4/4
4/4
4️⃣ It degrades leadership—Governing should require integrity, not performative cruelty.
5️⃣ It’s exhausting—Constant exposure erodes public trust and discourages civic engagement.
🧵3/
4️⃣ It degrades leadership—Governing should require integrity, not performative cruelty.
5️⃣ It’s exhausting—Constant exposure erodes public trust and discourages civic engagement.
🧵3/
1️⃣ It normalizes cruelty—Laughter at mockery signals tacit approval, reinforcing a culture where disrespect is acceptable.
2️⃣ It distorts social norms—When public figures dismiss harmful rhetoric as humor, it shifts what is considered appropriate discourse.
🧵2/
1️⃣ It normalizes cruelty—Laughter at mockery signals tacit approval, reinforcing a culture where disrespect is acceptable.
2️⃣ It distorts social norms—When public figures dismiss harmful rhetoric as humor, it shifts what is considered appropriate discourse.
🧵2/
4️⃣ It degrades leadership—Governing should require integrity, not performative cruelty.
5️⃣ It’s exhausting—Constant exposure erodes public trust and discourages civic engagement.
4️⃣ It degrades leadership—Governing should require integrity, not performative cruelty.
5️⃣ It’s exhausting—Constant exposure erodes public trust and discourages civic engagement.
1️⃣ It normalizes cruelty—Laughter at mockery signals tacit approval, reinforcing a culture where disrespect is acceptable.
2️⃣ It distorts social norms—When public figures dismiss harmful rhetoric as humor, it shifts what is considered appropriate discourse.
1️⃣ It normalizes cruelty—Laughter at mockery signals tacit approval, reinforcing a culture where disrespect is acceptable.
2️⃣ It distorts social norms—When public figures dismiss harmful rhetoric as humor, it shifts what is considered appropriate discourse.