In which case the baby had it, as the antibodies were in the blood test. Just that the baby wasn’t producing the antibodies themselves. None of this contradicts Dr Lee
August 8, 2025 at 1:36 PM
In which case the baby had it, as the antibodies were in the blood test. Just that the baby wasn’t producing the antibodies themselves. None of this contradicts Dr Lee
No they were concerned the syndrome had passed onto the baby. This was ruled out by Sally Kinsey in court because only IgG antibodies were detected in the blood test. But that doesn’t contradict Shoo Lee.
August 8, 2025 at 1:16 PM
No they were concerned the syndrome had passed onto the baby. This was ruled out by Sally Kinsey in court because only IgG antibodies were detected in the blood test. But that doesn’t contradict Shoo Lee.
This is incorrect. You’re getting your information from YouTube videos aren’t you? Sally Kinsey testified that the APS IgG antibodies had passed onto the baby. Shoo Lee also stated that RA to LA was theoretically possible via the PFO, just that there were no recorded cases in neonates.
August 8, 2025 at 12:59 PM
This is incorrect. You’re getting your information from YouTube videos aren’t you? Sally Kinsey testified that the APS IgG antibodies had passed onto the baby. Shoo Lee also stated that RA to LA was theoretically possible via the PFO, just that there were no recorded cases in neonates.
Seems a funny way for a scientist to look at it though. The default assumption isn’t that she’s a serial killer and it’s up to science to prove that wrong.
August 6, 2025 at 8:19 AM
Seems a funny way for a scientist to look at it though. The default assumption isn’t that she’s a serial killer and it’s up to science to prove that wrong.