Marcin Konopka
konopka.dev
Marcin Konopka
@konopka.dev
Catholic.
Space Industry enthusiast.
Rocket Lab stock hodler.
Follow me @ X: https://x.com/konopka_tg
This was just a scrub not a failure
March 5, 2025 at 9:33 PM
SpaceX built Starlink, not the government. What is your point. SpaceX is the launch provider for the government and is the cheapest one.
March 5, 2025 at 9:32 PM
SpaceX is the cheapest and most reliable launch provider for the US government. Also SpaceX put an end to most cost+ contracts that largely benefits US taxpayers.
March 5, 2025 at 11:49 AM
It wasn’t a weather related scrub.
March 5, 2025 at 11:47 AM
Nothing. There are no cost+ government contracts on Starship.

Additionally this wasn’t a rocket failure, the rock will just lift off at different time. The only loss is in the boiled off propellants.
March 5, 2025 at 11:47 AM
40 second mark is the point they can hold and decide if they go for launch or want to try at different time.

Pretty usual for the industry.
March 5, 2025 at 11:44 AM
You clearly don’t understand engineering and manufacturing.
January 2, 2025 at 9:48 PM
He (co)created:
- Zip2
- PayPal
- SpaceX
- OpenAI
- Neuralink
- Boring Company

The only company he bought was Twitter. He also was early Tesla investor.
January 2, 2025 at 9:41 PM
SpaceX is well managed and actually saves taxpayers money (compared if gov were to launch its own payloads).
November 18, 2024 at 3:00 PM
Government tried to have multiple contractors for space related things but those simply failed or became money pits. SpaceX is one of the few space companies that is well managed and capable to achieve government goals.
November 12, 2024 at 5:59 PM
I see you are a marxist. Socialism won’t work. You can believe me. We tried to implement it in our country.

Socialism = no goods to consume = empty shelves and long queues
February 15, 2024 at 10:28 AM
The issue is Keynesian/MMT model dominance, not capitalism.
February 15, 2024 at 10:23 AM
Spaceships don’t go straight up - that would be inefficient.

They perform circularish maneuvers as it’s better way to fight gravity😉
February 13, 2024 at 2:16 PM
They knew other companies had good lobbyists and relaying on single vehicle will be considered risky by congress pressuring them to allocate greater funds towards Artemis program.

It’s just politics.
February 12, 2024 at 1:58 PM
It was accepted in first round (even though it was least suitable option from the three accepted) as a backup due to its low cost, and SpaceX being aerospace industry leader.

But due to budget reduction NASA did a brilliant stunt. They picked ONLY SpaceX.
February 12, 2024 at 1:56 PM
What are you taking about? Starship development eats all the money they get from NASA. They cannot use HLS money to finance Starlink.

Starship won HLS program due to administration change and NASA budget shrinking.
February 12, 2024 at 1:49 PM
Meanwhile SpaceX has two such systems under development- Starlink and Starship.
February 12, 2024 at 12:21 PM
Most missions is Starlink, but claiming it’s the only “reliable customer” (which btw is not - most such constellations went bankrupt) is simply false.
February 12, 2024 at 12:17 PM
It’s hard to be profitable if you have such complex system as Starship under development.

Are the comparable companies like BlueOrigin (New Glenn under development) profitable? I would guess they are not.
February 12, 2024 at 12:15 PM
Are you serious?
SpaceX has multiple reliable customers, including NASA (resupply missions and astronaut transfers to ISS + all the other stuff).

What is the source of your information?
February 12, 2024 at 9:39 AM
What are you talking about?
February 11, 2024 at 10:09 PM
SpaceX is a joke that managed 96 orbital launches last year and 10 launches in January this year.
February 11, 2024 at 10:05 PM