King Schultz
@kingschultz68.bsky.social
These are accounts on X that are foreign based. Just a few of MANY.
MASSIVE interference going on.
I’m really surprised our government isn’t doing anything about this!
MASSIVE interference going on.
I’m really surprised our government isn’t doing anything about this!
January 10, 2026 at 6:33 PM
These are accounts on X that are foreign based. Just a few of MANY.
MASSIVE interference going on.
I’m really surprised our government isn’t doing anything about this!
MASSIVE interference going on.
I’m really surprised our government isn’t doing anything about this!
To be fair, the Clarity Act allows for a referendum to occur and to negotiate afterwards. That said, it’ll be interesting to see what happens in court now. Maybe a new ruling will make it harder for these separatist traitors. If it gets to a vote = MASSIVE interference (US and others).🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦
January 10, 2026 at 6:27 PM
To be fair, the Clarity Act allows for a referendum to occur and to negotiate afterwards. That said, it’ll be interesting to see what happens in court now. Maybe a new ruling will make it harder for these separatist traitors. If it gets to a vote = MASSIVE interference (US and others).🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦
I was just repeating what I had read on chatGPT
January 10, 2026 at 12:51 AM
I was just repeating what I had read on chatGPT
Ok and what will our federal government do about it? Are we not fed up of always being “democratically” correct and “nice”? This approach can definitely backfire… The PM will need to do something!
January 9, 2026 at 2:57 PM
Ok and what will our federal government do about it? Are we not fed up of always being “democratically” correct and “nice”? This approach can definitely backfire… The PM will need to do something!
As it currently stands, if they get the petition vote numbers, Smith can’t “stop” it… It’s all in the way the law is written. She actually removed that authority, likely strategically. The only thing that can stop is court or some form of emergency powers from the PM. With no trade deal, very touchy
January 9, 2026 at 2:55 PM
As it currently stands, if they get the petition vote numbers, Smith can’t “stop” it… It’s all in the way the law is written. She actually removed that authority, likely strategically. The only thing that can stop is court or some form of emergency powers from the PM. With no trade deal, very touchy
Intranasal vs standard (arm)…
For kids… seems like they would enjoy intranasal more?
Same or similar efficacy? Side effects also seem less with intranasal…
For kids… seems like they would enjoy intranasal more?
Same or similar efficacy? Side effects also seem less with intranasal…
November 4, 2025 at 4:02 PM
Intranasal vs standard (arm)…
For kids… seems like they would enjoy intranasal more?
Same or similar efficacy? Side effects also seem less with intranasal…
For kids… seems like they would enjoy intranasal more?
Same or similar efficacy? Side effects also seem less with intranasal…
Thank you!
Why don’t governments (not talking about the current US) recommend it for all? In Canada, it’s only recommended for vulnerable populations…
I’m guessing this is a cost-benefit thing…
If young kids do benefit, they should recommend it. They don’t make it easy on us!
Why don’t governments (not talking about the current US) recommend it for all? In Canada, it’s only recommended for vulnerable populations…
I’m guessing this is a cost-benefit thing…
If young kids do benefit, they should recommend it. They don’t make it easy on us!
October 29, 2025 at 4:43 PM
Thank you!
Why don’t governments (not talking about the current US) recommend it for all? In Canada, it’s only recommended for vulnerable populations…
I’m guessing this is a cost-benefit thing…
If young kids do benefit, they should recommend it. They don’t make it easy on us!
Why don’t governments (not talking about the current US) recommend it for all? In Canada, it’s only recommended for vulnerable populations…
I’m guessing this is a cost-benefit thing…
If young kids do benefit, they should recommend it. They don’t make it easy on us!
Hey Marc! Long time no speak…
Hope all is well on your end.
Is the flu vaccine recommended for all, including young children?
Thanks :)
Hope all is well on your end.
Is the flu vaccine recommended for all, including young children?
Thanks :)
October 1, 2025 at 5:30 PM
Hey Marc! Long time no speak…
Hope all is well on your end.
