@kiranbatth.bsky.social
Companies like Home Depot sharing surveillance data with law enforcement can violate people’s privacy and rights because investors are worried that surveillance tools and data could be used without clear oversight, potentially harming civil rights and creating privacy risks #UCWCOMM150
January 19, 2026 at 7:40 AM
Companies like Home Depot sharing surveillance data with law enforcement can violate people’s privacy and rights because investors are worried that surveillance tools and data could be used without clear oversight, potentially harming civil rights and creating privacy risks #UCWCOMM150
ICE should not be allowed to expand its surveillance with limited public oversight because it is using powerful technologies with little transparency, which raises serious concerns about privacy, misuse, and lack of accountability.
#UCWCOMM150
@houmanmehrabian.bsky.social
#UCWCOMM150
@houmanmehrabian.bsky.social
January 19, 2026 at 7:35 AM
ICE should not be allowed to expand its surveillance with limited public oversight because it is using powerful technologies with little transparency, which raises serious concerns about privacy, misuse, and lack of accountability.
#UCWCOMM150
@houmanmehrabian.bsky.social
#UCWCOMM150
@houmanmehrabian.bsky.social
#UCWCOMM150 AI surveillance is more of a threat to democracy than a security tool because it is often used by governments to monitor people, control protests, and weaken democratic freedoms, especially in fragile democracies.
January 19, 2026 at 7:32 AM
#UCWCOMM150 AI surveillance is more of a threat to democracy than a security tool because it is often used by governments to monitor people, control protests, and weaken democratic freedoms, especially in fragile democracies.
Do governments have too much control over vulnerable groups because of constant surveillance? #UCWCOMM150
January 19, 2026 at 6:16 AM
Do governments have too much control over vulnerable groups because of constant surveillance? #UCWCOMM150
Police should use AI facial recognition only with strict limits, because while it may improve safety, it can threaten privacy and increase bias if not carefully regulated.
January 17, 2026 at 4:09 AM
Police should use AI facial recognition only with strict limits, because while it may improve safety, it can threaten privacy and increase bias if not carefully regulated.
#UCWCOMM150 Police should use AI facial recognition only in limited cases, where it clearly improves public safety and strong safeguards are in place to protect privacy and civil liberties.
January 17, 2026 at 4:07 AM
#UCWCOMM150 Police should use AI facial recognition only in limited cases, where it clearly improves public safety and strong safeguards are in place to protect privacy and civil liberties.
#UCWCOMM150 Police should be allowed to use AI facial recognition only with strict rules, because while it can help with safety, it also risks invading privacy and unfairly targeting people if not carefully controlled.
January 17, 2026 at 4:05 AM
#UCWCOMM150 Police should be allowed to use AI facial recognition only with strict rules, because while it can help with safety, it also risks invading privacy and unfairly targeting people if not carefully controlled.
To what extent should police use AI-powered facial recognition on body cameras, given concerns about privacy, bias, and public safety?
January 17, 2026 at 4:01 AM
To what extent should police use AI-powered facial recognition on body cameras, given concerns about privacy, bias, and public safety?
U.S. tech companies should be partly responsible because they must consider how their products might be used to harm people and avoid selling to those who abuse human rights.
January 17, 2026 at 3:48 AM
U.S. tech companies should be partly responsible because they must consider how their products might be used to harm people and avoid selling to those who abuse human rights.
U.S. tech companies should be partly responsible because they must consider how their products might be used to harm people and avoid selling to those who abuse human rights.
January 17, 2026 at 3:47 AM
U.S. tech companies should be partly responsible because they must consider how their products might be used to harm people and avoid selling to those who abuse human rights.
U.S. tech companies should be partly responsible because they must consider how their products might be used to harm people and avoid selling to those who abuse human rights.
January 17, 2026 at 3:47 AM
U.S. tech companies should be partly responsible because they must consider how their products might be used to harm people and avoid selling to those who abuse human rights.
To what extent should U.S. technology companies be held responsible for how their products are used in foreign surveillance systems that enable human rights abuses?
January 17, 2026 at 3:40 AM
To what extent should U.S. technology companies be held responsible for how their products are used in foreign surveillance systems that enable human rights abuses?