🐧
@khia-go.bsky.social
好好笑，找不到球衣賣家，只好買隊友的號碼自己縫成9
August 25, 2025 at 11:31 AM
好好笑，找不到球衣賣家，只好買隊友的號碼自己縫成9
They can only understand Taiwanese when it’s rendered in Chinese characters, but that’s not the same as directly writing down how the language is spoken. That’s why Hokkien can’t be equated simply with Taiwanese. (3/3)
August 21, 2025 at 5:17 PM
They can only understand Taiwanese when it’s rendered in Chinese characters, but that’s not the same as directly writing down how the language is spoken. That’s why Hokkien can’t be equated simply with Taiwanese. (3/3)
Chinese users generally won’t understand Taiwanese written in Romanization systems (which use Latin alphabets) unless they’ve studied them. (2/3)
August 21, 2025 at 5:16 PM
Chinese users generally won’t understand Taiwanese written in Romanization systems (which use Latin alphabets) unless they’ve studied them. (2/3)
Okay. Somebody deleted the reply, so I pasted my comment here.
They’re not just different accents or dialects within the Chinese language family—they’re entirely different languages.
(1/3)
They’re not just different accents or dialects within the Chinese language family—they’re entirely different languages.
(1/3)
August 21, 2025 at 5:16 PM
Okay. Somebody deleted the reply, so I pasted my comment here.
They’re not just different accents or dialects within the Chinese language family—they’re entirely different languages.
(1/3)
They’re not just different accents or dialects within the Chinese language family—they’re entirely different languages.
(1/3)
They can only understand Taiwanese when it’s rendered in Chinese characters, but that’s not the same as directly writing down how the language is spoken. That’s why Hokkien can’t be equated simply with Taiwanese. (2/2)
August 21, 2025 at 4:40 PM
They can only understand Taiwanese when it’s rendered in Chinese characters, but that’s not the same as directly writing down how the language is spoken. That’s why Hokkien can’t be equated simply with Taiwanese. (2/2)
They’re not just different accents or dialects within the Chinese language family—they’re entirely different languages.
Chinese users generally won’t understand Taiwanese written in Romanization systems (which use Latin alphabets) unless they’ve studied them. (1/2)
Chinese users generally won’t understand Taiwanese written in Romanization systems (which use Latin alphabets) unless they’ve studied them. (1/2)
August 21, 2025 at 4:40 PM
They’re not just different accents or dialects within the Chinese language family—they’re entirely different languages.
Chinese users generally won’t understand Taiwanese written in Romanization systems (which use Latin alphabets) unless they’ve studied them. (1/2)
Chinese users generally won’t understand Taiwanese written in Romanization systems (which use Latin alphabets) unless they’ve studied them. (1/2)
This comment was what my friend and I suggested OTW 5 years ago.
August 18, 2025 at 1:05 AM
This comment was what my friend and I suggested OTW 5 years ago.
Chinese-users are definitely not only people from China and Taiwan, but also from Malaysia, Singapore, Hong Kong, etc. So how come you choose the phrases of “Official/National language”? Some users even not citizens of those two countries.
August 18, 2025 at 1:00 AM
Chinese-users are definitely not only people from China and Taiwan, but also from Malaysia, Singapore, Hong Kong, etc. So how come you choose the phrases of “Official/National language”? Some users even not citizens of those two countries.
應該說，從百年前到現在的創作者都不斷自問「我是誰」，回答這個問題就跟當下的統治者與身分認同有關。
政治可以說是一種被動的不得不，作為背景；政治也能說是一種有意為之的原廠設定，因為不敏於這些，只能受人宰制。
政治可以說是一種被動的不得不，作為背景；政治也能說是一種有意為之的原廠設定，因為不敏於這些，只能受人宰制。
May 19, 2025 at 11:53 PM
應該說，從百年前到現在的創作者都不斷自問「我是誰」，回答這個問題就跟當下的統治者與身分認同有關。
政治可以說是一種被動的不得不，作為背景；政治也能說是一種有意為之的原廠設定，因為不敏於這些，只能受人宰制。
政治可以說是一種被動的不得不，作為背景；政治也能說是一種有意為之的原廠設定，因為不敏於這些，只能受人宰制。