Easy Target
LightNews LightNews
banner
korniszonek.bsky.social
Easy Target
@korniszonek.bsky.social
1 followers 2 following 31 posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
korniszonek.bsky.social
Now whine, that this is "official narrative", that "this is wikipedia", or that I've got 2 followers, lol.

Every single post of yours on Ukraine is misleading, full of hate and stuffed with cheap Kremlin manipulations.

You are a disgusting, despicable piece of shit who sucks Putin's cock 24/7.
December 3, 2025 at 3:04 PM
korniszonek.bsky.social
6. 2014 coup - a lie, millions protested agains pro-Putin bitch Yanukovych en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolut...
7. Johnson derailed talks - a blantant, primitive lie theins.ru/en/antifake/...
Revolution of Dignity - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
December 3, 2025 at 2:58 PM
korniszonek.bsky.social
4. Civil War - a lie, Ukr was illegally attacked by Ru - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_...
5. 18k Ukr killed - a lie, 14.2-4 died, incl. 6.5k "separatists" - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualt...
War in Donbas - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
December 3, 2025 at 2:58 PM
korniszonek.bsky.social
Look, how many russian 💩 in just one post of yours:
1. "A comedian" - typical Olgino slur for Zelensky
2. 78% - a lie, he received 73.22% - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Uk...
3. elected with a mandate - you made this up, no source
December 3, 2025 at 2:58 PM
korniszonek.bsky.social
You are flooding the infosphere with lies. Fake data. Made up events. Fabricated photos. All fact-checked and debunked long ago. The source of every lie you pass on, every primitive manipulation, even the source of certain phrases, is propaganda departament in Moscow.
December 3, 2025 at 12:33 PM
korniszonek.bsky.social
lying russian turd
December 3, 2025 at 6:13 AM
korniszonek.bsky.social
"Historical facts" published by a pro-kremlin tabloid Mronline - a source by true fact-checkers for the truest fact checkers like russian turds
On 1 April, the former Swiss intelligence officer Jacques Baud made startling revelations about the war in Ukraine. A large chunk of the Ukrainian armed forces were made up of a 102,000-strong paramilitary militia that included, he claimed, far-right militants, most of whom were foreign fighters. The war, which the media claims began on 24 February, in fact started eight days before, with a Ukrainian attempt to invade the Russia-controlled Donbas region in the east of the country. This led to a “massacre of the Donbas population”, and included Polish saboteurs who were looking to carry out chemical attacks, forcing Vladimir Putin to respond. All was going to plan for Putin, said Baud. The slowdown of Russian forces before Kyiv was simply a “consequence of having achieved their objectives” – ie, pressuring Volodymyr Zelensky into negotiations. Baud’s essay spread like wildfire. Three far-left websites – MROnline, Labour Heartlands and Marxist.com – republished it in full. The film director Oliver Stone pushed it hard. Aaron Maté, of The Grayzone, featured it on his cult YouTube show. John Pilger went wild for it. The former Jeremy Corbyn adviser Steve Howell retweeted it, adding: “judge for yourself – an alternative view on the military situation to the one given in most Western media.”
December 3, 2025 at 6:12 AM
korniszonek.bsky.social
Check mate, you dumb russian cunt
bsky.app/profile/prom...
promieniowanie.bsky.social Kamil @promieniowanie.bsky.social · Nov 29
Here's your deleted post filled with russian lies regarding russian casualties in Donbas along with UN stats. 14k ethnic russians dead is a complete nonsense. Go back to reading Sputnik, comrade 🇷🇺💩🇷🇺
Kremlin lies regarding 14k dead ethnic russians in Donbas have been debunked years ago. The overall number of estimated deaths in the war in Donbas from 6 April 2014 to 31 December 2021 was 14,200–14,400. This included about 6,500 pro-Russian separatist fighters, 4,400 Ukrainian fighters, and 3,404 civilians.
December 3, 2025 at 6:00 AM
korniszonek.bsky.social
report and block, that account is a russian troll.
December 3, 2025 at 5:56 AM
korniszonek.bsky.social
Why should anyone pay attention to an algorithm running a social media account filled with thousands of nearly identical virulent anti-Ukrainian lies, primitive memes and manipulations copied from RT or Sputnik?
an empty trash can with the words `` anything else ? '' on it .
ALT: an empty trash can with the words `` anything else ? '' on it .
media.tenor.com
December 3, 2025 at 5:54 AM
korniszonek.bsky.social
You are wrong. The Budapest Memorandum did not conain security guaranteees to Ukraine.
korniszonek.bsky.social Easy Target @korniszonek.bsky.social · Dec 3
Unfortunately. No mention of guarantees of any kind from any of sides.
