I'd argue it's truly minimal, we even managed to remove any morsel of meaning from it
I'd argue it's truly minimal, we even managed to remove any morsel of meaning from it
the optimal solution here is clearly using Braille for the column labels, which reduces the true data-ink ratio from a measly 1:45 (yours) to an impressive 1:24 (mine). </sarcasm>
the optimal solution here is clearly using Braille for the column labels, which reduces the true data-ink ratio from a measly 1:45 (yours) to an impressive 1:24 (mine). </sarcasm>
which, in turn, is understandable because we are a big overhead cost, that is - as you note- difficult to calculate returns on
which, in turn, is understandable because we are a big overhead cost, that is - as you note- difficult to calculate returns on