Is the flu vaccine recommended for all, including young children?
Thanks :)
Hope all is well on your end.
Is the flu vaccine recommended for all, including young children?
Thanks :)
How exactly would you borrow money to pay for the new military spending?
Where are you borrowing this money from?
Economists say his budget doesn’t make sense. He cannot cap the public service and continue to spend like this. Something will have to give.
Or am I missing something?
Where are you borrowing this money from?
Economists say his budget doesn’t make sense. He cannot cap the public service and continue to spend like this. Something will have to give.
Or am I missing something?
July 5, 2025 at 6:13 PM
How exactly would you borrow money to pay for the new military spending?
Where are you borrowing this money from?
Economists say his budget doesn’t make sense. He cannot cap the public service and continue to spend like this. Something will have to give.
Or am I missing something?
Where are you borrowing this money from?
Economists say his budget doesn’t make sense. He cannot cap the public service and continue to spend like this. Something will have to give.
Or am I missing something?
He promised to cap, and not cut the public service.
How will he pay for the 2% military expenditure?
How will he pay for the 2% military expenditure?
June 9, 2025 at 7:57 PM
He promised to cap, and not cut the public service.
How will he pay for the 2% military expenditure?
How will he pay for the 2% military expenditure?
They would get absorbed by the US. That would be the end goal.
May 17, 2025 at 6:52 PM
They would get absorbed by the US. That would be the end goal.
Simple is sometimes better. Too much is not enough. These are common phrases we hear when referring to food. Carney’s job will be to “simplify” things and make it appear like a win.
May 11, 2025 at 3:00 AM
Simple is sometimes better. Too much is not enough. These are common phrases we hear when referring to food. Carney’s job will be to “simplify” things and make it appear like a win.
Listen, I don’t want it to happen. But we can’t pretend like this is not possible.
Brexit. Catalonia, Spain…
Once a question gets put on a ballot, it’s a scary thought.
Brexit. Catalonia, Spain…
Once a question gets put on a ballot, it’s a scary thought.
May 8, 2025 at 9:14 PM
Listen, I don’t want it to happen. But we can’t pretend like this is not possible.
Brexit. Catalonia, Spain…
Once a question gets put on a ballot, it’s a scary thought.
Brexit. Catalonia, Spain…
Once a question gets put on a ballot, it’s a scary thought.
What I find scary about the 90’s QC referendum is that they were polling in the 35% range and ended up getting 49% support.
I also think our friends down south would welcome this with open arms. They’re also very good at getting what they want via covert means (interference, manipulation).
I also think our friends down south would welcome this with open arms. They’re also very good at getting what they want via covert means (interference, manipulation).
May 8, 2025 at 9:01 PM
What I find scary about the 90’s QC referendum is that they were polling in the 35% range and ended up getting 49% support.
I also think our friends down south would welcome this with open arms. They’re also very good at getting what they want via covert means (interference, manipulation).
I also think our friends down south would welcome this with open arms. They’re also very good at getting what they want via covert means (interference, manipulation).
Should definitely read this constitutional lawyer that is on the pro separation side.
I hope that he is just some nut job that is totally wrong. x.com/ikwilson/sta...
I hope that he is just some nut job that is totally wrong. x.com/ikwilson/sta...
Keith Wilson, K.C. on X: "Richard, respectfully, your post is misleading. The process setout by the Supreme Court of Canada in the 1998 Quebec Succession Reference case directly addresses protecting First Nations' rights as does the resulting Clarity Act. Nothing that the Premier has announced in any https://t.co/QPs5lwTMLF" / X
Richard, respectfully, your post is misleading. The process setout by the Supreme Court of Canada in the 1998 Quebec Succession Reference case directly addresses protecting First Nations' rights as does the resulting Clarity Act. Nothing that the Premier has announced in any https://t.co/QPs5lwTMLF
x.com
May 8, 2025 at 8:44 PM
Should definitely read this constitutional lawyer that is on the pro separation side.
