Karthik Sekar
@kslearns.bsky.social
Data scientist, vegan, bioprocessing, author of After Meat
So why wasn't this enough to put the whole situation to bed? This seems like good reasoning.
Why was it still on the task list for your consequent EICs to even consider? What would have resolution, other than retraction, looked like?
Why was it still on the task list for your consequent EICs to even consider? What would have resolution, other than retraction, looked like?
July 28, 2025 at 6:27 PM
So why wasn't this enough to put the whole situation to bed? This seems like good reasoning.
Why was it still on the task list for your consequent EICs to even consider? What would have resolution, other than retraction, looked like?
Why was it still on the task list for your consequent EICs to even consider? What would have resolution, other than retraction, looked like?
Wait, you didn't have control over the press releases?
That was one of the biggest issues here. The press release for this paper said wholesale replacement of phosphorus with arsenic, which the paper never asserted.
That was one of the biggest issues here. The press release for this paper said wholesale replacement of phosphorus with arsenic, which the paper never asserted.
July 28, 2025 at 6:17 PM
Wait, you didn't have control over the press releases?
That was one of the biggest issues here. The press release for this paper said wholesale replacement of phosphorus with arsenic, which the paper never asserted.
That was one of the biggest issues here. The press release for this paper said wholesale replacement of phosphorus with arsenic, which the paper never asserted.