefits of using roundup in commercial farming, nor that very little makes it to consumers’ refrigerators and tables. However, it is not harmless to those who handle it, as your article so flippantly refers (as long as you don’t bathe in it).
September 29, 2025 at 1:27 AM
So, I do not dispute the scientific evidence of the benefits of using roundup in commercial farming, nor that very little makes it to consumers’ refrigerators and tables. However, it is not harmless to those who handle it, as your article so flippantly refers (as long as you don’t bathe in it).
As a lawyer I endorse this.
August 29, 2025 at 10:21 PM
As a lawyer I endorse this.
WHO IS “THEY”??? Always with the “THEY say” WHO THE FUCK IS “THEY?” Damnit THEY infuriate the fuck out of me!!!
August 13, 2025 at 9:15 PM
WHO IS “THEY”??? Always with the “THEY say” WHO THE FUCK IS “THEY?” Damnit THEY infuriate the fuck out of me!!!
The constant “take” of “I don’t know the thing means that no one knows the thing” is why we are here. The sheer arrogance of assuming because he does not know who studied and/or what study was performed therefore equating to “no one ever studied the effect of carbon dioxide” is maddening.
August 13, 2025 at 9:11 PM
The constant “take” of “I don’t know the thing means that no one knows the thing” is why we are here. The sheer arrogance of assuming because he does not know who studied and/or what study was performed therefore equating to “no one ever studied the effect of carbon dioxide” is maddening.
Noted! Thank you for the info
July 11, 2025 at 4:11 PM
Noted! Thank you for the info
This means no shopping at Kroger and Kroger corporate owned places right? I do not cross any picket line, even if the physical picket line is not at my location, and will happily take my business elsewhere.
July 11, 2025 at 4:06 PM
This means no shopping at Kroger and Kroger corporate owned places right? I do not cross any picket line, even if the physical picket line is not at my location, and will happily take my business elsewhere.
I guess she didn’t also visit the Checkpoint Charlie Museum. A whole museum dedicated to all of the ways that people circumvented the walls, even under threat of being shot on sight by the Soviet border patrol.
July 11, 2025 at 4:04 PM
I guess she didn’t also visit the Checkpoint Charlie Museum. A whole museum dedicated to all of the ways that people circumvented the walls, even under threat of being shot on sight by the Soviet border patrol.
Now someone ask him how many of those are Veterans, or even more deplorable, active duty service personnel… I’ll wait. Ask him how many work multiple shite jobs because employers won’t give them enough hours to be full-time.
June 30, 2025 at 7:55 PM
Now someone ask him how many of those are Veterans, or even more deplorable, active duty service personnel… I’ll wait. Ask him how many work multiple shite jobs because employers won’t give them enough hours to be full-time.
They start with “low hanging fruit,” the easiest to attack, then progress to more complex arguments as they modify and perfect their strategy(ies). So yes, I do think this is the same foundational method that will progress to attacks on birthright citizenship.
June 30, 2025 at 3:03 PM
They start with “low hanging fruit,” the easiest to attack, then progress to more complex arguments as they modify and perfect their strategy(ies). So yes, I do think this is the same foundational method that will progress to attacks on birthright citizenship.
According to the article, this only applies to naturalized citizens, not those entitled to birthright citizenship.
June 30, 2025 at 2:55 PM
According to the article, this only applies to naturalized citizens, not those entitled to birthright citizenship.
Why do you think they are not regular federal LEOs? Why do you think they are militia, or proud boys? I’m sure there are a few pretenders out there, always are. But why wouldn’t LEOs disguise themselves? Also not new tactics. Undercover agents have done it for years.
June 28, 2025 at 8:14 PM
Why do you think they are not regular federal LEOs? Why do you think they are militia, or proud boys? I’m sure there are a few pretenders out there, always are. But why wouldn’t LEOs disguise themselves? Also not new tactics. Undercover agents have done it for years.
I am familiar with federal LE training, had discussions with police chiefs, represented people on the receiving end of such uses of force. What you are seeing are highly organized, learned, and honed skills. They are good at their jobs. No militia is that good.
June 28, 2025 at 8:07 PM
I am familiar with federal LE training, had discussions with police chiefs, represented people on the receiving end of such uses of force. What you are seeing are highly organized, learned, and honed skills. They are good at their jobs. No militia is that good.
“For them to consult legal rights; IF THEY HAVE THAT.” So maybe they have no legal rights, is what he’s saying. Human beings present in this country with maybe ZERO legal rights is what he just said. Who knows? Who could know whether a human in the US has *legal* rights?
June 27, 2025 at 3:45 PM
“For them to consult legal rights; IF THEY HAVE THAT.” So maybe they have no legal rights, is what he’s saying. Human beings present in this country with maybe ZERO legal rights is what he just said. Who knows? Who could know whether a human in the US has *legal* rights?
What we see in this video is refined training. Period. Can law enforcement officers be racist, xenophobic, bigots? Yes. A former local sheriff was a proud oath keeper. Those are not mutually exclusive. But these are not pardoned J6ers as so many have recently parroted. It’s a dangerous narrative.
June 27, 2025 at 1:13 PM
What we see in this video is refined training. Period. Can law enforcement officers be racist, xenophobic, bigots? Yes. A former local sheriff was a proud oath keeper. Those are not mutually exclusive. But these are not pardoned J6ers as so many have recently parroted. It’s a dangerous narrative.
Yes! They should have to show their badges and produce warrants and be held accountable for these abuses and violations of their oaths. 100%
June 23, 2025 at 1:16 AM
Yes! They should have to show their badges and produce warrants and be held accountable for these abuses and violations of their oaths. 100%
No they are not!! This is how law enforcement officers are trained! Please stop saying this. It excuses the abuses perpetrated by sworn law enforcement officers who violate their oaths to the constitution. These are out of control law enforcement officers! Stop saying they are anything else!!
June 23, 2025 at 1:12 AM
No they are not!! This is how law enforcement officers are trained! Please stop saying this. It excuses the abuses perpetrated by sworn law enforcement officers who violate their oaths to the constitution. These are out of control law enforcement officers! Stop saying they are anything else!!