Zach needs some help from #chemsky on Fig 3. Basically I want to convey the dominant conformer in solution is conf-1, and that conf-2 is a poor fit with our experimental NMR. I admit the figure is cluttered, but I want to crowdsource other ways to convey the this finding.

The chat robots were the most interesting. Gave me 3 different amounts for autopay (none were correct), told me to unenroll and then re-enroll, suggested I never made a payment, then suggested I simply 'pay them' to avoid this issue.
In short: it has been an eventful morning.

I am with you on those days of strict MPs being gone; but I have had reviewers lately ask for Rfs so...it just feels like the gang should be safe and grab all the miscellaneous data while the compounds are still floating around the lab.

It was very strange to see all the RSC templates didn't have a {scheme} float set up! Glad to help out folks in #chemsky

Resolved! It turns out \usepackage[journal=rsc]{chemscheme} fixed it! #chemsky

I was mostly perplexed that the highest level chemistry course completed was cell and molecular biology. I like dynein walking just as much as the next person, but I don't think that helps with Scholl oxidations.

Update: made it back and folks all seem to have done well in my absence. Minus the glovebox, which is the bane of my existence these days.