I left the Dems because I stopped feeling represented. I’m not refusing to help—I’m choosing to demand better. A third party won’t build itself if we keep settling for the same system.

Acknowledging that both parties serve corporate interests doesn’t mean I think they’re exactly the same. It means I’m tired of pretending weak reform is real progress. If that makes me sound like a toddler to you, maybe your politics are just stuck in preschool.

Saying one party is ‘less evil’ doesn’t mean it’s working for us. That’s not cynicism—it’s clarity. I want more than damage control. I want a system that isn’t owned by the rich.

I’m not peddling ‘both sides the same Kool-Aid.’ I’m pointing out that we keep getting stuck in binary thinking, when the system itself—no matter who’s in charge—is built to serve corporate power, not the people. One party may be more harmful, but that doesn’t make the other truly liberatory.

Global tariffs can create market tension, but they’re just one factor in a much bigger picture. The real issue is a system built on instability and profit-driven chaos. Tariffs add to the pressure, but capitalism itself is the problem.

Switching figureheads doesn’t change the system. Kamala, Biden, Trump—both parties serve corporate interests Wall Street, not the people. The market is crashing because capitalism is unstable—not because the wrong figurehead is in office. Stop mistaking representation for liberation.

she's not for the people she's not for the people she's not for the people 🙄

Can we talk about how religion was/is used to control people?

www.paypal.me/Kiwibutterfly

We already did that.

aas.princeton.edu/news/when-sl...

Not to be a doomer, but the Democrats are not going to save us in this situation. It's annoying, but we need to mobilize what civil society we have left to defy this insanity and remove these people from power.