www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65...
Budapes memorandum. All sides confirm the following: The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, to respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine; The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, and that none of their weapons will ever be used against Ukraine except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations; The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, to refrain from economic coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest the exercise by Ukraine of the rights inherent in its sovereignty and thus to secure advantages of any kind; The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their commitment to seek immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine, as a non-nuclear-weapon State party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, if Ukraine should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used. Oto uporządkowana druga część tekstu. Podobnie jak wcześniej, usunąłem zbędne podziały wierszy wynikające z formatowania PDF i nadałem całości czytelną strukturę dokumentu końcowego. 5. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm, in the case of Ukraine, their commitment not to use nuclear weapons against any non-nuclear-weapon State party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, except in the case of an attack on themselves, their territories or dependent territories, their armed forces, or their allies, by such a State in association or alliance with a nuclear-weapon State; 6. Ukraine, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America will consult in the event a situation arises that raises a question concerning these commitments. This Memorandum will become applicable upon signature. Signed in four copies having equal validity in the Ukrainian, English and Russian languages. For Ukraine: (Signed) Leonid D. KUCHMA For the Russian Federation: (Signed) Boris N. YELTSIN For the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: (Signed) John MAJOR For the United States of America: (Signed) William J. CLINTON
December 3, 2025 at 5:44 AM
korniszonek.bsky.social
Unfortunately. No mention of guarantees of any kind from any of sides.
www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65...
Budapes memorandum. All sides confirm the following: The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, to respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine; The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, and that none of their weapons will ever be used against Ukraine except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations; The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, to refrain from economic coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest the exercise by Ukraine of the rights inherent in its sovereignty and thus to secure advantages of any kind; The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their commitment to seek immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine, as a non-nuclear-weapon State party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, if Ukraine should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used. Oto uporządkowana druga część tekstu. Podobnie jak wcześniej, usunąłem zbędne podziały wierszy wynikające z formatowania PDF i nadałem całości czytelną strukturę dokumentu końcowego. 5. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm, in the case of Ukraine, their commitment not to use nuclear weapons against any non-nuclear-weapon State party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, except in the case of an attack on themselves, their territories or dependent territories, their armed forces, or their allies, by such a State in association or alliance with a nuclear-weapon State; 6. Ukraine, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America will consult in the event a situation arises that raises a question concerning these commitments. This Memorandum will become applicable upon signature. Signed in four copies having equal validity in the Ukrainian, English and Russian languages. For Ukraine: (Signed) Leonid D. KUCHMA For the Russian Federation: (Signed) Boris N. YELTSIN For the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: (Signed) John MAJOR For the United States of America: (Signed) William J. CLINTON
December 3, 2025 at 2:45 AM
korniszonek.bsky.social
Exactly. I'm Polish and it is my sincere hope that these past years of steadfast resistance against Russian aggression will herald a new era for Ukraine. Their national myth is being written in blood and sacrifice—a terrible price, but one that some nations are forced to pay simply to exist.
December 3, 2025 at 1:29 AM
korniszonek.bsky.social
I dunno, I got blocked right away.

