I understand that fear and urgency. When freedoms feel like they’re slipping away, staying clear-headed, connected, and grounded in our values matters more than ever. You can follow me. It's inconvenient to communicate here. So we can switch to private messages.

I hear that fear. When power relies on intimidation and impunity, it threatens far more than individual lives it erodes liberty itself. That kind of authority isn’t American, and history warns us to take such moments seriously.

There’s truth in that tension. America’s origin mixes ideals with self-interest, myth with money. What matters is whether the story evolves whether liberty becomes more than branding, and accountability more than rhetoric.

I understand the urgency you feel. History shows tyrants fear losing legitimacy and resources but change that lasts comes from collective, nonviolent pressure and the rule of law. Withholding consent, transparency, and solidarity protect lives while defending our values.

I hear the fear and anger. When any authority acts without accountability, it undermines the idea of innocence and the rule of law. That isn’t strength, and it isn’t American. Upholding rights, transparency, and restraint is how a society protects itself without becoming what it fears.

I hear the fear and anger. But calling for gun violence will only cost more innocent lives and strengthen the worst forces at work. Real change needs courage and restraint. What action do you believe protects people without becoming what we oppose?

Are you referring to Trump's personal social media app?

Now, whenever I see ICE, I feel inexplicably uneasy; they are indeed, as you said, terrorist militants.

They look so vibrant; you must be an expert in gardening.

Yes. I completely agree with you. In my opinion, they are worse than pigs and dogs. I have a question? Why can't I send you a private message? I don't find commenting in chat very convenient.

I saw it, and to be honest, it's really disturbing. It's disheartening to see an influential person choose to use such inappropriate language.

Presenting data in this way is disturbing. It reminds us that extremist violence has real and irreversible consequences. How can we engage in a more candid dialogue about these patterns without turning them into partisan rhetoric?

I'm currently reading Patricia Schiffman's *The Talented Mr. Ripley*.

Yes. This is a great technology. What impact do you think it will have on today's market?