Kim Forsman
@kimforsman.com
Managing Partner @vindician.com | Founder-to-Exit Operator | Deep Tech & Climate Infrastructure Strategist.
I partner with entrepreneurs and institutions to scale ventures at the intersection of technology, capital markets, and sustainability.
I partner with entrepreneurs and institutions to scale ventures at the intersection of technology, capital markets, and sustainability.
Fascinating, I know what I’ll read upon tonight. Thanks for sharing.
April 16, 2025 at 10:04 AM
Fascinating, I know what I’ll read upon tonight. Thanks for sharing.
The solid fraction, biochar, is what removes the carbon from circulation. The resulting biochar will be used for soil amendment and as feedstock for advanced materials production but cannot be used as fuel. Biochar can preserve carbon in an inert form for >100 years.
April 13, 2025 at 10:06 AM
The solid fraction, biochar, is what removes the carbon from circulation. The resulting biochar will be used for soil amendment and as feedstock for advanced materials production but cannot be used as fuel. Biochar can preserve carbon in an inert form for >100 years.
By turning carbonaceous waste into three fractions; gas, liquid and solid through thermochemical conversion. The waste would otherwise be destined for a landfill that would then under anaerobic conditions turn the carbon fraction in the waste into methane (CH4 – 80x potency of CO2 over 20 years)
April 13, 2025 at 9:53 AM
By turning carbonaceous waste into three fractions; gas, liquid and solid through thermochemical conversion. The waste would otherwise be destined for a landfill that would then under anaerobic conditions turn the carbon fraction in the waste into methane (CH4 – 80x potency of CO2 over 20 years)
@josef.is sure it does, but the whole operation is net-negative, meaning that the recursive emissions from the fraction that is burned again as fuels is smaller than what carbon the operation sequesters and removes from circulation.
April 13, 2025 at 9:45 AM
@josef.is sure it does, but the whole operation is net-negative, meaning that the recursive emissions from the fraction that is burned again as fuels is smaller than what carbon the operation sequesters and removes from circulation.