I'm really tired of reading a millionth naive advice for Ukrainians that they should immediately stop the senseless bloodshed, sign the peace treaty and concede, like the only purpose of this whole thing is making the arms dealers even more rich.
December 3, 2025 at 1:11 AM
korniszonek.bsky.social
Do you naively believe that immediate cease fire will miraculously save all remaining Ukrainian lives? After all they've done (e.g. resisted russian authority) millions would be subject of brutal russification, repressions, ethnic cleansing, etc. Is that what you advocate to Palestinians today?
December 3, 2025 at 12:44 AM
korniszonek.bsky.social
1. 100% yes
2. An socioeconomical philosophical concept which (according to some online anime commies), has never materialized, but which (according to others), has materialized under Stalin and Mao and Pol Pot and make millions of ppl smile through tears.
3. Social democracy in Scandinavia.
December 3, 2025 at 12:28 AM
korniszonek.bsky.social
In the meantime, here's a collection of lists you're on. Racism, harrasment, zoophilia, terrorism, MAGA, Putinist, transphobia, nazism - you name it.
December 2, 2025 at 10:29 PM
korniszonek.bsky.social
I'm just pointing out that poverty as a global problem is diminishing, despite the hysteria. The causes are numerous, some believe that dekulakisation is one of them, other believe that China lifted 800m ppl out of poverty because of their orthodox implementation of Marxist princip.
December 2, 2025 at 9:42 PM
korniszonek.bsky.social
Meanwhile poverty:
cepr.shorthandstories.com/history-pove...
Menu The Historical Record Visualizing Income and Poverty Effectiveness of Growth Breaking Down Poverty Reduction Twitter Facebook A History of Poverty Worldwide How poverty reduction accelerated in recent decades By David Rosnick May 21, 2019 Much has been written about the huge gains in global poverty reduction in recent decades. There is broad agreement that this has been one of the great success stories in the history of international economic development, and scholars have rightly sought to determine how and why this success story occurred. However, an examination of surprisingly few factors greatly narrows our search for explanations. Consider that in 1800, by a $1.90 per day standard, 81 percent of people worldwide were in poverty. One-hundred-ninety years later, only 44 percent were in poverty — a reduction of less than one-fifth of a percentage point per year. By contrast, in the 28 years since 1990, the rate of $1.90 per day poverty fell by more than 1.2 percentage points per year to less than 10 percent. Putting aside any question as to the validity or general usefulness of this particular definition of poverty, in recent decades the world has by this measure progressed considerably. Bloomberg columnist Noah Smith described this decline as “incredible — nothing short of a miracle.” But scratch beneath the surface and we find the far more mundane fact that China and India had grown to the point they they happened to have accumulated large numbers of poor people just below the poverty line. Consequently, modest growth in these two countries alone would have sufficed to lift a great number of the world’s poor out of poverty. How did these countries accomplish this? Insofar as rapid poverty reduction resulted from faster growth in China, it is fair to say that following the neoliberal Washington Consensus was not a significant factor. As with most Asian success stories of the twentieth century, the Chinese government played a central role in managing t…
December 2, 2025 at 8:59 PM
korniszonek.bsky.social
Speaking of Mearsheimer: I found interesting this short and consize rebuttal of a few thesis that made him a guest of honor in RT, Sputnik and elsewhere.
www.analyse-und-kritik.net/Dateien/648e...
www.analyse-und-kritik.net
December 2, 2025 at 8:23 PM
korniszonek.bsky.social
Thank god's there's alternative to all that subversive western brainwashing.
putin on tv everywhere
December 2, 2025 at 6:01 PM
korniszonek.bsky.social
My third eye will open when I watch all the Diesen's interviews with Alexandr Dugin and relisten the Carlson's interview with Vladimir Vladimirovich.
December 2, 2025 at 4:46 PM
korniszonek.bsky.social
*vague

You're not proving anything, just letting off steam
December 2, 2025 at 4:19 PM
korniszonek.bsky.social
"All of them", "none of them" - so vage and shapeless llike fog.

You're saying that Ukr is one of the most corrupt states out there?
➡️ Ukr 139 vs Russia 161/193 - www.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/wb_...
➡️Ukr 105 vs Ru 154/180 - www.transparency.org/en/
Control of corruption by country, around the world | TheGlobalEconomy.com
The average for 2023 based on 193 countries was -0.04 points. The highest value was in Denmark: 2.38 points and the lowest value was in Syria: -1.75 points. The indicator is available from 1996 to 2...
www.theglobaleconomy.com
December 2, 2025 at 4:17 PM