I think I see why UBI has so much resistance...

“Complex” … “difficult decision” … 😱

Hey, why not simply go back to the way you were since the organisation was founded in 1909?

It worked just fine for about 100 years.

It wasn’t originally, before the owner had her “conversion” and realised she’d make way more money from all those LGBTIQA2+++ users. She didn’t want to limit her customers to women only, so despite being named HER, ANYONE is now welcome on it.

Except lesbians of course.

Still not what I’m looking for but gives a good flavour. To really understand why lesbians would be removed is to read the unhinged rant of HER’s owner which is twisted beyond belief. You’ll probably love it. 😉

www.reddit.com/r/actuallesb...

There is a post for women that were removed but I’ll need to find it for you. This will have to do for now

reduxx.info/lesbian-dati...

You guessed wrong.

Please provide it

These are men. They are not lesbians so they are deliberately lying for …

The point, which you seem determined to ignore, is that lesbians were removed from the app because their profiles stated they only wanted to meet women.

I expect that you think a lesbian can have a penis. Lesbians don’t.

What are you on about?

These men were registered on the HER app and as “lesbians” so they could hookup with women.

It’s nothing to do with me or the person who wrote the article. It’s a record of trans identifying men hoping to score by deception.

I never mentioned “stealthing”, whatever that is.

The point is that HER was a female dating app. An app for lesbians to connect but women were getting the “lesbians” as illustrated wanting to hookup. When women stated in their profiles that they didn’t want men they were ejected from the app.

Nope. Read this to find out why. Plenty of detail for you:

genspect.org/ethical-and-...

I don’t know. Even if it was, it obviously should not be required on a lesbian dating app.

Until trans ideology started redefining words to suit its agenda, everyone knew perfectly well what a lesbian was.

There is no evidence to support that repeated assertion.

You are judge and jury I see.

You know it perfectly well, but here’s one for you to disagree with:

A man is an adult human male.

And no, I will not go down some rabbit hole where you start asking more and more question about it. That is the definition.

Thanks. I’ll look out for it.

Sounds very plausible.