@kimjolliffe.bsky.social
Reposted
The report recommends:
- Splitting the department into two
- Introducing much stronger checks on the powers of the Home Secretary
- Ending the politics that pursue hostile headlines at the expense of evidence & human rights
carladenyer.co.uk/no-way-home/
- Splitting the department into two
- Introducing much stronger checks on the powers of the Home Secretary
- Ending the politics that pursue hostile headlines at the expense of evidence & human rights
carladenyer.co.uk/no-way-home/
No Way Home: It is time to remove management of immigration from the Home Office - Carla Denyer
Carla Denyer: Your Bristol West Green Party MP Candidate. Tackling the Climate Emergency - An End to the Housing Crisis - A Fairer and More Equal City
carladenyer.co.uk
June 18, 2025 at 6:10 AM
The report recommends:
- Splitting the department into two
- Introducing much stronger checks on the powers of the Home Secretary
- Ending the politics that pursue hostile headlines at the expense of evidence & human rights
carladenyer.co.uk/no-way-home/
- Splitting the department into two
- Introducing much stronger checks on the powers of the Home Secretary
- Ending the politics that pursue hostile headlines at the expense of evidence & human rights
carladenyer.co.uk/no-way-home/
Reposted
my soul left my body watching the fox news feed glitching out as the tanks roll past the president’s observation stand and the announcer’s voice echoes across the mostly empty streets, “special thanks to our sponsor, palantir”
June 14, 2025 at 11:23 PM
my soul left my body watching the fox news feed glitching out as the tanks roll past the president’s observation stand and the announcer’s voice echoes across the mostly empty streets, “special thanks to our sponsor, palantir”
Reposted
(3) The Memo authorizes the military forces onto the ground even WITHOUT the existence of disruption to federal law, but instead as PREEMPTIVE action.
A far cry from Justice Department’s long-standing view that the military should be deployed in such domestic situations as a “last resort.”
A far cry from Justice Department’s long-standing view that the military should be deployed in such domestic situations as a “last resort.”
June 9, 2025 at 6:01 PM
(3) The Memo authorizes the military forces onto the ground even WITHOUT the existence of disruption to federal law, but instead as PREEMPTIVE action.
A far cry from Justice Department’s long-standing view that the military should be deployed in such domestic situations as a “last resort.”
A far cry from Justice Department’s long-standing view that the military should be deployed in such domestic situations as a “last resort.”
Reposted
(6) The Memo not only includes National Guard but authorizes regular Armed Forces.
It does not tell you under what authority.
My best guess what the White House is thinking: inherent Article II “protective power” (which has never been tested in court).
It does not tell you under what authority.
My best guess what the White House is thinking: inherent Article II “protective power” (which has never been tested in court).
June 9, 2025 at 6:09 PM
(6) The Memo not only includes National Guard but authorizes regular Armed Forces.
It does not tell you under what authority.
My best guess what the White House is thinking: inherent Article II “protective power” (which has never been tested in court).
It does not tell you under what authority.
My best guess what the White House is thinking: inherent Article II “protective power” (which has never been tested in court).
Reposted
(2) The Memo states: “protests OR acts of violence” that directly inhibit the execution of the laws, constitute a form of rebellion.
Note the “or”!
That means First Amendment non-violent protests. Not violence. Not riots. Protests.
Such a claim would make authoritarians blush.
Note the “or”!
That means First Amendment non-violent protests. Not violence. Not riots. Protests.
Such a claim would make authoritarians blush.
June 9, 2025 at 5:59 PM
(2) The Memo states: “protests OR acts of violence” that directly inhibit the execution of the laws, constitute a form of rebellion.
Note the “or”!
That means First Amendment non-violent protests. Not violence. Not riots. Protests.
Such a claim would make authoritarians blush.
Note the “or”!
That means First Amendment non-violent protests. Not violence. Not riots. Protests.
Such a claim would make authoritarians blush.
Once that area falls, almost the whole border of Karenni and Karen States (excluding Myawaddy and Shwe Ko Ko where junta-backed BGFs remain) will be under full resistance control.
May 30, 2025 at 6:17 AM
Once that area falls, almost the whole border of Karenni and Karen States (excluding Myawaddy and Shwe Ko Ko where junta-backed BGFs remain) will be under full resistance control.