My theory is that he views everything through the lens of zero-sum games. He can get away with that with real-estate transactions for the most part.

Then they came after the naturalized citizens' speech,
whose status could still be questioned,
and I did not speak out—
because I was born here.

Then they came after my speech—
and there was no one left to speak for me.

Then they came after the green card holders' speech,
who had nearly all constitutional protections, and I did not speak out—
because I was not a permanent resident.

Then they came after the visa holders' speech,
who had limited protections under the Constitution,
and I did not speak out—
because I was not on a visa.

Totally. I’m going to generate one for each of the readings on my syllabus.

Here's the AI generated podcast: notebooklm.google.com/notebook/db4...

Here's one on a recent paper with Scott Batlle, Peter Heller, and Tim Schittekatte in #ScienceAdvances on #EnergyPoverty www.science.org/doi/full/10....

Don’t call be Shirley….

Implications for Platforms: Simple, evidence-based design tweaks can significantly curb bias without overhauling systems. Also, and totally self-serving, collaboration between platforms and researchers is key to tackling systemic discrimination.

Looking forward to your thoughts!