ktj_microbes
ktj-microbes.mstdn.science.ap.brid.gy
ktj_microbes
@ktj-microbes.mstdn.science.ap.brid.gy
At work, I study microbes using bioinformatic tools and DNA sequencing.

(See https://ktjmicrobes.com/)

I'll try to repost papers found on bsky and elsewhere […]

🌉 bridged from ⁂ https://mstdn.science/@ktj_microbes, follow @ap.brid.gy to interact
Reposted by ktj_microbes
New preprint with Emma Bell, Anders Andersson, Karin Garefelt et al.

We assessed the use of 16S and 18S rRNA gene metabarcoding as input for machine learning models predicting abiotic and biotic factors.

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.25.701552v1
The marine microbiome can accurately predict its chemical and biological environment
The microbiome responds to physicochemical changes in the environment, making it a sensitive indicator of ecosystem status. Monitoring microbial communities in aquatic systems is therefore essential for understanding ecosystem health and responses to change. Traditionally reliant on microscopy, monitoring programmes are increasingly incorporating DNA-based approaches leveraging on advances in high-throughput sequencing. In this study, we evaluate the potential of using DNA metabarcoding to predict abiotic and biotic parameters across the spatiotemporal gradients of the Baltic Sea. The dataset comprises 397 seawater samples integrating prokaryotic (16S rRNA gene) and eukaryotic (18S rRNA gene) metabarcoding data with environmental measurements and plankton microscopy counts. Random Forest models based on metabarcoding data accurately predicted a range of physicochemical parameters and showed performance comparably to more complex machine learning algorithms. Models based on 16S rRNA gene data tended to perform better than those based on 18S rRNA gene data, with amplicon sequence variant-level data yielding the best results. Metabarcoding outperformed plankton microscopy in predicting abiotic factors and effectively predicted the presence of phytoplankton and zooplankton genera using ≤1 L of water. Models trained on independent datasets accurately predicted several of the physicochemical parameters, but performed weaker on others, highlighting the potential and challenges for their transferability. Furthermore, our predictions closely matched the observed HELCOM indicator values for assessing good environmental status, suggesting the utility of microbiome-based approaches in regional marine monitoring frameworks. These findings underscore the potential of environmental DNA as a tool for ecosystem monitoring and management in dynamic coastal systems. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Swedish Research Council, 2021-05563 Swedish Research Council for Environment Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning, 2022-01515 European Union, 101064544 Sverker Lerheden donation
www.biorxiv.org
January 26, 2026 at 11:26 AM
New preprint with Emma Bell, Anders Andersson, Karin Garefelt et al.

We assessed the use of 16S and 18S rRNA gene metabarcoding as input for machine learning models predicting abiotic and biotic factors.

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.25.701552v1
The marine microbiome can accurately predict its chemical and biological environment
The microbiome responds to physicochemical changes in the environment, making it a sensitive indicator of ecosystem status. Monitoring microbial communities in aquatic systems is therefore essential for understanding ecosystem health and responses to change. Traditionally reliant on microscopy, monitoring programmes are increasingly incorporating DNA-based approaches leveraging on advances in high-throughput sequencing. In this study, we evaluate the potential of using DNA metabarcoding to predict abiotic and biotic parameters across the spatiotemporal gradients of the Baltic Sea. The dataset comprises 397 seawater samples integrating prokaryotic (16S rRNA gene) and eukaryotic (18S rRNA gene) metabarcoding data with environmental measurements and plankton microscopy counts. Random Forest models based on metabarcoding data accurately predicted a range of physicochemical parameters and showed performance comparably to more complex machine learning algorithms. Models based on 16S rRNA gene data tended to perform better than those based on 18S rRNA gene data, with amplicon sequence variant-level data yielding the best results. Metabarcoding outperformed plankton microscopy in predicting abiotic factors and effectively predicted the presence of phytoplankton and zooplankton genera using ≤1 L of water. Models trained on independent datasets accurately predicted several of the physicochemical parameters, but performed weaker on others, highlighting the potential and challenges for their transferability. Furthermore, our predictions closely matched the observed HELCOM indicator values for assessing good environmental status, suggesting the utility of microbiome-based approaches in regional marine monitoring frameworks. These findings underscore the potential of environmental DNA as a tool for ecosystem monitoring and management in dynamic coastal systems. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Swedish Research Council, 2021-05563 Swedish Research Council for Environment Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning, 2022-01515 European Union, 101064544 Sverker Lerheden donation
www.biorxiv.org
January 26, 2026 at 11:26 AM