I hope that he is just some nut job that is totally wrong. x.com/ikwilson/sta...
I hope that he is just some nut job that is totally wrong. x.com/ikwilson/sta...
This is what i’m trying to get to the bottom of.
Possible? Yes.
How likely? Seems unlikely.
Possible? Yes.
How likely? Seems unlikely.
May 8, 2025 at 8:19 PM
This is what i’m trying to get to the bottom of.
Possible? Yes.
How likely? Seems unlikely.
Possible? Yes.
How likely? Seems unlikely.
To be fair, re-do this exercise but have the province become a US state. This is what would happen if they got the YES vote.
May 8, 2025 at 7:14 PM
To be fair, re-do this exercise but have the province become a US state. This is what would happen if they got the YES vote.
Glad to be back reading you again!
May 8, 2025 at 6:01 PM
Glad to be back reading you again!
I hope that you right. I am a little more pessimistic. Let us not forget that in the 90’s, polls has the YES vote in QC at around 35%. It ended up being 49%.
Also, the US is very good at influencing and getting what they want via different covert means.
Also, the US is very good at influencing and getting what they want via different covert means.
May 8, 2025 at 5:51 PM
I hope that you right. I am a little more pessimistic. Let us not forget that in the 90’s, polls has the YES vote in QC at around 35%. It ended up being 49%.
Also, the US is very good at influencing and getting what they want via different covert means.
Also, the US is very good at influencing and getting what they want via different covert means.
Did you have the chance to read my link? When I do, it seems like challenges could arise, but as soon as the “clear majority” question has been answered, other provinces wouldn’t have much say. I think it needs to be stopped before it even gets to the question. It feels like interference is going on
May 8, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Did you have the chance to read my link? When I do, it seems like challenges could arise, but as soon as the “clear majority” question has been answered, other provinces wouldn’t have much say. I think it needs to be stopped before it even gets to the question. It feels like interference is going on
It would be nice to have someone like yourself on X putting this guy in his place.
May 8, 2025 at 5:01 PM
It would be nice to have someone like yourself on X putting this guy in his place.
There’s also this.
(for educational purposes).
Thanks again!
www.constitutionalstudies.ca/2019/07/a-lo...
(for educational purposes).
Thanks again!
www.constitutionalstudies.ca/2019/07/a-lo...
A Long and Uncertain Road to Alberta Independence - Centre for Constitutional StudiesA Long and Uncertain Road to Alberta Independence - Centre for Constitutional Studies
www.constitutionalstudies.ca
May 8, 2025 at 4:13 PM
There’s also this.
(for educational purposes).
Thanks again!
www.constitutionalstudies.ca/2019/07/a-lo...
(for educational purposes).
Thanks again!
www.constitutionalstudies.ca/2019/07/a-lo...
Thanks Larry. I’ll have a look.
May 8, 2025 at 3:55 PM
Thanks Larry. I’ll have a look.
Thanks for your reply. This constitutional lawyer tends to think otherwise. I’d like you to know that my intent is not to challenge what you say, but to learn and get to the bottom of this. I really do not want a referendum question to be on a ballot. Have you heard of him? x.com/ikwilson/sta...
Keith Wilson, K.C. on X: "Alberta separation and First Nations rights explained: [1] All eligible Alberta voters can vote in an independence referendum including members of First Nations. One person, one vote. No special treatment for members of First Nations re voting in the referendum. [2] Upon a https://t.co/GlbaRY2WWS" / X
Alberta separation and First Nations rights explained: [1] All eligible Alberta voters can vote in an independence referendum including members of First Nations. One person, one vote. No special treatment for members of First Nations re voting in the referendum. [2] Upon a https://t.co/GlbaRY2WWS
x.com
May 8, 2025 at 3:54 PM
Thanks for your reply. This constitutional lawyer tends to think otherwise. I’d like you to know that my intent is not to challenge what you say, but to learn and get to the bottom of this. I really do not want a referendum question to be on a ballot. Have you heard of him? x.com/ikwilson/sta...