Thanks Rick!

Thanks Paisley!

Throw in a three bedroom or two while you’re at it

So, no, this is not a tit for tat situation. Context and power matter a lot. Rounding everything up to “cancel culture”
or ”consequence culture” only advances one highly motivated perspective.

Recall that the closest analogue was allegations that the Biden admin was connected to social media moderation policy. Justice Barrett found no “concrete link.”

There are two big legal issues when states try to fill gaps in fed health insurance regulations: (1) the insurance issue is more likely to require new state legislation than the pharmacy issue & (2) states can’t touch two of the biggest types of insurance - “self-insured” employer plans & Medicare

lambdalegal.org/newsroom/us_...

The insurance companies are required to comply as a condition of participation.

I don’t understand the objection. This is reporting about a ban being implemented in federally managed plans.